THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (CASE OVER) (PROSECUTION DELCARES THEY ARE NO LONGER GOING TO ARGUE KIDNAPPING, ARSON AND SEX TRAFFICKING IN THE RICO)

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 262 64.1%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 147 35.9%

  • Total voters
    409

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
20,974
Reputation
7,508
Daps
114,471
Reppin
NULL
Plead the 5th and dont answer nothing simple. They wouldn’t called him to the stand if he would no cooperate

I hope you never get a subpoena.

You're gonna be on the stand thinking you're a G by pleading the 5th only for the judge to order your dumb ass to answer the questions or he'll throw you in jail:mjlol:

The 5th is to keep you from incriminating yourself. It's not meant for a witness who played no part in a crime. If it was as easy as you thought no one would ever testify.
 
Last edited:

cheapshot

All Star
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
885
Reputation
216
Daps
2,721
His actions alone are what brought the case.

So if he wasn't doing the wild sh*t he was doing, he wouldn't be locked up. Cassie is just the top of the iceberg. They have six more weeks of mad people speaking about what they saw dude and say. So blaming Cassie for any of this ain't the move. The case isn't about her being abused. It's about dude breaking federal laws. That's clear as day with what he's been charged with. Just because other sh*t is going on in the country, that doesn't mean trash people stop getting locked up for committing crimes. Come on now.

People gotta chill with focusing on the victims and random irrelevant sh*t, when this dude literally ruined the lives of damn near everyone he's met. Both personally and in the music business. Whatever happens to him with this case and elsewhere, is on him. He did it to himself.
I didn't mean to make it sound like I was blaming Cassie. It's just that all of these things seem out of place. Puff is on video attacking Cassie, but nobody took any legal action about her treatment. All of the other incidents seem like crimes too, but still no charges for the actual acts. I just had the impression that the case was to address Cassie being trafficked and that she was the star witness. Kid Cudi talked about his car being torched but no charges. I think Puff had something to do with it but what is the point of bringing Kid Cudi into court to testify about his suspicions?

Puff was/is trash and I don't think anyone deserves blame except him I just don't have clarity about what Cassie's role was. Kid Cudi seemed to have a healthy type of relationship with Cassie and she still chose to go back to Puff. She seemed to have a healthy relationship with Ryan Leslie and she chose Puff. She was grown and should make whatever choices made her happy. Puff was a violent person and an abuser. DV is terrible and Cassie should have been treated better. Looking back on this when she is currently married and pregnant doesn't seem like it is helpful. I wish he got charged for all of the incidents at the time, but sex trafficking seems like a reach. Maybe there are other witnesses or traffic victims that will help the case. The trial isn't televised. Is there a website or YouTube page that has the transcripts?
 

Westbama Heartthrob

Irregular Zero
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
11,992
Reputation
6,083
Daps
51,605
Reppin
Black Belt
I hope you never get a subpoena.

You're gonna be on the stand thinking you're a G by pleading the 5th only for the judge to order your dumb ass to answer the questions or he'll throw you in jail:mjlol:

The 5th is to keep you from incriminating yourself. It's not meant for a witness who played no part in a crime. If it was as easy as you thought no one would ever testify.
So? Clad a g :dahell:

He'd go to jail like a real nikka :wow:

Not the brightest but a real one :wow:
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
20,883
Reputation
4,577
Daps
49,317
I think he does have access to those women but he a sick nikka that got off on the violent rapes
Regular p*ssy and consensual sex wasn’t enough for him
Same thing Darren Sharper was doing. Handsome cat that could get p*ssy but got off on raping instead of it being consensual
These nikkas are different types of sickos

if you don't have consent that that means no access. period!
there's no other way to rationalize it.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,438
Reputation
5,086
Daps
70,991
It’s tricky. Cause with Diddy. All the sex shyt he was doing was personal and he didn’t hire people to SPECIFICALLY bring in escorts etc etc. he just utilized his resources from people who had other job titles. That wasn’t their purpose of being around. I just can’t see how they gonna tie this all together unless they force it. Which is possible.
It’s not tricky at all. And I don’t say this dismissively - but every time an actual lawyer gets on here and tells you guys something you guys argue back with what you think the law is and or how it should be and not how it actually works. Society would benefit as a whole from people deferring when it’s not their bag. For example, I’m not a criminal attorney specifically (other areas instead) but I’ve practiced long enough and worked with and know enough of them to where I can tell you just aren’t understanding what the standard of proof is. Your title is irrelevant.

Prostitution is illegal. Hiring sex workers is illegal. Effectively turning Cassie into a sex worker through threats of violence and kidnapping and moving her throughout the country for those ends may very well be enough. The whole case is essentially arguing that Diddy was moving people throughout the country to engage in sex worker which is illegal and that he used his money, power and influence to force compliance. All of the weird shyt he did during that isn’t really relevant and is just to make the jury think this dude is a weirdo capable of anything who needs to be locked up. It’s basically permissible character testimony. There’s nothing that says your official title needs to be “sex acquirer” to be engaging in an unlawful enterprise. You really think mob members officially job titles with made man number 6?

This is a long case so I’m not picking a side at this point but the feds have a 95 percent conviction rate for a reason. These aren’t those idiots from the Young Thug trial. Diddy’s lawyers will have to be really good.
 

Cladyclad

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
46,840
Reputation
5,192
Daps
119,550
Reppin
Detroit Lions, Michigan Wolverines & LWO
I think he does have access to those women but he a sick nikka that got off on the violent rapes

Regular p*ssy and consensual sex wasn’t enough for him

Same thing Darren Sharper was doing. Handsome cat that could get p*ssy but got off on raping instead of it being consensual

These nikkas are different types of sickos
Lol patrick you would be a expert on this

 

No Hook

Always Do The Right Thing
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
3,897
Reputation
686
Daps
16,180
Reppin
Philly
Crazy that this all this seems to stem from Diddy doin drugs and not being able to control himself

nikka was probably already a horny ass nikka anyway and the drugs elevated and took him to a deep deviant level that he couldn’t escape
 

ReasonableMatic

................................
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
19,178
Reputation
8,064
Daps
120,462
there is no “indirect” charging for attempted murder.

If they had actual evidence for that they would pursue it.

they don’t have actual evidence so they are reporting rumors and hearsay to influence the jury.

Racketeering is racketeering. If there was gun, drug, arson, attempted murder charges they could charge him with, they would have done so.

All of that stuff is brung up to attack his character and influence the jury, but if they felt they could actually prove it he would be charged with it.
For the "how this racketeering with only one person" crowd. Maybe this will be a good witness? If he getting immunity he gotta be afraid of something. Or could be nothing :manny:

Racketeering - I think the attempt to bribe the hotel employee would help with that. Then the sex trafficking would help with this too. Then throw in supplying drugs. I could be wrong though :hubie:
4d329ed0491a2cf8aec13e4a42339923.png


Extortion - He extorted 20k from cassie's parents
Blackmail - Cassie testified he would use the threat of releasing the sex tapes. shyt with her parents could fall under here as well.
Arson - Cudi's car could fall under that?
Bribery - attempt to bribe hotel worker
 
Top