The Neo Cons are Back (never really left). . .

[Meta Reign]

My, oh my. . . We're really in for it.

I don't think it's just talk anymore that we are looking at WW3. The question begs though. . . Who is really behind all of this?

I don't want war and I'm sure the average citizen in every one of the nations involved don't either. The average citizen who does just likes feeling important. They like feeling as if they're more sophisticated and educated in geopolitics. They watch wayyyy too much movies, Netflix, TV and just assume this is how the world should be.

In any case that's not what this thread is about. . .

The Neoconservatives are probably as close to a team of super villians the world will get. Anyone remember PNAC? Or the "Clean Break"?

Look those up.

It's so clear at this point that Trump is a fall guy, a useful idiot.

"This is what voting for populism gets you."

"This is what being conservative gets you." . . .

I wonder if it's too late to do my Grenandian citizenship?

Yea I'm just ranting. But let's use this thread to ask. . . Do you dudes think WW3 is seriously on the horizon? I hope not.

 

[mc_brew]

But let's use this thread to ask. . . Do you dudes think WW3 is seriously on the horizon? I hope not.

omg, people really think our dove trump would lead us to ww III.... .... there has never been a more peaceful president than trump...

 

[David_TheMan]

Trump is no different than Hillary with regard to war mongering.
Which should really let people know the MIC and deep state want , no need, war to happen. Too many eyes looking at the US police state domestically for there to be no real wars going down and they need that to keep up appearances before the whole house collapes.

 

[mc_brew]

Trump is no different than Hillary with regard to war mongering.

.... hillary was the biggest warmonger in the history of mankind... i'm glad that demonic war hawk bytch didn't get elected.... trump will bring us world peace ...

 

[FAH1223]

The MAGA crowd is pissed

 

[David_TheMan]

The MAGA crowd is pissed

To think you had folks earlier this week actually trying to say McMasters and Mattis are reasonable people in Trump's administration

 

[FAH1223]

To think you had folks earlier this week actually trying to say McMasters and Mattis are reasonable people in Trump's administration

If what that article is true, Mattis is focused on ISIS and a political settlement. McMaster wants 100k troops to overthrow the regime and have an Iraq part 2.

And this morning, Tillerson said this

 

[David_TheMan]

If what that article is true, Mattis is focused on ISIS and a political settlement. McMaster wants 100k troops to overthrow the regime and have an Iraq part 2.

And this morning, Tillerson said this

Who would have thought the racist xenophobe Banner would have been more of a dove.

 

[Scholar]

If what that article is true, Mattis is focused on ISIS and a political settlement. McMaster wants 100k troops to overthrow the regime and have an Iraq part 2.

And this morning, Tillerson said this

Our country

 

[Sukairain]

No. Who are you going to start the war with? Russia, who got one aircraft carrier? China?

Nobody can invade America, you got the Atlantic on one side and the Pacific on the other. Massive supply line that stretches thousands of miles across water... no general would be mad enough to try it. And no aircraft carriers on top of that. It's just not possible. America rules the seas.

So your only realistic invasion routes are by land, Canada and Mexico. Both nations are much too weak for the job.

If there is another war like that, just like the last 2, it won't be America that starts it. It'll be over some European or maybe some Asian shyt

 

[David_TheMan]

No. Who are you going to start the war with? Russia, who got one aircraft carrier? China?

Nobody can invade America, you got the Atlantic on one side and the Pacific on the other. Massive supply line that stretches thousands of miles across water... no general would be mad enough to try it. And no aircraft carriers on top of that. It's just not possible. America rules the seas.

So your only realistic invasion routes are by land, Canada and Mexico. Both nations are much too weak for the job.

If there is another war like that, just like the last 2, it won't be America that starts it. It'll be over some European or maybe some Asian shyt

No one has to invade america, if they get america in quagmires across the globe the US will internally dissolve much like all empires do when pressed in maintaining empire

 

[Meta Reign]

No. Who are you going to start the war with? Russia, who got one aircraft carrier? China?

Nobody can invade America, you got the Atlantic on one side and the Pacific on the other. Massive supply line that stretches thousands of miles across water... no general would be mad enough to try it. And no aircraft carriers on top of that. It's just not possible. America rules the seas.

So your only realistic invasion routes are by land, Canada and Mexico. Both nations are much too weak for the job.

If there is another war like that, just like the last 2, it won't be America that starts it. It'll be over some European or maybe some Asian shyt

I would think it would be fought in the middle east.

I truly believe the neo cons envision rebuilding the Babylonian Empire.

 

[Sukairain]

No one has to invade america, if they get america in quagmires across the globe the US will internally dissolve much like all empires do when pressed in maintaining empire

That's the only way to do it.

But it's such a low percentage strategy. You're basically hoping you can start so much shyt that America crumbles from within, far away from where all the fighting is actually happening; but your country stays intact. You would need to play a perfect game to do that without destroying yourself too

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

No one has to invade america, if they get america in quagmires across the globe the US will internally dissolve much like all empires do when pressed in maintaining empire

Laughable

 

[David_TheMan]

That's the only way to do it.

But it's such a low percentage strategy. You're basically hoping you can start so much shyt that America crumbles from within, far away from where all the fighting is actually happening; but your country stays intact. You would need to play a perfect game to do that without destroying yourself too

Not a low percentage strategy though, pretty sound, especially compared to invasion.
Its actually what the US did to spend the USSR out of existance.