The Ghost of Cornel West (Michael Eric Dyson article/long read)

zerozero

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,865
Reputation
1,290
Daps
13,514
West was just warming up. After a fiftieth anniversary celebration of the 1963 March on Washington on the National Mall, a celebration Sharpton led and at which I spoke, West argued that Martin Luther King Jr. “would’ve been turning over in his grave” at Sharpton’s “coronation” as the “bona fide house negro of the Obama plantation,” supported by “the Michael Dysons and others who’ve really prostituted themselves intellectually in a very, very ugly and vicious way.” And recently, while promoting Black Prophetic Fire, West argued “the Sharptons, the Melissa Harris-Perrys, and the Michael Eric Dysons ... end up being these cheerleaders and bootlickers for the President, and I think it’s a disgrace when it comes to the black prophetic tradition of Malcolm and Martin.”

:mjlol: @ Michael Eric Dyson being in the lab cooking up the ether in this lengthy article for two years.
 

Kritic

Banned
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
8,937
Reputation
475
Daps
5,893
Reppin
NULL
http://yourblackworld.net/2015/04/20/dr-boyce-watkins-when-dyson-attacks-west-we-all-end-up-losing/

Michael Eric Dyson recently wrote an article about Cornel West that I can only describe as critical and surprising. In the article, Dyson questions Cornel West’s commitment to true scholarship, as well as his seemingly shifty political disposition. Personally, I don’t think that the black community benefits from this kind of back and forth, and it’s my hope that the New Republic will use its platform to allow for more productive conversations about the state of black America.


My thoughts on the topic are in the video below or you can listen to the downloadable podcast.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,924
Reppin
Behind You
Reading what work? That is one of the points of the article. Dude does not produce any scholarship anymore. You also said "besides being charmed by Bill Clinton." Bill Clinton was the last Democratic president. It's not exactly hard to go hard on Bush.
West just released a new book in October.
And he has been critical of Bill Clinton. In his interviews where he launched criticisms at Obama they were usually couched in his criticism of Bill Clinton, calling Obama a "brown-face Bill Clinton" and saying Obama was "just as centrist and manipulative and opportunistic as Bill Clinton". And labeling Hillary Clinton as a war criminal and saying she is just as bad as Henry Kissinger strikes me as being critical of the top level Democrats.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
71,909
Reputation
11,610
Daps
242,168
hqdefault.jpg


I look at this above image of black scholars past while thinking of the current crop of black academics/sports analysts/known writers, you name it and I get sick to my gut. They're all about the spotlight of self, not sharing it or having a healthy debate or disagreement amongst each other.

It's not about the betterment of the people. It's all about crowding the platform for themselves and being the "only negro in the room" where their and their thoughts alone are being heard, not challenged or questioned in a room full of peers.

All these dudes are shyt. There's a great writer on this site who wrote a scathing article which was liked by ones of these "black academics/sports analysts/known writer" types. But instead of using his platform to broadcast the article, this "black academics/sports analysts/known writer" type decided to DM the writer and tell him, "good job." :stopitslime:

All of these dudes are about ego and are too arrogant to even challenge each other in a room together. At the end...we lose.

I'm sick of em all.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,053
Daps
641,702
Reppin
The Deep State
West just released a new book in October.
And he has been critical of Bill Clinton. In his interviews where he launched criticisms at Obama they were usually couched in his criticism of Bill Clinton, calling Obama a "brown-face Bill Clinton" and saying Obama was "just as centrist and manipulative and opportunistic as Bill Clinton". And labeling Hillary Clinton as a war criminal and saying she is just as bad as Henry Kissinger strikes me as being critical of the top level Democrats.
According to Dyson, it doesnt count since he used a co-writer :troll:
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,835
West has repeatedly declared that he did 65 engagements for the presidential campaign in 2008, and was offended when the president didn’t provide tickets to the inauguration. (Obama later told me in the White House that West left several voice messages, including prayers, from a blocked number with no instructions of where to return the call, a routine with which I was all too familiar.)

:dahell:
 

Claudex

Lord have mercy!
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
6,419
Reputation
4,222
Daps
19,342
Reppin
Motherland
:dwillhuh::wtf:
AYE AYE!! THIS nikka DYSON GOT THE AK!!!! :damn:
THEM MAGAZINES AIN'T FINISHING, WHERE THEY DO THAT AT?!!!!:damn:
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,665
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,538
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
I'm hungover like shyt, so please excuse my post if it comes off as a bunch of rambling….

The first thought I had when I read the article was "why the fukk is there an article about Cornel West?" In my opinion, the shyt was pointless. Who the fukk really cares about the West-Dyson-Obama feud, in 2015, aside from West, Dyson and Obama?

Secondly, I couldn't read that entire article. shyt was way too fukkn long. I thought I was reading a mini autobiography of West.

I do believe that Dyson made some salient points about Cornel's work ethic and/or academic record one the past 20years. I understand the picture that Dyson creates by juxtaposing Cornel's past and present image in the academic world. I get that.

But I don't think many democrats/progressives who are critics of Obama actually CARED about that part of Cornel's legacy. But Dyson does, because as much as this is a critique of Cornel, it is a validation of Dyson's status.

What it comes down to are 2 things: Does Cornel have the right to levy racial ad-homs at Obama? No - hell fukkn no.

Does Cornel have a right to press everyone who doesn't openly speak about the bankers and military hawks within the White House? Yes. I don't know why people are so hard pressed to understand this? Those of us who truly despise oligarchs, who truly despise war, who truly despise the level of indifference shown for the black/brown/native/chinese experience in the US, will NEVER be okay with people who aren't "peripheral prophets." I don't think Dyson understands this at all, choosing to talk about Wests thoughts on nihilism and celebrity and not his views on war, poverty and the new/old jim crow. In fact, Dyson links us to Wests criticism about Obama using MLK's bible, and that 5minute clip alone trumps this entire article.

How can you be about social uplift and marching for justice, yet canoodle with the architects of the PIC? You're about peace and you model yourself after MLK - yet you know that the Vietnam War was a major issue of his and still remain silent on drone strikes? You believe racism is still alive, you understand that ghettos were social experiments and tools of white supremacy, but when the financial system collapses and black families are the ones disproportionately hit by subprime mortgages, you're still cool hob snubbing with bank execs?

It's gonna be a sight to see when black intellectuals no longer have the level of visibility that they've grown accustomed to over the past 8 years with a black man in the White House. They're in for a rude awakening…..
 

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,203
Reputation
13,837
Daps
171,262
Reppin
Pawgistan
Aside from his being charmed by Bill Clinton, West tends to criticize every president and powerful leader of the 2 party system. He called Hillary a war criminal just last fall.

Sure he was probably personally hurt by the Inauguration snub and he has a certain amount of attention whoring that all pundits are guilty of but I still enjoy watching/reading his work.

And I also think he tends to go harder on criticizing Obama because he (rightly) perceives all the rest of the black political pundit class on the Left doing nothing but carrying water for the President and not criticizing him at all.

Main thing I don't like about Cornell West is he's pro integration.
 

Claudex

Lord have mercy!
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
6,419
Reputation
4,222
Daps
19,342
Reppin
Motherland
Does Cornel have a right to press everyone who doesn't openly speak about the bankers and military hawks within the White House? Yes. I don't know why people are so hard pressed to understand this? Those of us who truly despise oligarchs, who truly despise war, who truly despise the level of indifference shown for the black/brown/native/chinese experience in the US, will NEVER be okay with people who aren't "peripheral prophets." I don't think Dyson understands this at all, choosing to talk about Wests thoughts on nihilism and celebrity and not his views on war, poverty and the new/old jim crow. In fact, Dyson links us to Wests criticism about Obama using MLK's bible, and that 5minute clip alone trumps this entire article.

How can you be about social uplift and marching for justice, yet canoodle with the architects of the PIC? You're about peace and you model yourself after MLK - yet you know that the Vietnam War was a major issue of his and still remain silent on drone strikes? You believe racism is still alive, you understand that ghettos were social experiments and tools of white supremacy, but when the financial system collapses and black families are the ones disproportionately hit by subprime mortgages, you're still cool hob snubbing with bank execs?

It's gonna be a sight to see when black intellectuals no longer have the level of visibility that they've grown accustomed to over the past 8 years with a black man in the White House. They're in for a rude awakening…..

I believe Dyson's point was that Doc West has a right to do anything he wants; but not without putting in the work nor without he running risks of doing what real progressivists and prophets do. 'Cause, to answer the bolded: the point there wasn't about whether people prefer peripheral prophets vs central prophets. It's obvious the disenfranchised will always prefer the peripheral prophets. But...IF you're willing to be the central prophet (as it appears the Doc wants to be when he gets upset by not being privy to the WH anymore) then you can't just talk to the power holders like you're peripheral otherwise :ufdup:.

In a way I kinda have to agree...when a man is out there running his mouth without putting much at risk his words lose weight. And in that regard Dr. West doen't look that unfamiliar.
 
Top