The 3-point shot was created for people who couldn't play basketball

the cool

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,238
Reputation
-7,409
Daps
51,489
Not to sound coli-ish but this has a hint of racism to me. Oh no, a black boy can actual shoot with precision and be a star, not just a fast running, bunny hopping dunking clown. No longer can we stress the "fundamentally" sound white kids, who are givin an unfair chance at the NBA because of lack of athleticism.
:mjlol:

everything is racist on the coli
 

Megadeus

Superstar
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
6,599
Reputation
1,646
Daps
31,103
:ohhh: Im actually sort of agreeing with this :jbhmm:

:patrice:I mean... It may not be a popular opinion on the Coli of all places .... which is why im surprised the OP even bothered to post it here..:russ:

:manny: But its true. He's absolutely right. Ive heard about this for years. When Bill Russel, Wilt, Big O and them came into the league and started stuntin on all these 5'11 white dudes, they then added the 3 pt shot to even the odds and give the less gifted players a chance to make an impact... :lupe:A lot of old time basketball purists believe that the 3 pt shot actually ruined the game. The original point of basketball was to find the highest % shot and take it. The highests % shot was meant to be as close to the basket as possible. The philosophy against the 3 pointer was that you shouldnt be rewarding players for taking lower % shots. A shot from down town should be a high risk low reward decision, and teams should be encouraged to find a better shot instead.:yeshrug: When it was first introduced some people feared that the game would one day evolve to the point where the 3 pt shot became the primary option for most offenses, which would effectively kill basketball and turn it into a wacky 3 pt contest.

i
 

JohnStarksMiddleFinger

Benz L. Bo$$ington
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
6,331
Reputation
469
Daps
15,376
Reppin
North Carolina
What? That doesn't make any sense. If you're too small. too slow and can't dribble. You ain't getting your 3 off

Not if you you have really good point guard teammate.

All you got to do is let the other team forget about you standing in the corner and wait for the no look pass

I know this because I was a husky 5"5 with googles....but my J was wet :wow:
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,011
Reputation
9,973
Daps
213,182
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
Not if you you have really good point guard teammate.

All you got to do is let the other team forget about you standing in the corner and wait for the no look pass

I know this because I wasn't very good at sports....but my J was wet :wow:
Soon as nikkas catch on to u ya shyt is cookies everytime.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
32,067
Reputation
4,994
Daps
105,911
:patrice:I mean... It may not be a popular opinion on the Coli of all places .... which is why im surprised the OP even bothered to post it here..:russ:

:manny: But its true. He's absolutely right. Ive heard about this for years. When Bill Russel, Wilt, Big O and them came into the league and started stuntin on all these 5'11 white dudes, they then added the 3 pt shot to even the odds and give the less gifted players a chance to make an impact... :lupe:A lot of old time basketball purists believe that the 3 pt shot actually ruined the game. The original point of basketball was to find the highest % shot and take it. The highests % shot was meant to be as close to the basket as possible. The philosophy against the 3 pointer was that you shouldnt be rewarding players for taking lower % shots. A shot from down town should be a high risk low reward decision, and teams should be encouraged to find a better shot instead.:yeshrug: When it was first introduced some people feared that the game would one day evolve to the point where the 3 pt shot became the primary option for most offenses, which would effectively kill basketball and turn it into a wacky 3 pt contest.

i
the argument applies to free throws more.
 
Top