Doobie Doo
Veteran
FCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition
Customers should be able to watch TV on any device without CableCard, FCC said.
by Jon Brodkin - Feb 18, 2016 12:01pm EST
227
Mr.TinDC
The Federal Communications Commission today approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that seeks to give consumers more choices in the set-top boxes they use to watch cable TV.
The vote was 3-2, with Chairman Tom Wheeler and fellow Democrats Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel voting in favor of the proposal, while Republicans Ajit Pai and Michael O'Rielly voted against. An NPRM is not a final vote. Instead, this will kick off a months-long public comment period leading up to a final vote that is likely to happen before the end of this year.
The FCC is essentially trying to create a software-based replacement for CableCard. Pay-TV operators from the cable, satellite, and telco industries would have to provide content and programming information to makers of third-party hardware or applications. Theoretically, customers could then watch their TV channels on various devices without needing to rent a set-top box from their cable company and without buying equipment that is compatible with a physical CableCard.
ADVERTISING
One possibility is that new set-top boxes could combine online video sources with cable TV channels.
The proposal has been criticized by cable companies and Republicans. Critics say it would force cable companies to build new hardware and require customers to rent even more boxes. They also say the proposal would let third-party set-top box makers insert their own advertising into pay-TV content and undermine programming agreements between programmers and pay-TV companies.
Wheeler accused proponents of spreading misinformation.
"Nothing in this item requires a second box in the home," he said. "There is nothing in here that allows third parties to disaggregate cable content or sell advertising around it... It takes the same system that goes to the cable box today with the same structures and moves it through a different box requiring the same structures. As a result, existing copyrights and programming agreements are unaffected, consumer privacy is protected, emergency alerts are passed through and child protection laws are unaffected. Nothing in this proposal slows down or stops cable innovation."
Wheeler said the new rule will prohibit makers of set-top boxes and apps from putting extra advertising around pay-TV content.
Pay-TV companies will be required to deliver a few information streams to makers of other set-top boxes and apps. They include channel listings, video-on-demand lineups, information about what a device is allowed to do with content (such as recording), and the actual programming consumers are entitled to receive. Customers would still need a cable TV subscription for this to work.
Pay-TV companies would have two years to comply.
"These are two systems that work the same," Wheeler said. "The difference is one is closed and one is open. The consumers have no choice today. Congress mandated [in the 1996 Telecommunications Act] that consumers should have choice."
The FCC is not mandating a specific standard for the cable companies to adopt. Instead, the commission said it recommends that the information streams "be available to the creators of competitive solutions using any published, transparent format that conforms to specifications set by an independent, open standards body."
The FCC is also proposing a billing transparency rule that makes sure "consumers understand their monthly charges for both programming services and equipment lease fees."
Pai argued that the FCC is "doubl[ing] down on the necessity of having a box" instead of trying to get rid of set-top boxes entirely. "Our goal should not be to unlock the box, it should be to eliminate the box," Pai said. "This goal is technically feasible and it reflects most consumers' preferences, including my own."
Pai said pay-TV companies have told him that it "would be less expensive" to comply with the proposed rules by making additional boxes than changing current devices. "If the commission's proposal is implemented, the American people will probably end up paying for more boxes, not fewer," he said.
O'Rielly argued that if pay-TV companies are required to provide content to other companies, then online streaming video providers should be required to send all their content to the pay-TV operators. He argued that the video industry is already "moving away" from set-top boxes.
"Given the choice between disruptive technologies and disruptive regulations, no one should have any doubt which side I'm," O'Rielly said.
Rosenworcel argued that the cable box proposal will boost competition in an industry that sorely needs it. She compared set-top boxes and remotes to smartphones, saying the cable devices haven't been improved much over the years.
"Smartphones have changed our lives and are changing our world, but the clunky set-top box and many-buttoned remote have not evolved at the same pace, nor have they faced the same amount of competition," Rosenworcel said.
Clyburn disputed critics' claims that the FCC proposal will hurt minority programmers by making it harder for them to get content in front of viewers. For minority programmers who have carriage agreements with pay-TV systems, "I see no legitimate business or economic reason why this item should make their programming relationship with the distributor any more vulnerable than their counterparts','" she said. "What I hope will occur is creators of content who have been unable to get MVPD [multichannel video programming distributor] carriage may soon have a way to reach consumers directly."
Comcast Senior Executive VP David Cohen criticized the FCC decision. "Today’s action inexplicably ignores the market-driven 'apps' based approach suggested by the technical committee [that advised the FCC], which is rapidly proliferating in the market and giving consumers unprecedented options to receive video programming services," Cohen said in a statement. "Unfortunately, the majority of Commissioners have chosen to ignore the many voices of reason and instead to pursue a proposal that strays well beyond the FCC’s authority under the Communications Act, and would violate copyright and other statutory and constitutional protections."
Consumer advocates and some Democratic members of Congress praised the FCC's vote.
“For more than two decades, the cable industry has sought to control all consumer video interfaces, leaving Americans with no choice but to lease their box from their television provider,"US Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said. "The results have been bloated rental fees, little choice and nearly non-existent competition in the video box marketplace. The FCC’s new framework for innovators and companies to develop new technologies that allow consumers to access video programming without having to rent a box from their pay-TV provider is smart, fair and a long time in coming. The FCC’s action will help ensure that consumers are not captive to high video box leasing fees forever."
FCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition
.....so someone else please dumb it down for her and tell her why this is great; I ain't got time to do it 
