The Last Days of Taliban Head Mullah Omar

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
326,465
Reputation
-34,104
Daps
633,235
Reppin
The Deep State



The Last Days of Taliban Head Mullah Omar
The Last Days of Taliban Head Mullah Omar
WASHINGTON—Mullah Mohammad Omar, the founder of the Taliban, lived in hiding near a U.S. base in southern Afghanistan until his death, according to a new research-group report that contradicts long-held theories by U.S. officials about the notorious one-eyed leader.

The consensus among experts, including at the Central Intelligence Agency, was that Mullah Omar fled to Pakistan after the U.S. ousted the Taliban following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks orchestrated by al Qaeda, which operated in Afghanistan under the Taliban’s protection.

The new report, reviewed exclusively by The Wall Street Journal, provides a detailed picture of Mullah Omar’s final years spent mostly in seclusion in Afghanistan, not Pakistan. The report contends he lived with his bodyguard, Jabbar Omari, receiving infrequent visits from a messenger who traveled every few months between his location and the Taliban’s decision-making body in Quetta, Pakistan.

The report is due to be published in the coming days by the Zomia Center, a research group in New York affiliated with New America, a Washington-based nonpartisan think tank. The research relies on interviews with some previously inaccessible sources, including current and former members of the Afghan government, the Afghan intelligence agency, the Taliban and Mullah Omar’s bodyguard, Mr. Omari, who protected him until his death and now lives under house arrest in Kabul.

The Taliban hid news of Mullah Omar’s death for more than two years, until it was revealed by the Afghan intelligence agency in 2015.

The suggestion that U.S. intelligence assessments about Mullah Omar may have been in error comes as the U.S. holds talks with the Taliban’s political office to end the war that began with the post-9/11 U.S. invasion. Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s top representative in the talks, was among Mullah Omar’s close friends.

“The report shows that the U.S. got one of the biggest claims about the war wrong, and it also shows how little we understand the Taliban movement,” the report’s author, Bette Dam, said in an interview. Ms. Dam is a Dutch journalist who has spent years reporting from Afghanistan and searching for the Taliban’s elusive leader and has written about her experiences in a book released this month in the Netherlands.

The CIA declined to comment.

David Petraeus, a former CIA director and a onetime U.S. military commander in Afghanistan and Iraq, said it seemed unlikely that Mullah Omar remained in Afghanistan, where he could have been more easily targeted.

“We had access, as needed, to anywhere inside Afghanistan, and I would be very surprised if Mullah Omar would have taken the risk that we could come calling some evening,” Mr. Petraeus said in an interview.

Mr. Petraeus had noted previously that the U.S. not only believed Mullah Omar was in Pakistan, but also had an idea of his movements between Baluchistan province and the metropolis of Karachi on the south coast, where he was believed to have been treated in a hospital.

The U.S. has long hunted members of the Taliban and al Qaeda, often blaming Pakistan for sheltering them. Pakistan denies helping insurgent groups, even though top members have been found on its soil.

U.S. forces located al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden near a military base in Pakistan and killed him in 2011. The U.S. also killed the Taliban’s new leader, Mullah Akhtar Mansour, with a drone strike in Pakistan in 2016.

Mullah Omar proved elusive to U.S. searchers. Until the announcement of his death, there had been no audio or video recordings for years.

The Zomia Center report says that Mullah Omar in late 2001 handed over the Taliban’s daily operations to his former defense minister, Mullah Obaidullah, and fled Kandahar to his native Zabul province in the south. He spent several years in the provincial capital, Qalat, hiding in the private home of his driver, a man named Abdul Samad Ustaz, the report says, citing Mr. Omari, his bodyguard, and former Afghan officials.

U.S. special-operations forces searched the house once, according to Mr. Omari, the report says, but didn’t enter the concealed room where Mullah Omar lived until 2004. The Pentagon declined a request for comment.

Borhan Osman, a senior analyst with the International Crisis Group, which studies conflict, said Mullah Omar was deeply suspicious of Pakistan’s intentions because other senior Taliban figures had been placed under house arrest. Mr. Osman, who has studied the Taliban, said his research also indicated that Mullah Omar had remained in Zabul province.

“It looks consistent across the various sources,” Mr. Osman said. Mullah Omar, he added, thought Pakistani leaders “would play him or use his presence to divert the direction of the movement.”

After the U.S. military established a permanent base only a few minutes’ walk from his safe house in Afghanistan, Mullah Omar relocated to a more remote district called Siuray, where his family came from. Mr. Omari, his bodyguard, found him a mud-brick family home and looked after him there until his death in 2013, the Zomia report says.

The second safe house was only a few miles away from a smaller U.S. base, known as Forward Operating Base Wolverine, according to Mr. Omari in the report. FOB Wolverine was south of Qalat, the provincial capital, and many villages in the area were assessed to be Taliban-controlled, a person who served at the base told the Journal. Several U.S. soldiers were killed there while on patrol.

The Zomia Center report said that Afghan intelligence officials repeatedly tried to question Mullah Omar’s driver, but that provincial officials stepped in to protect him.

“They [secret police] went away because I said Abdul Samad Ustaz was innocent,” tribal leader Muhammad Daud Gulzar told Ms. Dam referring to the driver, according to the report. “Later, I heard that Abdul Samad Ustaz protected Mullah Omar. I did not know that.”

The report describes Mullah Omar as living his last years in isolation in Siuray, in the company only of Mr. Omari and a host family, with whom he rarely interacted. Mullah Omar seldom left the dwelling except for brief periods to take in the sunlight and asked only for henna, a dye for his beard, and naswar, a local tobacco.

Mr. Omari told Ms. Dam that Mullah Omar grew ill in 2013, refused to see a doctor or travel to hospitals in Pakistan, and died in Zabul. His family came to bury his body, and a small group of Taliban leaders agreed to keep the death a secret while the U.S. military was preparing to fully withdraw as first planned by the Obama administration.

“Today, for the first time in nearly two decades, the prospect of peace is on the table,” Ms. Dam said in the report. “[If] a negotiated settlement is to succeed, bringing to light such hidden stories of this war will be essential.”
 

Baka's Weird Case

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2015
Messages
16,495
Reputation
7,701
Daps
80,994
Reppin
Goon Squad - Catset
theresa.gif

nap walking in after a two week timeout like nothing happened
 

BoBurnz

Superstar
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
3,499
Reputation
800
Daps
16,171
Soviet-Afghan war lasted 9 years.

We have been in Afghanistan for 17 and counting. So what's your point again?
And we've secured less of the country than the Soviets managed too.

We literally control Kabul and the immediate areas, and that's about it.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,054
Soviet-Afghan war lasted 9 years.

We have been in Afghanistan for 17 and counting. So what's your point again?

The point is we aren't running out with our tail between our legs. There are large gains to be had in the region that 17 years ago was impossible. Taliban has not been decimated but the terrorist groups for the most part have. Pakistan, Indian and Afghanistan will be forced to work together which will stabilize the region .

We should have went into Pakistan with India's help to be honest and just took care of both but for all intent purposes this was no Afghan /Russia and if we leave afghan with a working government then it's a win for us
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,054
And we've secured less of the country than the Soviets managed too.

We literally control Kabul and the immediate areas, and that's about it.


Your last statement is false and you know it.

The first statement is hard to argue because we didn't have the technology or land analysis we do now , Russia left as a loss and we know US and others helped Afghanistan. US at worst is in a stalemate and Taliban seems to be popping out the woodwork more than likely from Pakistan and maybe regular citizens tired of occupied forces....but Taliban also is looking for peace talks with the US directly
 

Hamza B.

Pro
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Messages
482
Reputation
190
Daps
1,945
Reppin
This Dunya...and Beyond
The point is we aren't running out with our tail between our legs. There are large gains to be had in the region that 17 years ago was impossible. Taliban has not been decimated but the terrorist groups for the most part have. Pakistan, Indian and Afghanistan will be forced to work together which will stabilize the region .

We should have went into Pakistan with India's help to be honest and just took care of both but for all intent purposes this was no Afghan /Russia and if we leave afghan with a working government then it's a win for us

:mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol:
John Bolton? Is that you?


Even he wasn't crazy and reckless enough to push for invading Pakistan.
:huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup:

You sound absolutely clueless about foreign policy or how the world works. The invasion of Afghanistan was botched from the beginning. The Taliban were willing to put OBL on trial. The US declined their offer. And instead of going in and taking out OBL/AQ, they instead took on the unnecessary and ridiculous task of toppling the Taliban. Now we've been there for 17 years, and the Taliban is still intact and will be part of the government whenever we leave.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,054
:mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol::mjlol:
John Bolton? Is that you?


Even he wasn't crazy and reckless enough to push for invading Pakistan.
:huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup::huhldup:

You sound absolutely clueless about foreign policy or how the world works. The invasion of Afghanistan was botched from the beginning. The Taliban were willing to put OBL on trial. The US declined their offer. And instead of going in and taking out OBL/AQ, they instead took on the unnecessary and ridiculous task of toppling the Taliban. Now we've been there for 17 years, and the Taliban is still intact and will be part of the government whenever we leave.


LOL@put OBL on trial. What bullshyt are you spouting, we asked for Bin Laden to be handed over and they refused...so We demolished Al Qaeda , whihc you seem to forget about that.

Taliban was never going to be defeated but we gave them a lumping and the main thing is no foreign attacks on US soil and they have basically tried to denounce terrorism . so while you think it's be a lost cause , it isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about and just reading news clips that are hell bent to show how we failed or it's another Vietnam....when in fact Taliban is trying to become legitimate and move on from aligning to terrorism. They are at least saying they are not seeking power but a seat at the table with the current Afghan government - which is the best we can hope for.

The reason i said Pakistan is because that's the real power behind Afghan and with India could have rid ourselves of two issues (although we align with Pakistan for several things, a two-fer of Afghan and Pakistan instead of Iraq would have destroyed the promimence of terror led groups. Not to mention they are the ones funding the over taking of Kashmir
 

Techniec

Drugs and Kalashnikovs
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
9,855
Reputation
1,958
Daps
23,312
Reppin
W/S 416
I don't know what to believe but the story wouldn't surprise me one bit

Man led an infamous military and religious movement whose actions and policies affected the entire world but he was always just a simple Pashtun from the village
 

Hamza B.

Pro
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Messages
482
Reputation
190
Daps
1,945
Reppin
This Dunya...and Beyond
LOL@put OBL on trial. What bullshyt are you spouting, we asked for Bin Laden to be handed over and they refused...so We demolished Al Qaeda , whihc you seem to forget about that.

Taliban was never going to be defeated but we gave them a lumping and the main thing is no foreign attacks on US soil and they have basically tried to denounce terrorism . so while you think it's be a lost cause , it isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about and just reading news clips that are hell bent to show how we failed or it's another Vietnam....when in fact Taliban is trying to become legitimate and move on from aligning to terrorism. They are at least saying they are not seeking power but a seat at the table with the current Afghan government - which is the best we can hope for.

The reason i said Pakistan is because that's the real power behind Afghan and with India could have rid ourselves of two issues (although we align with Pakistan for several things, a two-fer of Afghan and Pakistan instead of Iraq would have destroyed the promimence of terror led groups. Not to mention they are the ones funding the over taking of Kashmir

The Taliban was trying to "become legitimate" in 2001 as well. They did not align themselves with AQ, and denounced AQ's methods and ideology even before 911. And it has become "another Vietnam" in the sense that the US will leave, and the Taliban will again control most of the government, just as the communists controlled Vietnam after we left. It will be another waste...another military adventure that lines the pockets of a few. I know the poppy production in Afghanistan went off the charts after the invasion. Funny how the post-invasion poppy boom coincides with the heroin epidemic in the US. What a crazy coincidence.:jbhmm:

I don't just "read news clips". Far from it. I am more versed and well read in this subject then you. You sound like Bill Kristol and Max Boot on speed. Neoconservatism is dead. Going to war with every country that doesn't fit your geopolitical aims is destructive and psychotic. The world is not a game of Risk. Real human beings are involved here, not plastic pawns.

And an invasion of Pakistan would be utterly disastrous. Even the most bloodthirsty neocon would not want to open that can of worms. You use Kashmir as an example??? Don't even get me started on the atrocities committed by the Indian government in Kashmir.:wow:


These imperial wars that you support and cheer on are designed to rob the indigenous people of their resources and land...plain and simple. The fact that you are cheering on more pointless bloodshed, shows that you are an unhinged lunatic and not a reasonable sane person. I don't debate online with unhinged lunatics. You are now on ignore. :camby:May God guide you. Peace.
 

Perfectson

Banned
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
9,613
Reputation
-1,846
Daps
12,054
The Taliban was trying to "become legitimate" in 2001 as well. They did not align themselves with AQ, and denounced AQ's methods and ideology even before 911. And it has become "another Vietnam" in the sense that the US will leave, and the Taliban will again control most of the government, just as the communists controlled Vietnam after we left. It will be another waste...another military adventure that lines the pockets of a few. I know the poppy production in Afghanistan went off the charts after the invasion. Funny how the post-invasion poppy boom coincides with the heroin epidemic in the US. What a crazy coincidence.:jbhmm:

I don't just "read news clips". Far from it. I am more versed and well read in this subject then you. You sound like Bill Kristol and Max Boot on speed. Neoconservatism is dead. Going to war with every country that doesn't fit your geopolitical aims is destructive and psychotic. The world is not a game of Risk. Real human beings are involved here, not plastic pawns.

And an invasion of Pakistan would be utterly disastrous. Even the most bloodthirsty neocon would not want to open that can of worms. You use Kashmir as an example??? Don't even get me started on the atrocities committed by the Indian government in Kashmir.:wow:


These imperial wars that you support and cheer on are designed to rob the indigenous people of their resources and land...plain and simple. The fact that you are cheering on more pointless bloodshed, shows that you are an unhinged lunatic and not a reasonable sane person. I don't debate online with unhinged lunatics. You are now on ignore. :camby:May God guide you. Peace.


You have to love people who answer with long extended bullshyt , crying and whining, and then at the end say you're on ignore or blocked. How weak minded do to have to be to put someone on ignore because you disagree with them. Like you could legit stop responding or not respond.


For everyone else, it's common knowledge Taliban was aligned and harboring AQ. Taliban has tried to be legit and has reneged against their word several times.

It's obvious this guy is a Taliban apologist, talking about atrocities in Kashmir by India when they chose to be apart of India not Pakistan. If by atrocities you mean fighting with the people to ensure they are able to freely choose then we have a different definition of atrocities .

Taliban will be part of the government but they will not be allowed to undo what the majority ready has built, which is freedoms for women, religions, and modernization. If having a seat at the table while denouncing and stopping terrorism is what you call US losing then happy to take that loss .

Vietnam we obviously tool the L .two different things we ran outta there because it wasn't a winnable war without killing everyone in the north which obviously we had the capacity to do. But after killing over a million Vietnam soldiers and losing 60k , yet seeing waves of more Vietnamese soilders it became pointless
 
Top