The "Kobe was a sidekick" argument needs to stop

Cyber

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
1,023
Reputation
390
Daps
3,991
Reppin
Tennessee
Depending on who you ask Kobe either gets too much credit or not enough credit for his first three titles, you rarely find a middle ground.

If by sidekick we mean 2nd best player, that's not a debate. It's hard to call 01 and arguably 02 Kobe a sidekick in the traditional sense though, and yet that's how Kobe gets viewed when discussing his place among the greats. Robin didn't rival Batman at anything and yet in the 1st 3 rounds both Kobe and Shaq were playing at a similar level. And in the finals outside of his awful game 1 Kobe contributed 27/9/6 in their remaining games, not the 30/15/5 average Shaq put up in their wins but not too shabby either.

I don't have a problem with 2000 getting shafted, and I honestly don't put too much stock in his 2002 ring, but he should get credit for 2001.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
60,894
Reputation
-20,370
Daps
78,934
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
who won the 3 finals MVP awards?

who scored 8 points on 4-20 shooting in the NBA finals?

it was Shaq's team


JORDAN SHOT 5-19 IN THE FINAL GAME OF THE 1996 NBA FINALS, YOUNG HACKELINI...WHATS YA POINT?


KOBE-SHAQ=THE GREATEST 1-2 PUNCH EVER. NEITHER WAS A SIDEKICK. SHAQ HAD SENIORITY BECAUSE OF AGE, AND THAT IS ALL.
 

NatiboyB

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
65,187
Reputation
3,905
Daps
103,578
Sidekicks don't average 28-30 points per season

You want to give Shaq all the credit. You want Shaq to be the HNIC of the Lakers. Fine. Then that fat muthafukka should have won rings with Eddie Jones and Nick Van Exel.....average shooting guards no one would have thought twice about but, instead he had to wait until the second GOAT shooting guard got good enough to help him :scust: You can't have it both ways :scust:


But at one point he was a sidekick their is no refuting that.
 

smitty22

Is now part of Thee Alliance. Ill die for this ish
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
67,895
Reputation
37,267
Daps
225,449
Shaq wouldn't have won more than one championship without Kobe... It's already been proven.

Shaq was the most "dominant" player in the series because of his opposition... But Who did he play against directly? Vlade? Smitts? Ratliff? Mutumbo? How hard was it to drop 30 on them nikkas?

Yet Kobe was playing the best guards and then playing DEFENSE on the best guards... Even when they lost to the Pistons he was making life hell for Rip Hamilton..


Shaq didn't even win shyt with Penny, Jones, Van Exel, etc... He didn't even win shyt when he tried to piggy back with Lebronze

Shaq is great, don't get me wrong. But he wasn't a champion until he met Kobe and if people don't understand that then they're most likely borderline retarded when it comes to basketball :manny:
Who were these best guards Kobe was going against?
 

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,949
Reputation
7,480
Daps
127,125
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
All I know is when the Lakers played the Spurs in the PS, Kobe was often the best player on their team. Used to terrorize them and was a killer in the 4th particularly in that 02 semifinals.

Kobe had the better match up against the Spurs those two seasons. Of course Shaq was gonna take a backseat being guarded by Robinson AND Duncan
 

the artist known az

Hail the victors
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
41,582
Reputation
6,427
Daps
99,685
Reppin
TSC FA' Life #ByrdGang
Don't everyone consider Pippen a sidekick?
full


Jordan couldn't win until Pippen became a perennial All Star
full


Jordan has the Finals MVPs he gets the credit :mjpls:

Shaq got the Finals MVPs, yall want Kobe to give credit :dwillhuh:

Sorry but Kobe was a sidekick
full
 
Top