conservatives always need a moral-panic bogeyman to stimulate their base. they don't have actual policies so they have to stoke their base with outrage.
The latest statistics indicate that 0.6% of the US population identifies as transgender.[
- Thread starter Malcolmxxx_23
- Start date
conservatives always need a moral-panic bogeyman to stimulate their base. they don't have actual policies so they have to stoke their base with outrage.
Brolic
High Value Poster
Definitely more than 6%. There’s usually at least 1 tranny thread a day.make up 6% the threads in this section tho
Definitely more than 6%. There’s usually at least 1 tranny thread a day.
Some brehs here laid up in the bed with She’ ne ne rolling over to make threads were the feign disgust but was just kissing on that nikka in a dress
sayyestothis
Free the guys
They mostly have opposite policies of dems. So they kinda have policies. Lol
Sure...nothing to do with people pressing to change the definition of woman to include biological males and vice versa...
I bet the number of tranny lovers is more than twice that just based on this forum alone
7.2% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTQ, Gallup Poll finds
Nearly 20% of Generation Z, or those ages 19 to 26, identify as something other than heterosexual, the latest Gallup Poll shows.
www.nbcnews.com
post a source next time.
BulletProof
Just a B@stard Living in a Suit
Now you dont have to be so picky.
Sure...nothing to do with people pressing to change the definition of woman to include biological males and vice versa...
lawmakers have nothing to do with defining words in dictionaries.
change the definition of woman to include biological males at DuckDuckGo
DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.
it seems Cambridge Dictionary already amended the definition last year and I never noticed.
They're the ones codifying these defitions into law. County clerks are legally allowing people to retroactively change their sex on birth certificates. A SCOTUS justice couldn't define "woman" when asked. You don't see anything odd about that?lawmakers have nothing to do with defining words in dictionaries.
change the definition of woman to include biological males at DuckDuckGo
DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.duckduckgo.com
it seems Cambridge Dictionary already amended the definition last year and I never noticed.
All this for .6% of the population....
Because these Replubicacs are projecting their sick closeted fantasies of what they think these drag people do with kids. Meanwhile, these same politicians go to church and work with the evil that harms kids
They are a problem for biological women. They are invading their spaces, taking their slots, and actually trying to compete with them in physical altercations. They are also the mule that is being used to socio-engineer changes in our language to make it more unisex while also removing certain designations and actions that were explicitly for females like Mothers to Birthing people, breastfeeding to chestfeeding, female to bleeders.
I care about the future that my female descendants will inherit just as much as I care about my male descendants' future. I consider a lot of the changes being written centered around making males who identify as women feel comfortable at the expense of actual women (females) to be something I will not silently accept. I don't care what the rainbow gang thinks about it, because their deviancies should not be the measure by which we run our society.
I care about the future that my female descendants will inherit just as much as I care about my male descendants' future. I consider a lot of the changes being written centered around making males who identify as women feel comfortable at the expense of actual women (females) to be something I will not silently accept. I don't care what the rainbow gang thinks about it, because their deviancies should not be the measure by which we run our society.
yes, it is odd.
something being odd isn't necessarily what's going to persuade me to object to it. i'm more concerned about harm.
however small the population is, these people still have parents, siblings, friends or children who care about them and may not want to see them treated as second-class citizens. i'm sure when you take that into account the population of people who are concerned with that is much larger.
Exlurkernegro
Judge me by my heart not my hairline
I've seen more ftm transgenders irl.
Please explicitly state what laws are in place that treat them as second class citizens. I.E. what Jim Crow like laws are around that work specifically against Trans people?
yes, it is odd.
something being odd isn't necessarily what's going to persuade me to object to it. i'm more concerned about harm.
however small the population is, these people still have parents, siblings, friends or children who care about them and may not want to see them treated as second-class citizens. i'm sure when you take that into account the population of people who are concerned with that is much larger.