EzekelRAGE
Superstar
There is no drawing of parallels that arent there, most unbiased people are looking at the facts of the case being presented and not we think defines a charge.
If he just had FOs with willing adults, there would be no issue for him, well no sex trafficking issue.
Sex Trafficking defined by the feds
sex trafficking
www.law.cornell.edu
What makes the FOs sex trafficking/how the AUSA is framing it is the use of force and coercion for the FOs. Which is why Cassie saying the hotel video of Puff beating her because she was trying to leave a FO is worse than him just beating her normally. The escort saying he saw diddy beat cassie during a FO. This is why the prosecutor is painting a picutre of the jury of how everyone was afraid of puff.
FO will come up again because the "Jane" woman also accuses Diddy of threatening/beating her to do a FO.
Trafficking by that definition was proven the first week with Cassie imo. There's a reason the AUSA keeps using the word coercion when talking to the women.
Correct which is why they are a witness for the prosecution. The escorts could be codefendants as well since it says the providers can be held criminally liable too. They probably have immunity.
