The Brilliant Idiots: Hollywood Driveby (w/ Immotal Technique)

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@FreshAIG Do you get mad when the news says its gonna rain, and it doesn't?

 

[FreshAIG]

1. And he's right to do that. He has that right and he's not wrong to reach those conclusions. I don't care if drawing pictures of dikks on a piece of paper is your idea of protest art, it doesn't mean you have the right to do it on random buildings.

2. I can, and I will and you don't have to accept it. Deal with it. I think, personally, graffiti is shyt. But thats my opinion as well.

3. You have that right, but his opinion, is entirely valid. Schultz thinks that even if its illegal, it doesn't excuse whatever motive you have for doing it. Just like BLM blocking highways. Protesting makes people inconvenienced, but it doesn't make it "legal" or "permissible" ...not everyone has to accept it.

Ya'll are more interested in finding people who agree with you, than you are in accepting that others have legitimate arguments.

You're exhibiting the height of stupidity by asserting that since andrew doesn't understand where graf came from, which he does, then he doesn't or can't appreciate it, which is also bullshyt.

All the "stupid" shyt online is corny. In real
Life is crack your fuxking head open like a cantaloupe. So let's keep all the name calling out of this and let's just have a civil discussion. Keep all that corny ass name calling shyt in the first grade.

1) I already said that. But also I do understand when people want to be heard that they protest in ways that may not be legally right but they feel it's their only recourse. Doesn't make it right tho. Correct.

2) I think your opinion is shyt. Deal with it.

3) I didn't say his point wasn't valid. I agree with his point that you shouldn't damage property. I think his opinion that graffiti is ugly is dumb but that's his opinion.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

All the "stupid" shyt online is corny. In real
Life is crack your fuxking head open like a cantaloupe. So let's keep all the name calling out of this and let's just have a civil discussion. Keep all that corny ass name calling shyt in the first grade.

1) I already said that. But also I do understand when people want to be heard that they protest in ways that may not be legally right but they feel it's their only recourse. Doesn't make it right tho. Correct.

2) I think your opinion is shyt. Deal with it.

3) I didn't say his point wasn't valid. I agree with his point that you shouldn't damage property. I think his opinion that graffiti is ugly is dumb but that's his opinion.

1. Glad you agree. No matter the motive, graffiti doesn't have to be respected. Period.

2. ...is this an art critique seminar?

3. Yeah. You did. You "don't care what schultz thinks"...remember that? you JUST said that So yeah, not agreeing with someone doesn't mean they don't have a valid point.

Some of ya'll need to take some formal logic courses

Ya'll think agreement means legitimacy

 

[FreshAIG]

Bruh...yes you can. Statistics are valid unto themselves and the arguments they frame and assert. Its the analysts and dummies () who extrapolate beyond that

Yes, based on every known statistic and polling measure done to date, blacks are THE most religious demographic in this country.

That does not, however, equate to if they're the most homophobic demographic and I have not seen any evidence linking the two, however there may be some casual interaction or confounding there.

Again you saying a bunch of nothing and constantly think you're proving a point is laughable and is the theme of this entire thread. "Statistics are valid unto themselves" is an empty statement that literally means nothing lol. You're good at providing those. Just as good as you are at making assumptions with nothing to back it up.

 

[FreshAIG]

1. Glad you agree. No matter the motive, graffiti doesn't have to be respected. Period.

2. ...is this an art critique seminar?

3. Yeah. You did. You "don't care what schultz thinks"...remember that? you JUST said that So yeah, not agreeing with someone doesn't mean they don't have a valid point.

Some of ya'll need to take some formal logic courses

Ya'll think agreement means legitimacy

What does me not caring what he thinks have to do with whether I agree or not? Are you slow? I'm not even trying to be funny. Your comprehension is very low. You're framing my argument different than what I'm saying , basically creating an argument with a perception of what you want me to mean than what I'm actually saying, just so you can continue to argue. It's weird.

 

[FreshAIG]

@FreshAIG Do you get mad when the news says its gonna rain, and it doesn't?

Actually yeah, I live in Cali most of the time now and we need it to rain desperately lmao.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Again you saying a bunch of nothing and constantly think you're proving a point is laughable and is the theme of this entire thread. "Statistics are valid unto themselves" is an empty statement that literally means nothing lol. You're good at providing those. Just as good as you are at making assumptions with nothing to back it up.

It means the world to anyone who knows what statistics are.

They are representative measures used to derive useful information and reliable information TO THE DEGREE THAT PARAMETERS ARE ACCEPTED BY THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE METHODOLOGY UNTO THE RESEARCH.

Stats can't infer what they dont speak on.

ALL THE STUDIES DONE, show that blacks are the MOST religious demographic.

You just saying "well it doesn't prove all blacks are most religions people" doesn't change the fact that the studies, multiple, independent ones, show otherwise.

According to the methods and practices asserted by those studies, that is consistent with those findings.

Unless you'd like to present your tools and methods.

It seems to me that you don't understand what statistics are, how they're used, or what they imply.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

What does me not caring what he thinks have to do with whether I agree or not? Are you slow? I'm not even trying to be funny. Your comprehension is very low. You're framing my argument different than what I'm saying , basically creating an argument with a perception of what you want me to mean than what I'm actually saying, just so you can continue to argue. It's weird.

Do you not understand that you don't have to agree with someone even if you understand them?

 

[Harry B]

There's no possible way to prove this as a fact. There was one survey done and concluded that 56 percent of Blacks in America are religious. There's no way to accurately prove something like that. At most you can make an estimation (which are done through statistics) but it's far from a fact. Andrew had that theory based off his own experience and uses the first article he could find to support his argument. Which is what people normally tend to do when they care more about proving about than having a genuine discussion

Btw I do think we are more religious than whites but that's just from my experience. And because I feel when you're dealing with an oppressed people they tend to seek out religion as a means to get through rough times and provide hope in despair. But that's just from my personal experience, there's no poll or survey that can prove it as a fact.

Not accurately but you can come close with a desired margin of error, statistically speaking.

If they say that it's a 95 % chance that all such studies will conclude that the yielded result is true, it's a pretty high probability that it's true. And if repeated tests show this, it gets pretty hard to deny it.

Another observation, black people vote like the republican crazy religious rednecks on issues relating to religion. That might be cultural though. My obs are skewed though, cause I'm never in republican states or cities.

How about Hispanics? They must be ahead of white cats as well.

 

[FreshAIG]

Do you not understand that you don't have to agree with someone even if you understand them?

I should be asking YOU that.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Not accurately but you can come close with a desires margin of error, statistically speaking.

@FreshAIG is just revealing his weakness in this area.

At no point did I ever said this was "fact"

All I said was that ACCORDING TO THE STATISTIC SAMPLING done in many areas, many times, by many people, the trends suggest that blacks are the most religious demographic.

Now, you can disagree all you want, but simply saying "I don't believe that" with none of the effort invested in showing why or how those studies are flawed by even addressing the methodology in specific studies or the mathematical rationalizations used or put in place, doesn't make you a better debater.

You can't cry foul when you can't even defend your argument.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I should be asking YOU that.

I'm relying on the statistics.

You're relying on the notion that the conclusion makes you uncomfortable.

And this shouldn't even be controversial.

Theres nothing you've even proposed that challenges, or suggests an alternative outcome for the notion of which demographic is more religious. You can't even be bothered to do that.

"nuh uh" isn't a useful answer here.

I've posted multiple studies, analyses, and reviews on this topic. All you've said is "wells stats don't prove everything"...I never said it did. Stats only reveal what they reveal, what they "prove" is up to you.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@FreshAIG Just admit you don't how how statistics works, and dead the argument. Cause its clear that I'm not about to explain to you what should have been done in college for you.

 

[FreshAIG]

I'm relying on the statistics.

You're relying on the notion that the conclusion makes you uncomfortable.

And this shouldn't even be controversial.

Theres nothing you've even proposed that challenges, or suggests an alternative outcome for the notion of which demographic is more religious. You can't even be bothered to do that.

"nuh uh" isn't a useful answer here.

I've posted multiple studies, analyses, and reviews on this topic. All you've said is "wells stats don't prove everything"...I never said it did. Stats only reveal what they reveal, what they "prove" is up to you.

Actually again Schultz is right

Ther are more white Christians.

More Black people are Christians as a percentage of all black people then other demographics. It's an out right fact.

this is your post word for word. No alterations. Stop saying you didn't say it was a fact because that's exactly what you said.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

this is your post word for word. No alterations. Stop saying you didn't say it was a fact because that's exactly what you said.

OK.

Fine. Shouldn't have used the word "fact"

And this still doesn't address it took you 4 pages to admit you don't know how statistics work.