Terry Crews said in a article that he didn't see race.
Terry Crews: How to Be an Honest, Sensitive Man
He don't wanna ride, he wanna get rich and hide.
Lets me add up these figures breh
So I learned in trigonometry that there is a part of the penis called foreskin and I know that in general the penis is definitely covered with flesh. But I learned in astronomy a grown man usually reacts to a man giving his meat a friendly handshake. fukk I didnt study for this man
After some real deep soul searching I think im going to have to go with a penis qualifies as skin for 500 Bob.![]()
This infuriates me. How can u guys make light of this?? This man was sexually assaulted and shamed into silence. He finally speaks up and no one, not even his tribe of Black men, supports him. This is exactly why victims stay silent!! This is not only sexism against men, but, once again, these devils refuse to see Black men as vulnerable and in need of help. That is so dehumanizing.
If you really think about it, the #metoo shyt seems like a deflection/distraction to the pedophilia that’s said to run rampant in Hollywood and low key society as a whole. I don’t think that anyone defends men like Harvey Weinstein but from everything that we’ve heard about him he was dealing with grown women. I haven’t heard any accusations that he was involved with the real “open secret” in Hollywood which is pedophilia.
Isn’t it strange how the #metoo Hollywood movement stops short of going after and exposing the pedophiles and the culture of pedophilia? All of these women speaking up for themselves but nobody is speaking up for the children. We see the same thing in mainstream society with the epidemic of women teachers molesting/raping their students. Actually it’s not strange because it’s obviously deliberate. Gender is being used as a deflection as it always is. Liberals are completely full of shyt. They don’t give a fukk about sex abuse victims, they’re just using abuse to push their agendas.
Don't juelz me. That's the exact same thing because if I think Will Smith would act different depending on the person and consequence, so will the Exec and other folks that knows the consequences.The question isn't would Will Smith slap an exec, the question is, would an exec think he could sexually assault Will Smith without repercussions?
How did Terry Crews come out on the end of all of this? At any phase of his metoo moment did he get a win?
#WhenKeepingitbytchmadeGoesWrong
I don't understand how in this situation, it's now acceptable to ignore details like "consequences of action", in order to paint this Crews' situation with a "Blackman being violated" broad bush. Then proceed to compare every situation of a "Blackman being violated" to Crew's situation...I thought there were levels to everything. I guess that doesn't apply when you have narrative to pushHow the fukk would you know? You're not a black actor cavorting around evil men. That shyt goes out the window when you reach a certain level
You're sloppily comparing your experience dealing within a company with the experience of dealing with an industry. Despite the billion dollar label, don't you see how important context is?Not all Black men in Hollywood are getting punked like Crews. Those same evil people in Hollywood, would be evil in whatever position or career they would have in life. Nobody was forcing Terry Crews to stay in Hollywood and be an actor. Terry Crews suffers from the insecurity of being a mid-tier actor who tries so hard to be disarming, that he comes across as soft. He's passive in front of white executives, But he's one of those that would try to rip a Black man's head off if he looked at him too long. Notice how I posted the quote earlier about him not seeing color but was quick to throw Black people under the bus and blaming Black culture for him not speaking up sooner....
A personal story, I used to work at Hallmark Cards and an old white lady in my department thought it was cool to call me sambo, because my real name is Samuel. I checked her right then and there and went about my business. Word got back to our supervisor and he reported her. But that didn't stop her, so I went to HR and she ended up getting fired. I knew by reporting her that I was going to lose my job as well, so I recorded everything and wrote everything down and within a month of her being fired, I got "laid off" Long story short, I sued, won some money, a lot going to the lawyer and they ended up firing the 3 other people involved.
Now Hallmark Cards is a billion dollar industry, and I met with some of the top execs at Hallmark during arbitration. No fear, I had no reason to be afraid because I had to be able to look myself in the mirror everyday and know that a man was staring back. A man who stood up for himself and didn't wait for anybody else's wave to jump on.
And by the way, I had the choice of staying at Hallmark, but without a guarantee of not being laid off, or take a settlement, but could never work at Hallmark ever again. I took the money because Hallmark doesn't define me as a Black man or as an artist.
Nor should you because you got in over your head and now just trying to save face and move goalposts in order to make the data fit your argument.I said imagine yourself in his shoes. That's not the same as saying he's famous so his problems are much bigger than yours. I just re-read my replies. No where did I boost his truimphs over your tragedies. Also your experience with Hallmark isn't the same as Terry's experience in Hollywood. You were dealing with some random co worker, he was dealing with someone high up. I'm not going to.continue this argument.
Don't juelz me. That's the exact same thing because if I think Will Smith would act different depending on the person and consequence, so will the Exec and other folks that knows the consequences.
So your new question is just a deflection from acknowledging that these are two different situations, if you choose not to account for the distinct consequences
But are the same situation, if you are generically talmbowt Blackmen dealing with sus cacs
Notice how many people are in this thread confidently saying that Crews finna get blackballed, despite not working in the industry. Why? because there're enough proof of the consequences that has Black people censoring their actions accordingly, aka conditioning
I don't understand how in this situation, it's now acceptable to ignore details like "consequences of action", in order to paint this Crews' situation with a "Blackman being violated" broad bush. Then proceed to compare every situation of a "Blackman being violated" to Crew's situation...I thought there were levels to everything. I guess that doesn't apply when you have narrative to push
You're sloppily comparing your experience dealing within a company with the experience of dealing with an industry. Despite the billion dollar label, don't you see how important context is?
Now it all makes since why you're purposely ignoring details of Crews' situation and forcing comparisons to other situations involving Blackmen dealing with sus cacs
You went through something that worked out in your favor, so now you're irresponsibly behaving like you've discovers the one-size-fits-all solution for Blackmen dealing with sus cacs. Also I notice you're conveniently not comparing him to other sexual assault cases, so that hints at some male ego tug of war happening with you
The problem is the motives and reasoning behind all your post is dependent on being deliberately obtuse, just for your "solution" to be portrayed as correct
- despite saying the bolded, I guarantee that you would still say "Hollywood has white supremacist double standards"
-despite the court system ruling in your favor, I guarantee that you would still call the court system corrupt and against Blackfolks, even though you and Crews had evidence to your cases
-I'm going to ask you again just to prove how deceitful your're moving in this thread. Would you advise a Blackman to have the dignity and pride to aggressively confront a white man that's telling him to shutup...when he's a regular cac OR when he's cac pig OR both?
In other words, maintaining perspective is extremely important so to not be easily manipulated and distracted
ok. So stop dodging and answer the question.The irony
![]()
Okay since you're having a hard time grasping what I'm saying and you want to be the advocate for Terry Crews that he couldn't be for himself, let me tell you again.
I have shown you two examples of where violations were handled in a different way than what Crews was able to do. IT DOESN'T FUKKING MATTER WHO'S DISRESPECTING YOU, AS A GROWN ASS MAN, YOU DON'T HAVE TO SIT THERE AND TAKE IT!! And then sit in silence for a whole year.
The issue is, when push comes to shove, how are you going to respond.
Nah she white. She got some hard facial features and add the "I fukk nikkas" haircut
Agreed. Like I said, black men should have the most sympathy from their own race, but they don't. Obviously what happened to him fukked him up totally. And breh was saying that he tried to appease cacs by being "safe". Maybe Crews is showing his true personality? You have to have a level of emotional awareness when you're an actor. Aside from that, Crews is also a fine artist who paints. Not saying he is soft, but what I'm saying is this dude really was violated and fukked up about it,and calling him a p*ssy/c00n for not retaliating is unfair and disrespectful and ignorant.Don't juelz me. That's the exact same thing because if I think Will Smith would act different depending on the person and consequence, so will the Exec and other folks that knows the consequences.
So your new question is just a deflection from acknowledging that these are two different situations, if you choose not to account for the distinct consequences
But are the same situation, if you are generically talmbowt Blackmen dealing with sus cacs
Notice how many people are in this thread confidently saying that Crews finna get blackballed, despite not working in the industry. Why? because there're enough proof of the consequences that has Black people censoring their actions accordingly, aka conditioning
I don't understand how in this situation, it's now acceptable to ignore details like "consequences of action", in order to paint this Crews' situation with a "Blackman being violated" broad bush. Then proceed to compare every situation of a "Blackman being violated" to Crew's situation...I thought there were levels to everything. I guess that doesn't apply when you have narrative to push
You're sloppily comparing your experience dealing within a company with the experience of dealing with an industry. Despite the billion dollar label, don't you see how important context is?
Now it all makes since why you're purposely ignoring details of Crews' situation and forcing comparisons to other situations involving Blackmen dealing with sus cacs
You went through something that worked out in your favor, so now you're irresponsibly behaving like you've discovers the one-size-fits-all solution for Blackmen dealing with sus cacs. Also I notice you're conveniently not comparing him to other sexual assault cases, so that hints at some male ego tug of war happening with you
The problem is the motives and reasoning behind all your post is dependent on being deliberately obtuse, just for your "solution" to be portrayed as correct
- despite saying the bolded, I guarantee that you would still say "Hollywood has white supremacist double standards"
-despite the court system ruling in your favor, I guarantee that you would still call the court system corrupt and against Blackfolks, even though you and Crews had evidence to your cases
-I'm going to ask you again just to prove how deceitful your're moving in this thread. Would you advise a Blackman to have the dignity and pride to aggressively confront a white man that's telling him to shutup...when he's a regular cac OR when he's cac pig OR both?
In other words, maintaining perspective is extremely important so to not be easily manipulated and distracted