Nope.Anyone who watched knows '94-'95 MJ wasnt near the same.
It felt like he was playing injured that whole time.
He got his legs back and got his rings back.
The way y'all demand to stick to a narrative no matter what the evidence is hilarious.
You seriously say, "The Bulls getting Rodman is irrelevant! Horace Grant and half the Magic lineup getting injured is irrelevant! The Magic shooters falling apart is irrelevant! No, it's MJ "getting his legs back" (even though he took fewer shots and scored fewer points) that makes all the difference!"
These are all numbers for the Chicago-Orlando series each year:
Horace Grant in '95: 18ppg and 11rpg on 65% shooting
Horace Grant in '96: 0 points and 1 rebound, injured in Game 1, replaced by Jon Koncak (who averages 2ppg and 2rpg as the starting PF the rest of the way)
Dennis Rodman in '95: Not on team
Dennis Rodman in '96: 12 ppg and 16 rpg on 53% shooting with fantastic interior defense
Michael Jordan in '95: 31ppg and 7rpg on 48% shooting
Michael Jordan in '96: 29ppg and 6rpg on 52% shooting
Orlando offense in '95: 102ppg for the series
Orlando offense in '96: 85ppg for the series
Chicago offense in '95: 100ppg for the series
Chicago offense in '96: 101ppg for the series
But no, losing Horace Grant wasn't the difference, the Bulls adding a HOF rebounder/defender wasn't the difference, Grant/Anderson/Shaw/Koncak all getting hurt and the Orlando offense falling apart wasn't the difference....it was some imperceptible change in MJ's conditioning that decided that series even though neither his scoring nor the Bulls' scoring improved at all.
![mjlol :mjlol: :mjlol:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/mjlol.png)