THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (CASE OVER) (PROSECUTION DELCARES THEY ARE NO LONGER GOING TO ARGUE KIDNAPPING, ARSON AND SEX TRAFFICKING IN THE RICO)

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 260 63.9%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 147 36.1%

  • Total voters
    407

EzekelRAGE

Superstar
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
15,971
Reputation
3,985
Daps
55,238
The DNA part is about what? Found on the Molotov-cocktail bottle? or from the items damaged inside his house?
Could be anything. They just trying to put doubt that Puff did it himself(I dont think anyone thought that) and maybe put it in the jury's mind that Cassie did it I guess(just dumb).
 

Barney Rubble

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
3,989
Reputation
3,054
Daps
18,179
Reppin
NULL
I dont understand the first part. Why would Puffy's lawyer make a connection on how Puff couldve known Cudi's address? Him getting it from Cassie doesnt matter. May paint the picture that Cassie gave him the addy out of fear.

that 2nd post is I guess the kidnapping that the AUSA mentioned?
Yeah, if they can prove he kidnapped an innocent bystander and brought her to the scene of a crime :francis:
 

MicIsGod

They like what that mean
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
24,235
Reputation
1,689
Daps
50,489
Reppin
Atl
kid-cudi-2ed023d0c8e64ea18cb3a8544a8154d9.jpg


:mjtf:
Boy what the fukk
 

MicIsGod

They like what that mean
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
24,235
Reputation
1,689
Daps
50,489
Reppin
Atl
Funny enough, depending on the makeup of the jury, that dog shyt might fukk him over more than the shyt he did to cassie and others. Some people do not play about harm to pets. That AUSA was slick as hell to have Cudi say the dog was traumatized for that shyt :dead:
Word..guaranteed at least 10 no matter what.
 
Top