The Celtics had to give up Bradley and Crowder

[Vancouver Grizzly Fan]

Giving up Bradley was a mistake but, Crowder isn't a loss. For anyone to say that, obviously don't watch basketball. Crowder is nothing more then a streaky spot up 3 point chucker who's, solid on defense. Tatum and Brown have alot of potential.

 

[Damnshow]

Bradley is a huge loss crowder isn't
Bradley and kyrie would have been incredible together crowder isn't even going to start in Cleveland or play in the final 5 minutes of a playoff game

bradley was going to demand the money that celtics could not afford

they did that by overpaying "me no bang in paint papi" horford

they can't just have kyrie, hayward, horford on the team and give avery his big paycheck. If avery stays one of those three got to go.

 

[WMG the 2nd]

bradley was going to demand the money that celtics could not afford

they did that by overpaying "me no bang in paint papi" horford

they can't just have kyrie, hayward, horford on the team and give avery his big paycheck. If avery stays one of those three got to go.

I agree it needed to happen of course but Bradley with Hayward and Irving is a amazing back court/wing combination and make them a poor mans golden state with 3D shooting guard, dynamic scoring pg, and a above average skill
Brad Stevens coaching is not being valued enough either in this equation. Gets his star from college and replaces 5'8 Thomas with 6'3 kyrie who is younger and has never been with a coach as good as brad Stevens for a long time. He was at duke for 11 games and has had I'm thinkin 4-5 coaches since he been in the NBA

 

[100Percent]

I'm also astonished by the hype Crowder is getting. Dudes on ESPN already saying he's a more valuable piece than IT when it comes to the trade .
Crowder is average as fukk. Streaky ass shooter and shytty at everything else on offense. Plays tough on defense but not like he isn't replaceable on that end either.

Hes by no means the better player but I see what they mean by more valuable.

1. Hes on a GREAT contract, cheap and long
2. IT is on the last year of his contract and will demand max money
3. Hes the type of player really any team could use.

I see a lot more teams trying to get Jae than IT right now.

 

[McPiff]

Hes by no means the better player but I see what they mean by more valuable.

1. Hes on a GREAT contract, cheap and long
2. IT is on the last year of his contract and will demand max money
3. Hes the type of player really any team could use.

I see a lot more teams trying to get Jae than IT right now.

exactly, dumb ass nikkas in here acting like most valuable mean better player