Me?

Aren't you a Dawkins fan? You should be the one who's mad. I already exposed atheism fallacies.
You have no comprehension of what you just posted, do you?Atheism does have an ideology...wtf are you talking about? Look at Marxist-Leninist Atheism.
Marxism is materialism. As such, it is as relentlessly hostile to religion as was the materialism of the eighteenth-century Encyclopaedists or the materialism of Feuerbach. This is beyond doubt. But the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels goes further than the Encyclopaedists and Feuerbach, for it applies the materialist philosophy to the domain of history, to the domain of the social sciences. We must combat religion—that is the ABC of all materialism, and consequently of Marxism. But Marxism is not a materialism which has stopped at the ABC. Marxism goes further. It says: We must know how to combat religion, and in order to do so we must explain the source of faith and religion among the masses in a materialist way. The combating of religion cannot be confined to abstract ideological preaching, and it must not be reduced to such preaching. It must be linked up with the concrete practice of the class movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion
that's quite a bunch of jibuh jabuh![]()
you should probably give credit to your source
![]()
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm
dat ether...
seved so fresh
...so daily
![]()
![]()
#thekingsmenMe?
Aren't you a Dawkins fan? You should be the one who's mad. I already exposed atheism fallacies.
You have no comprehension of what you just posted, do you?
#thekingsmenExplain to me oh great one. Can you also explain how something comes out of nothing?
#thekingsmenMe?
Aren't you a Dawkins fan? You should be the one who's mad. I already exposed atheism fallacies.
#projectionSo basically @tmonster and his boyfriend @melbourneland can't explain what Marx meant. Perfect examples why atheists are laughed at....![]()
you can't explain what you copy pasta'dSo basically @tmonster and his boyfriend @melbourneland can't explain what Marx meant. Perfect examples why atheists are laughed at....![]()
Atheism does have an ideology...wtf are you talking about? Look at Marxist-Leninist Atheism.
Marxism is materialism. As such, it is as relentlessly hostile to religion as was the materialism of the eighteenth-century Encyclopaedists or the materialism of Feuerbach. This is beyond doubt. But the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels goes further than the Encyclopaedists and Feuerbach, for it applies the materialist philosophy to the domain of history, to the domain of the social sciences. We must combat religion—that is the ABC of all materialism, and consequently of Marxism. But Marxism is not a materialism which has stopped at the ABC. Marxism goes further. It says: We must know how to combat religion, and in order to do so we must explain the source of faith and religion among the masses in a materialist way. The combating of religion cannot be confined to abstract ideological preaching, and it must not be reduced to such preaching. It must be linked up with the concrete practice of the class movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion
Atheism does have an ideology...wtf are you talking about? Look at Marxist-Leninist Atheism.
Marxism is materialism. As such, it is as relentlessly hostile to religion as was the materialism of the eighteenth-century Encyclopaedists or the materialism of Feuerbach. This is beyond doubt. But the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels goes further than the Encyclopaedists and Feuerbach, for it applies the materialist philosophy to the domain of history, to the domain of the social sciences. We must combat religion—that is the ABC of all materialism, and consequently of Marxism. But Marxism is not a materialism which has stopped at the ABC. Marxism goes further. It says: We must know how to combat religion, and in order to do so we must explain the source of faith and religion among the masses in a materialist way. The combating of religion cannot be confined to abstract ideological preaching, and it must not be reduced to such preaching. It must be linked up with the concrete practice of the class movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion
that's quite a bunch of jibuh jabuh![]()
you should probably give credit to your source
![]()
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm
discouraging belief in magic and fairytales does NOT = killing believers
trash thread
Explain to me oh great one. Can you also explain how something comes out of nothing?
#thekingsmen
Why do you think your supernatural deity exists?
#ShiaLabeoufAtheism does have an ideology...wtf are you talking about? Look at Marxist-Leninist Atheism.
Marxism is materialism. As such, it is as relentlessly hostile to religion as was the materialism of the eighteenth-century Encyclopaedists or the materialism of Feuerbach. This is beyond doubt. But the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels goes further than the Encyclopaedists and Feuerbach, for it applies the materialist philosophy to the domain of history, to the domain of the social sciences. We must combat religion—that is the ABC of all materialism, and consequently of Marxism. But Marxism is not a materialism which has stopped at the ABC. Marxism goes further. It says: We must know how to combat religion, and in order to do so we must explain the source of faith and religion among the masses in a materialist way. The combating of religion cannot be confined to abstract ideological preaching, and it must not be reduced to such preaching. It must be linked up with the concrete practice of the class movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion