Lakerman0834
Veteran
Kobe had Pau, Bynum, Lamar, Ariza/Artest, and Fish during those 2009 and 2010 championship runs.
The nerve of anyone to act like these Laker championship teams weren't super talented beyond their superstars.
And I could probably argue that Pau is an all-time great big men. It's not too much of a reach. Shiiiiiet, for the modern big man, he's a damn near gawd. Stop frontin.
And Bynum was having a breakout year during that 30-16 start. Point blank, Kobe has done no more with the talent around him than any other great player.
Those teams aint as talented as Pippen/Jordan/Rodman/Kukoc or Bosh/Bron/Wade Kobe won wit a bunch of losers/underachievers
are u serious?
Please don't make Bynum out to be more then he actually was, he was a role player nothing more nothing less(like ariza in 09') so was odom who's a bench guy. Fish was... Fish
I'm just saying they weren't garbage.
I actually thought it made a difference just to have him on the court in 2010 during Game 7 while Kendrick was riding that pine. 





) Kobe would've stayed with the Hornets, he would've finished his rookie contract with no ships and then signed to none other than...the Lakers--because let's face it, players are attracted to winning organizations
This is disgusting.
You're arguing that just by being in Kobe Bryant's presence, nikkas ball better.
I'm not saying he doesn't make his teammates better, but you are going too far. 

winning without dominant bigs