THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (UPDATE : DIDDY ON THE YARD)

[CodeBlaMeVi]

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why wasn’t he charged with assault?

Statute of limitations

 

[Razzay]

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why wasn’t he charged with assault?

Statute of limitations,

there is even a 5 year statute on rico

 

[Razzay]

Yes that’s true but I’m saying if it was anyone else it would be considered weird even if they weren’t sleeping with them



She didn’t lie on the stand and nothing gonna happen to Cassie keep wishing for it

Strange to average joe, mid-class, or most of the general public but not as odd bedroom preferences to multi-millionaires.

 

[Leonard Washington]

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why wasn’t he charged with assault?

Statute of limitations. Happened like 9 years ago

 

[Keep_It_Hip_Hop_Fam]

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why wasn’t he charged with assault?

What everyone said plus that would be a state charge, not federal.

 

[OmegaK2099]

Maybe this is a stupid question, but why wasn’t he charged with assault?

They settled that case already

 

[Razzay]

Puff's lawyers about to go in on the MANN act Counts 3 and 5 and get em dealt with.

 

[Nigerianwonder]

Yeah Cassie is cooked. I ain't gon pretend I read all it but testimony from Diddy trial finna backfire worse for her wit details that got revealed. Escort breh sound calculated and already got it mapped wit a lawyer. I hope she ain't think she was keepin all that $20 mill settlement money lol and then that cac she wit now who probably gay gon def leave and take more. Cassie was a victim of some things but she a bad person who did bad things in her own right and she gon pay for it.

I heard that there is about 4 to 6 lawsuits in the works against Cassie already. All the escorts can sue her now based on this trial. I also head a lawyer say Diddy can sue Cassie for his settlement money back cause she and her lawyers violated the NDA by dropping statements to the media (they assumed he would be found guilty).

 

[lib123]

No where did I deny white supremacy, I live in the fukking south.
How does me going "Cassie not going to get sued because they wouldnt win, she's seen as a victim and all the escorts who testified didnt mention doing anything against their will" translate to you reading that as me going "white supremacy doesnt exist" or however the fukk you read that.

Dont fall for the dap fishing that nikka was doing with his "lol breh doesnt believe in white supremacy" bullshyt ass post. He was losing in a discussion and brought up bullshyt instead of sticking to a good point and trying to defend Vlad. It's even more funnier yall going this angle to defend fukking Vlad. The white person who has made millions off of black culture. Who was just shytting on black royalty in Marlon Wayans, not too long ago. But now dumb ass idiots are championing his opinions.

Yall can argue w/e point yall trying to make to defend Vlad with a brick wall for all I care.

Ill check back 2mrw to see if there's a verdict.

I wasn't dap fishing at all. Y'all are just clueless as to how this system actually works. Same goofies who thought Kamala was surely going to win the election. 8 months later same goofies who thought Puff was about to get found guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering. The only way that was going to happen was if Cassie was a white woman, which she isn't. I know how cacs think and there are enterprising cac lawyers who see an opportunity to get that settlement money out of Cassie and they will.

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

 

[DarkandHellisHot]

Possible Reversal of Mann Act Conviction Regarding Cassie
I have deleted my reply about the Mann Act Statute of Limitations because my post was based on another part of the Act that deals with minors. I didn't want to do a surreptitious deletion without explanation.

At any rate, if the SoL is 5 years, then I would've expected the defense to have challenged it much earlier in the case. He was indicted in September 2024. With respect to the Mann Act count regarding Cassie, the indictment says the events occurred: "From at least in or about 2009 up to and including in or about 2018..." (Count 3). With this formulation, if there was no tolling of the SoL, if the SoL is 5 years, why didn't the defense move for the dismissal of the Count 3 much earlier. Shouldn't have even been presented to the jury.

I am not sure about the 5-year SoL, and/or whether it was tolled at some point.

Beyond the SoL issue, defense can win a reversal of the Mann Act conviction relating to Cassie. Even though indictment mentioned transportation of Cassie and the sex workers, the verdict slip showed that Diddy was only convicted with respect to transporting Cassie.

While there is evidence of Diddy transporting the escorts to do FOs, and while the escorts may have engaged in prostitution, I don't think there is evidence that Cassie was transported for purpose of prostitution.

Additionally, I didn't see evidence that Cassie engaged in prostitution. Note that patronizing a prostitute is very different from prostitution. Those are 2 different crimes. Cassie may have patronized the escorts who were acting as prostitutes, but she did not engage in prostitution.

Prostitution entails person "A" performing or offering to perform a sexual act with person "B" in exchange for person "A" receiving money or its equivalent. By my recollection, there was no evidence that Cassie received money or its equivalent in exchange for doing any specific FO.

The completion of the act of prostitution is not necessary for conviction under the Mann Act. But the definition and explanation of prostitution posited above help to show that Diddy did not have the requisite intent.

Was there evidence that Diddy transported Cassie across state lines with the intent for Cassie to have sex with an escort in exchange for money (or its equivalent) to be paid to Cassie and/or Diddy? I don't think such evidence was presented, even circumstantially. Also, Diddy's enjoyment of Cassie's sex with the escorts is not money or its equivalent. Thus, there was no evidence to sustain the Mann Act conviction relating to Cassie.

By the way, I fault the defense lawyers for not suggesting a better definition of prostitution, and differentiation of patronizing a prostitute in the jury instructions. The jury could've mistakenly believed that transporting the escorts and payments to the escorts went towards proving the Mann Act count relating to Cassie. Transportation and payment of the escorts are irrelevant to transportation and/or payments to Cassie (or lack thereof).

 

[Goat poster]

shyt is stupid it’s crazy how all of a sudden he’s this dangerous killer that everyone is afraid of but only a couple years ago son was looked at as p*ssy. It’s the same thing with Will Smith after the slap. nikka turned into a bully overnight when he was generally looked at as a nice guy and shyt was all good when he was the butt of the jokes.

Neither Puff nor Will was ever p*ssy tho

They were marketable and played that role.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

My response to this person would be that the defense was more concerned with the more serious charges and knew they could address these matters at a later date.

 

[Womb Raider]

 

[Big Boss]

So diddy will be sentenced today???