The Coli Official HIV/AIDS Information and Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Thoughts
- Start date
.
stealthbomber
cruising at 30,000
if you're fukking the type of girls that would give u an aids scare you lost already
if you ain't doing anal sex, and are heterosexual not screwing with trannys, bisexual, homosexuals, sharing needles, your odds of getting hiv is slim to nil
This is very true. It's actually really hard for a male to get HIV from vaginal sex
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;9(2):118-29. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70021-0.
Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Boily MC1, Baggaley RF, Wang L, Masse B, White RG, Hayes RJ, Alary M.
Author information
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies of the risk of HIV-1 transmission per heterosexual contact. 43 publications comprising 25 different study populations were identified. Pooled female-to-male (0.04% per act [95% CI 0.01-0.14]) and male-to-female (0.08% per act [95% CI 0.06-0.11]) transmission estimates in high-income countries indicated a low risk of infection in the absence of antiretrovirals. Low-income country female-to-male (0.38% per act [95% CI 0.13-1.10]) and male-to-female (0.30% per act [95% CI 0.14-0.63]) estimates in the absence of commercial sex exposure (CSE) were higher. In meta-regression analysis, the infectivity across estimates in the absence of CSE was significantly associated with sex, setting, the interaction between setting and sex, and antenatal HIV prevalence. The pooled receptive anal intercourse estimate was much higher (1.7% per act [95% CI 0.3-8.9]). Estimates for the early and late phases of HIV infection were 9.2 (95% CI 4.5-18.8) and 7.3 (95% CI 4.5-11.9) times larger, respectively, than for the asymptomatic phase. After adjusting for CSE, presence or history of genital ulcers in either couple member increased per-act infectivity 5.3 (95% CI 1.4-19.5) times versus no sexually transmitted infection. Study estimates among non-circumcised men were at least twice those among circumcised men. Low-income country estimates were more heterogeneous than high-income country estimates, which indicates poorer study quality, greater heterogeneity of risk factors, or under-reporting of high-risk behaviour. Efforts are needed to better understand these differences and to quantify infectivity in low-income countries.
PMID:
19179227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per s... [Lancet Infect Dis. 2009] - PubMed - NCBI
Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per sexual act: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Boily MC1, Baggaley RF, Wang L, Masse B, White RG, Hayes RJ, Alary M.
Author information
- 1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK. mc.boily@imperial.ac.uk
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies of the risk of HIV-1 transmission per heterosexual contact. 43 publications comprising 25 different study populations were identified. Pooled female-to-male (0.04% per act [95% CI 0.01-0.14]) and male-to-female (0.08% per act [95% CI 0.06-0.11]) transmission estimates in high-income countries indicated a low risk of infection in the absence of antiretrovirals. Low-income country female-to-male (0.38% per act [95% CI 0.13-1.10]) and male-to-female (0.30% per act [95% CI 0.14-0.63]) estimates in the absence of commercial sex exposure (CSE) were higher. In meta-regression analysis, the infectivity across estimates in the absence of CSE was significantly associated with sex, setting, the interaction between setting and sex, and antenatal HIV prevalence. The pooled receptive anal intercourse estimate was much higher (1.7% per act [95% CI 0.3-8.9]). Estimates for the early and late phases of HIV infection were 9.2 (95% CI 4.5-18.8) and 7.3 (95% CI 4.5-11.9) times larger, respectively, than for the asymptomatic phase. After adjusting for CSE, presence or history of genital ulcers in either couple member increased per-act infectivity 5.3 (95% CI 1.4-19.5) times versus no sexually transmitted infection. Study estimates among non-circumcised men were at least twice those among circumcised men. Low-income country estimates were more heterogeneous than high-income country estimates, which indicates poorer study quality, greater heterogeneity of risk factors, or under-reporting of high-risk behaviour. Efforts are needed to better understand these differences and to quantify infectivity in low-income countries.
PMID:
19179227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Heterosexual risk of HIV-1 infection per s... [Lancet Infect Dis. 2009] - PubMed - NCBI
Again, that's depending on the "viral load", if viral load is high, it doesn't matter the gender of the carrier, your chances of infection are increased.
They are. I just posted that article. The chances are still slim. I'm not saying go out and have unprotected sex, but it's still unlikely that you will catch HIV. It's much more likely with needles or anal sex
yup would take numerous times as well.
alot of dudes who got hiv were doing anal sex, or fn with trannys
@magic johnson
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
this is incorrect thinking breh...anybody is susceptible[DOUBLEPOST=1397430681][/DOUBLEPOST]
the anus isnt built for penetration....the colon gets torn...bleeding occurs...and there you have it.
use the vagina breh...it self-lubricates and is made for penetration
Soft rectal tissue, and small tears that release enough of the virus to infiltrate your body's defenses.
Last edited:
