The Associated Press ain't fukking around with the Alt Right

[Red Shield]

The Alternative Right was first coined by Paul Gottfried, and here are a few views of Gottfried:



Jared Taylor:




Here is some more of Paul:



In other words, he wants them to be more intellectual about their racism. Don't be overly blatant about it for it becomes rather "tasteless". You must be tactful about your racism.

Here is some more from the creator of the term, "Alternative Right".



Again, he wants them to be more codified and not overly brazen. Make racism intellectual again.

And other leaders or intellectuals of the "alt-right" share similar views to Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer. It is a white supremacist movement.

If you think it isn't a movement centered around white supremacy, show me the leaders that aren't with the racism. Show me the leaders that have the same followers and backers as Richard Spencer or Jared Taylor or Steve Bananon. Until then.

Like I said before.. their just trying to find a term that will rebrand them, but not show what they really are.

They tried with nationalist, race realist, hbd.. and now altright.

 

[David_TheMan]

"Neutral" doesn't mean not telling the truth.

Racism/White supremacy is not a political ideology. It should not be treated as it is.

Well they aren't telling the truth.
Now if they won't call the neo-liberals democrats white supremacists and racists, and they don't call all these left wing racist groups the same, they shouldn't be biased and only do it for groups they call "alt right"

If you can't see the bias and problem in what they are doing though, there is no need to continue this convo, you are the choir they are preaching to.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Well they aren't telling the truth.
Now if they won't call the neo-liberals democrats white supremacists and racists, and they don't call all these left wing racist groups the same, they shouldn't be biased and only do it for groups they call "alt right"

Which "neo-liberal" group is holding white supremacists rallys?

If you can't see the bias and problem in what they are doing though, there is no need to continue this convo, you are the choir they are preaching to.

 

[David_TheMan]

Which "neo-liberal" group is holding white supremacists rallys?

The DNC is neo-liberal white supremacist group, the RNC is a neo-conservative white supremacist group

 

[MeachTheMonster]

The DNC is neo-liberal white supremacist group, the RNC is a neo-conservative white supremacist group

The "alt right" says it out loud

 

[David_TheMan]

The "alt right" says it out loud

I dont care about what groups openly say it, in which case they would have no problem with the classification, but if a supposedly neutral organization is not going to define groups for everyone, then its showing inherent bias, and is not acting neutral but with an agenda.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I dont care about what groups openly say it, in which case they would have no problem with the classification, but if a supposedly neutral organization is not going to define groups for everyone, then its showing inherent bias, and is not acting neutral but with an agenda.

They are not defining the group. The group has defined themselves.

 

[David_TheMan]

They are not defining the group. The group has defined themselves.

No, Breitbart has never defined itself as white supremacist and a racist group, so you are wrong with that regard and the msm in regard to throwing them under the alt-right label.

I've seen some try to categorize FEE, Mises, and Lew Rockwell as alt-right as well, which is bogus because its become a term media is turning into a slur and then throwing everyone who disagrees with them and they think might be right leaning as alt-rights to slur and dismiss them.

So like I said, if they won't take this stance to every group, they are showing inherent bias and I would think it should instantly make one start to question who are the people making these decisions and what is their political stance.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

No, Breitbart has never defined itself as white supremacist and a racist group, so you are wrong with that regard and the msm in regard to throwing them under the alt-right label.

Plenty of their writers and editors are "Alt right" members. They go to the rallys. Alt right members use their site as a primary platform for their agenda.

It would be bias to pretend breitbart wasn't an "alt right" site.

I've seen some try to categorize FEE, Mises, and Lew Rockwell as alt-right as well, which is bogus because its become a term media is turning into a slur and then throwing everyone who disagrees with them and they think might be right leaning as alt-rights to slur and dismiss them.

Way off topic to this thread. But if these people identify with the movement. Then the media shouldn't pretend that they don't.

So like I said, if they won't take this stance to every group, they are showing inherent bias and I would think it should instantly make one start to question who are the people making these decisions and what is their political stance.

 

[phobos:\\]

No, Breitbart has never defined itself as white supremacist and a racist group, so you are wrong with that regard and the msm in regard to throwing them under the alt-right label.

I've seen some try to categorize FEE, Mises, and Lew Rockwell as alt-right as well, which is bogus because its become a term media is turning into a slur and then throwing everyone who disagrees with them and they think might be right leaning as alt-rights to slur and dismiss them.

So like I said, if they won't take this stance to every group, they are showing inherent bias and I would think it should instantly make one start to question who are the people making these decisions and what is their political stance.

Steve Banon on Brietbart's platform

"We're the platform for the alt-right," Bannon told me proudly when I interviewed him at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in July

How Donald Trump's campaign chief created an online haven for white nationalists

Alt-right was founded on white supremacist ideals by Gottfried, and leaders of the movement have a white supremacist focal point.

 

[David_TheMan]

Steve Banon on Brietbart's platform


How Donald Trump's campaign chief created an online haven for white nationalists

Alt-right was founded on white supremacist ideals by Gottfried, and leaders of the movement have a white supremacist focal point.

Yet they say they aren't racist, nor white supremacist, which leads to a conflict doesn't it?
An Establishment Conservative's Guide To The Alt-Right

The alternative right, more commonly known as the alt-right, is an amorphous movement. Some — mostly Establishment types — insist it’s little more than a vehicle for the worst dregs of human society: anti-Semites, white supremacists, and other members of the st0rmfr0nt set. They’re wrong.

So again you get into a editorial conflict in labeling a group as racist white supremacist when it says it isn't don't you? In that case again you have to ask who is making the allegation, what the various groups who fall under the label say and do, and etc. When none of these questions are made against the clearly white supremacist and totalitarian leaning RNC and DNC political grops that control the US political system.

Plenty of their writers and editors are "Alt right" members. They go to the rallys. Alt right members use their site as a primary platform for their agenda.

It would be bias to pretend breitbart wasn't an "alt right" site.


Way off topic to this thread. But if these people identify with the movement. Then the media shouldn't pretend that they don't.

Plenty of writers and editors at Breitbart aren't racists or white supremacists though, on top of that, there are a few that reject the label but the media tries to group the in the alt right, like Reason-libertarians, FEE, mises, and lew rockwell various groups of libertarians.

So again like I said, the bias nature of the label, the rejection of the suposed beliefs the AP touts, and the general biased nature of trying to frame writing, reeks of unbiased reporting and those at power using their platform as a propaganda outfit, not a neutral news organization.

 

[re'up]

I think this guy is Alt Right himself, he's made posts like this for a minute, if memory serves. Get him out of here.

 

[the cac mamba]

There was a profile of that Muslim terrorist at Ohio State in the local newspaper that highlighted his fear of praying at Ohio State because there were no prayer rooms like at Columbus State Community College. He was afraid of praying out in the open because of the perception created by the media about Muslims.

.

i need a link

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Yet they say they aren't racist, nor white supremacist, which leads to a conflict doesn't it?
An Establishment Conservative's Guide To The Alt-Right


So again you get into a editorial conflict in labeling a group as racist white supremacist when it says it isn't don't you? In that case again you have to ask who is making the allegation, what the various groups who fall under the label say and do, and etc. When none of these questions are made against the clearly white supremacist and totalitarian leaning RNC and DNC political grops that control the US political system.

The press isn't calling them white supremacists. They are calling them what they want to be called "white nationalist"

Plenty of writers and editors at Breitbart aren't racists or white supremacists though, on top of that, there are a few that reject the label but the media tries to group the in the alt right, like Reason-libertarians, FEE, mises, and lew rockwell various groups of libertarians.

Plenty of people who work for Fox wouldn't label themselves conservative, but it's still a conservative news site

So again like I said, the bias nature of the label, the rejection of the suposed beliefs the AP touts, and the general biased nature of trying to frame writing, reeks of unbiased reporting and those at power using their platform as a propaganda outfit, not a neutral news organization.

 

[Trece]

Tell us now how you are not a White nationalist.


Do you believe that White people are smarter on the whole or a better people than any other group? Or that White culture is better?

Anyone that believes in racial superiority of cacs on some "bell curve" eurocentrist eugenics bullshyt is an idiot..
If that were true asians are washing cacs on the intellectual superiority tip and africans are washing cacs on athleticism so you all still lose..

BUT....
People in here calling voters in "flyover country, cousin fukkers" are equally as stupid.. as if California who votes blue as fukk is smarter than any state with our 47th out of 50 math and reading scores we are some of the dumbest in the country voting blue... so please take classism shyt elsewhere, if you are truly open minded you believe in cultural and moral relativism and some people see things differently and not all of it has to do with racsim..

We need to get out democratic party back on the message of fighting for the working class and the rest will fall into place.

California students score at bottom of nation in reading, math – The Mercury News