THE DIDDY FEDERAL TRIAL (UPDATE : DIDDY ON THE YARD)

Whats verdict?

  • Guilty

    Votes: 298 61.1%
  • Not Guilty

    Votes: 190 38.9%

  • Total voters
    488

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
15,942
Reputation
33,124
Daps
127,411
During the federal sentencing phase, a judge has broad discretion and can consider a wide range of information — including conduct related to charges the defendant was acquitted of, as long as it meets a certain standard. Here’s a breakdown of what the judge can consider:


🔹 1.


Relevant Conduct


(Even If Acquitted)



Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.3, a judge may consider “relevant conduct” at sentencing, including:


  • Acts related to the offense of conviction
  • Acquitted conduct, if proven by a preponderance of the evidence (i.e. more likely than not — a lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt”)



So even if the defendant was acquitted of RICO and sex trafficking, the judge can still factor in the conduct underlying those charges if the judge believes the conduct occurred based on the case evidence.






🔹 2.


All Evidence Presented During Trial



  • Any testimony, exhibits, or facts established at trial, whether they relate to convicted or acquitted counts, can be considered.
  • The judge is not limited to what the jury decided — federal judges have leeway to weigh the full record.


🔹 3.


Victim Impact Statements



  • Victims can submit written or oral statements that the judge will review at sentencing.
  • Even if someone was not named in the convicted counts, if they were affected by the defendant’s conduct, their statements may still be considered.


🔹 4.


Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSR)



  • Prepared by a probation officer, this report gives the judge a full picture of the defendant’s background, prior criminal history, and details of the offense.
  • The PSR may recommend enhancements based on factors like:
    • Coercion or threats
    • Multiple victims
    • Use of force or fraud
    • Pattern of similar misconduct


🔹 5.


Aggravating or Mitigating Factors


  • The court can consider things like:
    • Lack of remorse
    • Prior good works or military service
    • Childhood trauma or mental health
    • Level of control over the victims
    • Whether the defendant played a leadership role



✅ Summary: Can Acquitted Conduct Be Used at Sentencing?


Yes — under federal law, even acquitted conduct can be used to increase a defendant’s sentence if the judge believes it happened by a preponderance of the evidence. This principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Watts, 1997).

:wow:
 

Chip Skylark

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
25,893
Reputation
5,002
Daps
72,394
During the federal sentencing phase, a judge has broad discretion and can consider a wide range of information — including conduct related to charges the defendant was acquitted of, as long as it meets a certain standard. Here’s a breakdown of what the judge can consider:


🔹 1.


Relevant Conduct


(Even If Acquitted)



Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.3, a judge may consider “relevant conduct” at sentencing, including:


  • Acts related to the offense of conviction
  • Acquitted conduct, if proven by a preponderance of the evidence (i.e. more likely than not — a lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt”)



So even if the defendant was acquitted of RICO and sex trafficking, the judge can still factor in the conduct underlying those charges if the judge believes the conduct occurred based on the case evidence.






🔹 2.


All Evidence Presented During Trial



  • Any testimony, exhibits, or facts established at trial, whether they relate to convicted or acquitted counts, can be considered.
  • The judge is not limited to what the jury decided — federal judges have leeway to weigh the full record.


🔹 3.


Victim Impact Statements



  • Victims can submit written or oral statements that the judge will review at sentencing.
  • Even if someone was not named in the convicted counts, if they were affected by the defendant’s conduct, their statements may still be considered.


🔹 4.


Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSR)



  • Prepared by a probation officer, this report gives the judge a full picture of the defendant’s background, prior criminal history, and details of the offense.
  • The PSR may recommend enhancements based on factors like:
    • Coercion or threats
    • Multiple victims
    • Use of force or fraud
    • Pattern of similar misconduct


🔹 5.


Aggravating or Mitigating Factors


  • The court can consider things like:
    • Lack of remorse
    • Prior good works or military service
    • Childhood trauma or mental health
    • Level of control over the victims
    • Whether the defendant played a leadership role



✅ Summary: Can Acquitted Conduct Be Used at Sentencing?


Yes — under federal law, even acquitted conduct can be used to increase a defendant’s sentence if the judge believes it happened by a preponderance of the evidence. This principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Watts, 1997).

:wow:

Yes — under federal law, even acquitted conduct can be used to increase a defendant’s sentence if the judge believes it happened by a preponderance of the evidence. This principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Watts, 1997).

That is crazy
 

TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY

Veteran
Verified
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
15,942
Reputation
33,124
Daps
127,411
Yes — under federal law, even acquitted conduct can be used to increase a defendant’s sentence if the judge believes it happened by a preponderance of the evidence. This principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Watts, 1997).

That is crazy


Yeah this is where mfs are getting confused. The judge can 100% give Diddy the max based off all the fukkery presented at trial.

Rejecting Diddy’s bond is looking real spooky. I wonder if nikkas gonna riot if he gets 20 :dead:
 

VegetasHairline

Veteran
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
50,783
Reputation
30,410
Daps
212,423
Reppin
CACS
Yeah this is where mfs are getting confused. The judge can 100% give Diddy the max based off all the fukkery presented at trial.

Rejecting Diddy’s bond is looking real spooky. I wonder if nikkas gonna riot if he gets 20 :dead:
People really don't understand the judge doesn't have to follow sentencing guidelines. They're advisory, not mandatory.
 

Chip Skylark

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
25,893
Reputation
5,002
Daps
72,394
Yeah this is where mfs are getting confused. The judge can 100% give Diddy the max based off all the fukkery presented at trial.

Rejecting Diddy’s bond is looking real spooky. I wonder if nikkas gonna riot if he gets 20 :dead:

Yeah Puff is about to get the book thrown at him. All signs are pointing to it.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,246
Reputation
3,646
Daps
107,649
During the federal sentencing phase, a judge has broad discretion and can consider a wide range of information — including conduct related to charges the defendant was acquitted of, as long as it meets a certain standard. Here’s a breakdown of what the judge can consider:


🔹 1.


Relevant Conduct


(Even If Acquitted)



Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.3, a judge may consider “relevant conduct” at sentencing, including:


  • Acts related to the offense of conviction
  • Acquitted conduct, if proven by a preponderance of the evidence (i.e. more likely than not — a lower standard than “beyond a reasonable doubt”)



So even if the defendant was acquitted of RICO and sex trafficking, the judge can still factor in the conduct underlying those charges if the judge believes the conduct occurred based on the case evidence.






🔹 2.


All Evidence Presented During Trial



  • Any testimony, exhibits, or facts established at trial, whether they relate to convicted or acquitted counts, can be considered.
  • The judge is not limited to what the jury decided — federal judges have leeway to weigh the full record.


🔹 3.


Victim Impact Statements



  • Victims can submit written or oral statements that the judge will review at sentencing.
  • Even if someone was not named in the convicted counts, if they were affected by the defendant’s conduct, their statements may still be considered.


🔹 4.


Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSR)



  • Prepared by a probation officer, this report gives the judge a full picture of the defendant’s background, prior criminal history, and details of the offense.
  • The PSR may recommend enhancements based on factors like:
    • Coercion or threats
    • Multiple victims
    • Use of force or fraud
    • Pattern of similar misconduct


🔹 5.


Aggravating or Mitigating Factors


  • The court can consider things like:
    • Lack of remorse
    • Prior good works or military service
    • Childhood trauma or mental health
    • Level of control over the victims
    • Whether the defendant played a leadership role



✅ Summary: Can Acquitted Conduct Be Used at Sentencing?


Yes — under federal law, even acquitted conduct can be used to increase a defendant’s sentence if the judge believes it happened by a preponderance of the evidence. This principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court (e.g., United States v. Watts, 1997).

:wow:
So, what’s the point of even waiting to 10/3/2025 for sentencing? I know it’s a schedule thing but this is f’d up at so many levels.

If no pardon, let Puff go to Club Fed so he can apply for his appeal.
 

Blessings

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
18,689
Reputation
3,264
Daps
53,118
Reppin
NULL
Great insights from on the strategy Diddy's defense team took












"This is my life, but this is your moment!"- Diddy to Teny Geragos before delivering the opening statement in the trial (which was also her first opening statement in her career)
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,927
Reputation
5,397
Daps
72,360
People really don't understand the judge doesn't have to follow sentencing guidelines. They're advisory, not mandatory.
Judges almost always follow the guidelines and if he departs from it that’s cause for an appeal, which Diddy would win. Judges don’t like getting their decisions overturned. You guys are trying to manifest something improbable.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,246
Reputation
3,646
Daps
107,649
Isn't the prevailing thought that at most the judge will give him the high end of similar cases?
He’s at liberty to consider whatever he considers relevant evidence whether found guilty or acquitted. So, the Cassie video for instance can have as much weight as he sees appropriate even though that happened nearly 10 years ago and served more time for that now had he been arrested then. There’s no fairness going on and it’s strings being pulled behind the scenes.
 
Top