I completely understand where you're coming from.
This is a podcast that could really do with a rotating panel of guests revolving around Charlamagne as the constant, but at this point it's too established to become that. I don't know much about the Van guy from TMZ, but he seems to be different enough from Charlamagne that a pod with the two of them wouldn't sound like an orgy of agreeance. That Letty chick is an air-head (in the least mysogynistic way, men can be air-heads too) and Wax is so woefully and proudly ignorant and brutish that at first where his beliefs and rhetoric was slightly entertaining, the more you come to terms with the fact that it's who he is, it actually becomes disturbing.
To me, one of the things Andrew suffers from that a lot of comedians suffer from is this false mantle of Comedian As Social Commentator. I listen to a lot of podcasts fronted by comedians, and especially New York bred comedians suffer from this.
The greatest comedians of a generation wear this title, your Chris Rocks, Pryors, Carlins etc., but just because some comedians are excellent social commentators, doesn't mean they all are. But some of them (like Schulz) believe themselves to be more poignant than they are, when all they are is joke slingers.
Rock breaks down society, Dane Cook tells jokes.
Nas at his best writes urban poetry, T.I. spits raps.
Schulz is both not as funny as he thinks he is, nor as smart as he thinks he is.
Rant over lol. Just had to get this off my chest. I hope one of those nikkas is reading this (namely Chris Morrow, because he could actually do something about it)