The "let's not take this shyt so seriously" AEW news & fukkery thread

Scottie Drippin

Should Never Mention Me
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,460
Reputation
5,421
Daps
63,738
Reppin
The Traps of Unified Korea
The Lakeland show makes a bit more sense now :pachaha:


WWE is running a NXT PPV 20 mins away from Dynamite four days before.

This is as crazy as the cat and mouse game has gotten with their booking

Given the history of the building (ECW, MLW, ROH) I wonder if AEW was after the War Memorial first. It's definitely way cheaper than the Hard Rock and fits more in with the historic venues they been running this year.

Fun Fact - saw Kevin Steen and El Generico in one of th best live matches I've ever seen in that building for ROH a decade ago, and before that saw dudes like Sabu and Kojima for MLW.

After ECW, MLW and the War Memorial was briefly the hottest independent building in the country until ROH really took off
 
Last edited:

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
76,919
Reputation
10,443
Daps
210,747

In a Interview with the Kairouz Bros, Bryan Danielson details what AEW existing has done for wrestler's salaries​



"AEW existing and being this challenger brand, and being as successful as we've been, has changed the landscape for wrestling and for the wrestlers themselves. Wrestlers are being paid more now than ever from a sports rights perspective. So, for example, in most major sports in the United States the players get anywhere between 40 to 50% of the revenue.
WWE was paying their wrestlers nowhere close to that. Now, keep in mind, they're still not paying anywhere close to that, but they do have to pay more, because if they don't the talent is going to leave and go to AEW. AEW does pay that 40 to 50% of their revenue to their wrestlers. You know, despite making much less money."
 

KFBF

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,147
Reputation
4,340
Daps
38,934
Reppin
Eagle, Colorado
I'd like to see a third party verify that AEW is paying out 40% - 50% of revenue to wrestlers. Might be true might not be they have every incentive to lie or fudge the truth.

We have much more knowledge about the TKO model as all that information became public due to UFC lawsuits. If I recall correctly the UFC numbers were 10-15% or less. Would not surprise me at all if WWE was at like 20% and looking to get down to like 12%. I'm sure they'd argue something stupid that basically amounts to "you're also being paid in exposure" which doesn't mean much if you're tied up into the wrestling equivalent of A 360 deal.

Edit: looked into this really quickly and all reporting I saw claims UFC pay at 20% max. Also seen it as low as 15/16%.
 
Last edited:

Reality Check

Keepin' it 100
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,504
Reputation
2,465
Daps
54,669
I'd like to see a third party verify that AEW is paying out 40% - 50% of revenue to wrestlers. Might be true might not be they have every incentive to lie or fudge the truth.

We have much more knowledge about the TKO model as all that information became public due to UFC lawsuits. If I recall correctly the UFC numbers were 10-15% or less. Would not surprise me at all if WWE was at like 20% and looking to get down to like 12%. I'm sure they'd argue something stupid that basically amounts to "you're also being paid in exposure" which doesn't mean much if you're tied up into the wrestling equivalent of A 360 deal.

If Snowman took AEW public, then the numbers could be verified, but with it being a private company, they don't have to release that info. Do agree that TKO is going to try to ensure UFC and WWE are within that same percentage.
 

KFBF

Superstar
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,147
Reputation
4,340
Daps
38,934
Reppin
Eagle, Colorado
If Snowman took AEW public, then the numbers could be verified, but with it being a private company, they don't have to release that info. Do agree that TKO is going to try to ensure UFC and WWE are within that same percentage.
Yeah, absent them going public, which I don't see happening or a crazy lawsuit we won't know. As such I'm treating "Dragon's" claim with a bit of healthy skepticism.

I know there were rumors or WB buying/owning a percentage of AEW but I don't think that was ever verified and even so I'm sure there is some legal shyt related to ownership percentage and disclosure and all that.
 

mannyrs13

Compound Kingpin
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
41,670
Reputation
15,995
Daps
90,383
Reppin
Focusville, USA
The Lakeland show makes a bit more sense now :pachaha:


WWE is running a NXT PPV 20 mins away from Dynamite four days before.

This is as crazy as the cat and mouse game has gotten with their booking

Given the history of the building (ECW, MLW, ROH) I wonder if AEW was after the War Memorial first. It's definitely way cheaper than the Hard Rock and fits more in with the historic venues they been running this year.

Fun Fact - saw Kevin Steen and El Generico in one of th best live matches I've ever seen in that building for ROH a decade ago, and before that saw dudes like Sabu and Kojima for MLW.

After ECW, MLW and the War Memorial was briefly the hottest independent building in the country until ROH really took off

Isn't the Lakeland Collision the following weekend, after Dynamite? Maybe one day they can get the War Memorial since it's more historic. Awesome that you got to see those events in that building.
 
Top