stop licking Rhodesian mboro
Lol. Even seeing it written out is terrible. Just say dikk next time please.
Speaking the truth is not "sucking" up to anyone. What do Zimbabweans gain from lying to ourselves or anyone else?

Fuseki, uri Dodi![]()
I see a lot of posters here praising Mugabe as some sort of pan african super hero.
Are you guys trolling or you really really honestly dont know that truth?
Edit:
Some on here see him as someone who said "up yours" to white people. But he really just screwed black Zimbaweans and the white farmers injured or killed...
I dont want to write a million word post on all the abuses and what not Zimbaweans suffered during his rule.
For those asking: Im not going to go dig up every post and @ everyone who posted something about mugabe. But you can find the posts if you care to.
Edit again:
Im just going to post one poster:
For clarity, Mugabe had a lot of people pushing for him to stay in power. Even if he wanted to step down there were too many people "eating" from his regime and worked to keep the status quo. There are probably some still working to turn things back in their favour.
Another Edit:
I see that to some calling out magabe and other leaders like him is seen as a betrayal to the "black cause" by some.
Imagine building houses. You skrimped and saved in VERY difficult economoic conditions. You build your house for your family and babies but the state comes and buldozes all those houses, at the start of the rainy season, because the leader had decided he personally doesnt like their location, not because the land was stolen or protected land not to be built on. Then you watch helplessly as everything you worked for is destroyed.
They could have said STOP BUILDING! The moment someone broke ground on the first houses foundation, but no. They let hundreds waste their time, momey and energy building. Only to then demolish it all.
So if being against somethiNg like that is anti black or seen as pro white then I just dont know.
Maybe we have different interpretations of being pro black and pro basic human rights.
I don't see any links in your OP providing proof Mugabe is such a poor leader. Last I checked, cacs have been interfering with Zimbabwe ecoomically and instigating regime change.
Really?
Well check again.
A George Bush-hired racist diplomat noted Mugabe as a genius in the American WikiLeaks documents. Mugabe militarily dominated and defeated cacs; skewered them and threw their organs on the road; and cacs have been trying to destroy him ever since.
To that end, the CIA, MI6, American and European governments have been interfering with Zimbabwe ecnomically and instigating regime change.
Mugabe is the only African modern leader to have ever defeated the White Man so thoroughly and utterly in battle. He is the only African leader that remains alive after cacs caught and turned Mandela (the CIA admits to GIVING MANDELA'S LOCATION TO THE APARTHEID WHITES), killed the Congolese freedom fighter, etc. Your argument is that Mugabe has been so evil for blacks, yet in South Africa, whites dominate blacks. Mugabe is a hero. He gave his people a new lease on life. It is up to Zimbabweans to do what they will with it.
Without Mugabe, Zimbabweans would be slaves to white people, basically. Better freedom while struggling on knees than slavery on your feet while condemned.
@godkiller A bit of this has already been discussed in the thread but it seems you have NO idea what life was/is like for tge average Zimbabwean under mugabe/zanupf rule.
Thats why i titled the thread the MYTH
My Wikileaks' reading shows that racist white American cacs hate Mugabe, but that they think he's "brilliant", in their own words. I also know the CIA is viciously anti-black and this motivated their foreign policy in South Africa, including Zimbabwe, whereupon the CIA handed over Nelson Mandela to apartheid. Your views support racist cacs' assumptions on Mugabe, which as we know are tilted, wrong and biased to whatever benefits white people. Hence Mandela's capture by the CIA (for the crime of resisting South African Nazism), the events which followed, and the CIA's ultimate apology. Why should your cac beliefs be held as true?
My Wikileaks' reading shows that racist white American cacs hate Mugabe, but that they think he's "brilliant", in their own words. I also know the CIA is viciously anti-black and this motivated their foreign policy in South Africa, including Zimbabwe, whereupon the CIA handed over Nelson Mandela to apartheid. Your views support racist cacs' assumptions on Mugabe, which as we know are tilted, wrong and biased to whatever benefits white people. Hence Mandela's capture by the CIA (for the crime of resisting South African Nazism), the events which followed, and the CIA's ultimate apology. Why should your cac beliefs be held as true?
Sure he killed thousands of fellow black Zimbabweans and denied Zimbabwe democracy, just as the white farmers would.... but at least he was blacknikka stop reaching, please.
i don't know enough to comment but the general sentiment was that mugabe was preferable to white farmers reminiscient of slavemasters.

