Classics are songs that hold up due to replay value. How is that flawed?
You wouldn't compare "Tipsy" to "Represent" because they're completely different types of songs made in different eras. Tipsy was for the club in 2005 or whenever it came out, Represent was for the streets in 94.
Still Tippin was for the clubs in 2004. yet we don't hear that sh*t. But we hear Tipsy, which was for the clubs.
At the stage, I gotta ask: what makes Still Tippin classic? Because you're just wasting your time mentally gymnasting all the ways to disagree with me. You keep saying "bu bu you're wrong" and I'm yet to hear your explanations for why it's still a song that matters in 2015 on any level.
You're arguing for Still Tippin, yet I bet you barely (if ever) play that song on your own volition
You're trolling as usual, but I'll entertain your b!tch ass cause I got some free time. You claim you were in Houston for 2 weeks (
) and you heard every classic down south club record played there during your visit () except Still Tippin so that made you come to the conclusion that Still Tippin = Not classic. What type of retard logic is that? So let's say I have a friend from London come visit me for 2 weeks and during her stay she didn't hear CREAM played on the streets that whole time or DMX's Up In Here in the clubs the whole time. Does that mean those songs aren't classic?Coli, this n!gga is an obvious clown troll. Why do y'all continue to encourage him?
Still Tippin, besides the fact that it has a dope ass beat and dope rap performances, put a whole region on the National map and catapulted the careers of 3 Gold and Platinum artists of that generation. It's a clear classic.
