
@this thread and LOL@this:
the best part of reb arguing is when he hits dudes with a convoluted ass question with so many negatives that even he's confused but he posts it anyways cuz he knows it's gonna mind fukk whoever he's posing it to.
reb: didn't you claim that weren't not saying that espn isn't a truly anti-journalistic organization that doesn't base their non-coverage of wrongdoings stemming from the negative inactions of those that lack melanin?
other guy's inner monologue: fukk. what did i get myself into. here we go. there's 6 in this part, 2 more here, 4 there, carry the 2...
other guy: no, that's not what i was saying...i think. hold on, lemme check my math.
reb: what, you don't know what YOU said now? typical coli cats...