Getting very difficult to dispute.
Except for the fact I just debunked all his cherry-picked sample size nonsense.
They lost to some of these same type of teams with Kyrie though
OT loss to T'Wolves (Allen missed two free throws with five seconds remaining - he makes one and they win)
OT loss Grizzlies (Kyrie and LeVert carried them; Dinwiddie misses a FT after Memphis intentionally fouls - lose game by one point)
Loss to Pistons (it was four-point game when Kyrie left the game in the 3rd quarter, and when he returned in the 4th it was a 13-point game; Kyrie then proceeded to score or assist on 19 of their last 28 points; Nets players also miss FT at the end of the game).
Regardless of all that, it was at the start of the season, on a new team, whereas most of these players on the Nets have played together for a while now. They're not going to have it all figured out in the first handful of games. You can't draw any conclusions out of such a small sample size of games.
My eyes keep telling me he's too good not to be missed by these teams, but the results keep saying otherwise. Cleveland could have used him in 2015 Finals though, although coincidentally the game he played......
Coincidentally the game he played he forced OT with a block, and had the highest net rating out of all the Cavs players. You mean
that game?
Keep it 100, if this were Curry's track record.....
Except it's not. Nor does Steph have any relevance here. Why even bring him up?
THIS POST MAKES ZERO SENSE.
