'The Hunger Games' Gay Agenda...

[FrederickDouglas]

whats different about the two

Besides the obvious difference between sexual preference and race, where are the gay water fountains? Where are the police spraying gay people with firehoses? Where are the buses that gay people have to sit in the back of? How about gay-only schools?

Who says gay people can't marry? A gay person is free to marry just as a straight person is...it just has to be a member of the opposite sex, just like with a straight person. That's why you have so many downlow nikkas because they're gay and in a relationship with a woman, giving her STDs (on second thought, maybe gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry period ).

So what rights don't they have again?

 

[Dre Space Age]

Oh wow now I don't even wanna watch this shyt.

 

[5n0man]

Besides the obvious difference between sexual preference and race, where are the gay water fountains? Where are the police spraying gay people with firehoses? Where are the buses that gay people have to sit in the back of? How about gay-only schools?

Who says gay people can't marry? A gay person is free to marry just as a straight person is...it just has to be a member of the opposite sex, just like with a straight person. That's why you have so many downlow nikkas because they're gay and in a relationship with a woman, giving her STDs (on second thought, maybe gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry period ).

So what rights don't they have again?

yeah, im pretty sure that dudes white after that comment

 

[Kings County]

Besides the obvious difference between sexual preference and race, where are the gay water fountains? Where are the police spraying gay people with firehoses? Where are the buses that gay people have to sit in the back of? How about gay-only schools?

Who says gay people can't marry? A gay person is free to marry just as a straight person is...it just has to be a member of the opposite sex, just like with a straight person. That's why you have so many downlow nikkas because they're gay and in a relationship with a woman, giving her STDs (on second thought, maybe gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry period ).

So what rights don't they have again?

i meant in terms of fighting for their freedoms america is more civilized now u cant just go around hosing people plus their are discrimination laws u think if they didnt put in discrimination laws people still would have white only fountains and shyt they'd just be straight only diners etc.

we went through it so they didn't have to

 

[NoMayo15]

Besides the obvious difference between sexual preference and race, where are the gay water fountains? Where are the police spraying gay people with firehoses? Where are the buses that gay people have to sit in the back of? How about gay-only schools?

Who says gay people can't marry? A gay person is free to marry just as a straight person is...it just has to be a member of the opposite sex, just like with a straight person. That's why you have so many downlow nikkas because they're gay and in a relationship with a woman, giving her STDs (on second thought, maybe gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry period ).

So what rights don't they have again?

Okay so you would have us force gays to marry a gender they aren't attracted to, then have the nerve to get mad when they cheat and spread STD's.

 

[up in here]

Besides the obvious difference between sexual preference and race, where are the gay water fountains? Where are the police spraying gay people with firehoses? Where are the buses that gay people have to sit in the back of? How about gay-only schools?

Who says gay people can't marry? A gay person is free to marry just as a straight person is...it just has to be a member of the opposite sex, just like with a straight person. That's why you have so many downlow nikkas because they're gay and in a relationship with a woman, giving her STDs (on second thought, maybe gay people shouldn't be allowed to marry period ).

So what rights don't they have again?

LMAO at the bolded. So you say a gay man is allowed to marry a woman but maybe he shouldn't be allowed to. If someone is downlow, how would you even know they were gay in the first place? me personally, i hate downlow brothers. but maybe if we let them marry who they want they wouldn't feel the need to fit in to male-female relationships and they would feel comfortable just being gay.

I do agree that gay and Black are no-where even close to being the same, however I'm not ignorant to the fact that gays have had their own type of discrimination at times and some are the victims of hate crimes. in no way would i say it equates with what Black folk have endured though. its two completely different things.

but on the real, why are some f you afraid of catching homosexuality? if your not gay, you are not going to be turned gay by some gay characters in a movie

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

in no way would i say it equates with what Black folk have endured though. its two completely different things.
e

It's not about some contest of who's faced more discrimination and injustice, its about the fact that discrimination and injustice are wrong period, at any level, to any extent, and the fact that you have people that are members of a group that have faced discrimination in the past now seeing no problem with discrimination happening to another group, is so ironic and selfish that it's just sad.

 

[Soundwave]

It's not about some contest of who's faced more discrimination and injustice, its about the fact that discrimination and injustice are wrong period, at any level, to any extent, and the fact that you have people that are members of a group that have faced discrimination in the past now seeing no problem with discrimination happening to another group, is so ironic and selfish that it's just sad.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Man, let these dudes know, breh. As the proud author of a comic strip starring two openly gay characters, surely you must sympathize with their struggle?

 

[Bud Bundy]

if none of yall motherfukkers are gay why is this even a discussion?

 

[FrederickDouglas]

It's not about some contest of who's faced more discrimination and injustice, its about the fact that discrimination and injustice are wrong period, at any level, to any extent, and the fact that you have people that are members of a group that have faced discrimination in the past now seeing no problem with discrimination happening to another group, is so ironic and selfish that it's just sad.

Discrimination is fine. It's just the basis of your discrimination that determines whether it is legitimate or not. Discrimination is not wrong in and of itself.

Discrimination based on the color of one's skin is definitely wrong. Discrimination based on a person's sexual fetish is not, especially if you view it to be wrong or immoral and they publicize it. If you choose to discriminate against the dude who likes having sex with his dog, there's nothing wrong with you.

Injustice is wrong. It's unjust to judge a person on the color of their skin. But to correlate that type of injustice with judgment of homosexuals is stretching it...especially since a lot of people consider it "unjust" that homosexuality is permitted.

 

[Fillerguy]

Discrimination based on the color of one's skin is definitely wrong. Discrimination based on a person's sexual fetish is not, especially if you view it to be wrong or immoral and they publicize it. If you choose to discriminate against the dude who likes having sex with his dog, there's nothing wrong with you.

Ignoring how you fail to explain why discriminating based on skin color, are laws forbidding interracial dating wrong? If you can define "gay", something immaterial and internal, as a fetish you can most definitely define "skin color", something external and superficial, as a fetish. st0rmfr0nt type dudes been complaining about the media pushing interracial relationships for decades.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Discrimination based on the color of one's skin is definitely wrong. Discrimination based on a person's sexual fetish is not

 

[IGSaint12]

Discrimination is fine. It's just the basis of your discrimination that determines whether it is legitimate or not. Discrimination is not wrong in and of itself.

Discrimination based on the color of one's skin is definitely wrong. Discrimination based on a person's sexual fetish is not, especially if you view it to be wrong or immoral and they publicize it. If you choose to discriminate against the dude who likes having sex with his dog, there's nothing wrong with you.

Injustice is wrong. It's unjust to judge a person on the color of their skin. But to correlate that type of injustice with judgment of homosexuals is stretching it...especially since a lot of people consider it "unjust" that homosexuality is permitted.

Do you know what the definition of discrimination is? Discrimination is self explanatory there are no loopholes, if someone is denied their rights as a human being that is discrimination.

Are people gonna start making shyt up now?

And not only that but making discrimination subjective with an opinion of that some discrimination is fine is ludicrous. Where does it stop? If gay discrimination is fine to you then black discrimination would be fine to some white ceo who does not want a black guy working for his company. Maybe that white ceo finds black people to be immoral, mormons already think black people have black skin because of the evil they have done(or whatever it was about).

 

[Mowgli]

The promotion and glorification of homosex is white culture. Thats why a cac ran the society in hunger games. Most mn around the world of all ra es are disgusted by fakkits but for some reasom the european and people he integrates with mbrace it. Its so demonic.