So what exactly are you trying to say. that He should compromise his values, bend the knee and become another neo liberal hack just like 98 percent of Democratic establishmentNo shyt. That's what I'm trying to say.

So what exactly are you trying to say. that He should compromise his values, bend the knee and become another neo liberal hack just like 98 percent of Democratic establishmentNo shyt. That's what I'm trying to say.

Bernie not a Democrat. What did you expect?
I don't have any sympathy for him.![]()
but ultimately she played ball and got out. Bernie had less support in 2016 than Hilary had in 2008 but he somehow convinced an army of neckbeards that he was robbed of an election (that he should’ve backed out of anyway if he was a real Democrat) and that contributed heavily to Trump winning.He’s not. The more I think about it, he’s kinda selfish. Hilary COULD'VE acted the way Bernie acted in 2016 back in 2008. Instead she stepped aside and got behind Obama. People ignore this for whatever reason but she could’ve easily been like fukk that guy and fukk the Dems. I’m staying in. Bernie had less support in 2016 than Hilary had in 2008 but he somehow convinced an army of neckbeards that he was robbed of an election (that he should’ve backed out of anyway if he was a real Democrat) and that contributed heavily to Trump winning.
So what exactly are you trying to say. that He should compromise his values, bend the knee and become another neo liberal hack just like 98 percent of Democratic establishment![]()

Because no candidate has ever won the presidency as an independent![]()
Dude would be the first one bytching if Bernie ran as an independent and handed trump the election on a silver platter.No shyt. That's what I'm trying to say.
He still needs the platform to win. That's what I'm talking about.Bernie has been raising his own resources, voting with Democrats and helping Democrats win elections, what the fukk are you talking about.
Hillary was far worse than Bernie was in 2008, she refused to back out at the convention and refused to concede until she got a prominent position in his cabinet.He’s not. The more I think about it, he’s kinda selfish. Hilary COULD'VE acted the way Bernie acted in 2016 back in 2008.

And the Democrats still need independents to win, so what the fukk is your point?He still needs the platform to win. That's what I'm talking about.
Thank you. The democratic establishment still haven't forgiven Nadler for running as independent in 2004 (I believe) till this day.Dude would be the first one bytching if Bernie ran as an independent and handed trump the election on a silver platter.
Hillary was far worse than Bernie was in 2008, she refused to back out at the convention and refused to concede until she got a prominent position in his cabinet.
I swear some of yall just started paying attention to politics last week with these statements.
Because a third party is not viable in a 2 party system practised in America.Why doesn't Bernie and the Progressives start their own party?
Instead of bytching about the Democrats all of the time.
Why vote Democrat if you hate them so much?
My fukking point is, if you are using the Democratic platform to further your campaign you are part of a "club". That club has norms and rules as any other. Attacking "the establishment" and painting yourself as an outsider that wants to destroy them(ie the DNC or just people in general who help uphold the Democratic Party's support structure) won't bring you support. So complaining that the DNC is "colluding" against Bernie is dumb.And the Democrats still need independents to win, so what the fukk is your point?
Because a third party is not viable in a 2 party system practised in America.
Why are you defending the establishmentBernie and the Progressives are about a so-called revolution.
A revolution doesn't happen overnight.
How are you going to be against the establishment but want to use the establishment platform.
do you hate that bald old jew that much