No ScandalsDon't blame me, I voted for Chafee
No. It is still shown that money is a stronger predictor of who will win. What you're saying is just conjecture. There's also no reason to believe that they will embrace the left this time around when all the leaked emails show they hate them and when Clinton's entire transition team is filled with centrists.im sure they will embrace them this time. and at this point i dont think money is as important as it was years ago. with the way media and social media is, its much easier to get your message out there. the money is just a cherry on top.
bernie got the money for himself because people agreed with his message. the same will go for others who utilize social media properly. he's actually made it incredibly easy for anybody progressive and interested in a political career, just piggyback bernies wave. he did half the work for them already. its up to people to go and actually vote for them.
but im just eating off the conservative party dying, i'll get into squabbling about how liberal somebody is next election when it'll probably be more relevant
The last 3 are Trump's position, and he flirted with the first one earlier on during the primary. There is a lot more overlap between Trump and Sanders than most liberals are willing to admit, because it's a scary proposition for them. There is plenty of shared space for a candidate to pop up, speaking to both Trump and Sanders' constituencies.Why would progressives who want universal healthcare, an end to law-and-order criminal justice, increased taxes for the 1%, increased funding in infrastructure, reverse in citizens united, and reduced militarism unite with Trump
if they werent dying, gay people wouldnt have just got a shyt load of new rights and we wouldnt have a black guy and unliked woman be president back to back. they run everything else cause people stay at home all the time but the conservative nature of the country as a whole is dying. fukk we might have a transexual president nextMisinformed optimist have been saying this since the countries founding.
Republicans control both the governor’s mansion and legislature in 24 states, 70 of the nation’s 99 state legislative chambers, both chambers in 30 states, plus Nebraska’s single chamber, and 31 governor’s mansions.
One party system: What total Republican control of a state really means
And then you nikkas complain when you can't pass laws
money is and will continue to be less relevant in the day and age where you can connect to people so easily and get famous so easily. bernie didnt get famous because of boatloads of money all he needed was "feel the bern" and twitter. that will be the recipe for success for the next progressive that chooses to ride his wave. and since hillary is so horrible it will be even easier for them because she will be an unliked and horrid president, right
is it oochie wally or one mic? 
I haven't been alive for very long, but I don't think I've ever seen someone more set up to be a one-term president than Hillary Clinton.
She has four years to salvage what's left of her reputation and hope that the Republicans implode again in 2020.
No.if they werent dying gay people wouldnt have just got a shyt load of new rights and we wouldnt have a black guy and unliked woman be president back to back. they run everything else cause people stay at home all the time but the conservative nature of the country as a whole is dying. fukk we might have a transexual president next
Bernie Sanders was a unique candidate in a presidential race. State house and senate races or even federal congressional races will not garner that level of attention or enthusiasm. Someone from Boston is not likely to donate 50 dollars to help the liberal state senate candidate from Kansas win. Sanders had the entire nation sending him money like Voltron with much of it coming from places like Seattle. It's like you guys understand people or millennials based on what the media tells you instead of actually talking with them or understanding those dynamics. Less than 25% of people in the US state that they talk about politics online. Moreover, people being connected by social media is true but activating that social media energy into active political energy is another thing. People don't even research the shyt celebrities give them, and they're obsessed with celebs. Imagine politicians.money is and will continue to be less relevant in the day and age where you can connect to people so easily and get famous so easily. bernie didnt get famous because of boatloads of money all he needed was "feel the bern" and twitter. that will be the recipe for success for the next progressive that chooses to ride his wave. and since hillary is so horrible it will be even easier for them because she will be an unliked and horrid president, right
and on the second point, i thought hillary was in debt to bernie, so you are saying she and her colleagues wont embrace the progressive movement?
It doesn't matter if it's feasible or not, what matters is the narrative being pushed. The "unrealistic" argument you just used against Trump is the same one used against a certain candidate during the primaries...who was that again...oh right, Bernie Sanders. Both campaigns attempted to expand the realm of what was conceived of as politically realistic.
