If a man's minimum wage salary is not good enough for a woman then why is she letting him nutt inside her?
If she knows that he makes $ 9.00 per hour then why is she demanding that he provide like he makes 70'k and calling him a deadbeat because he cant?
Well for starters I doubt people are talking about $$$ like that. If two people are fukking w/no protection and they aren't married or in a relationship they probably aren't discussing things relevant to family planning
And like the thread says ultimately with the way the courts default the woman is taking the bigger L here. So yea if she wants someone who can provide a 70K lifestyle and she opens her legs up to a dude making 18K thats her L. Doesn't excuse the dude of his responsibility or the consequences of his actions though

But in the context of a dude who doesn't want a kid, couple hundred dollars in child support >>>>>>>>>>>>> having to raise a kid and cover all the costs that child support doesnt. And I imagine if a dude is fukking a chick who is 100% subsidized by the govt and other child support he is probably just as poor and subsidized. If a man w/a career is fukking chicks on welfare looking for a come up
with no condom he deserves whatever the courts throw at him. Actions have consequences