The New Cold War

Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
620
Reputation
510
Daps
2,090
@Dreamestorical thanks for dropping knowledge on the motherland.:wow:

That's why I said that Nigeria and the rest of African countries need to build up their military, because Europe might be desperate enough for a military invasion.

An outright military invasion of Nigeria or other african nations will never happen in this day and age. This is because of the amount of media backlash the European nations will receive will be monumental. The only things that can be done to undermine africas growth is covert arming of terrorist organisations like boko haram, al shabab e.t.c

So African nations must continue to invest in their military and be on guard.
 

TMNT4000

Superstar
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
6,008
Reputation
2,680
Daps
15,597
Reppin
Miami Gardens/North Miami
An outright military invasion of Nigeria or other african nations will never happen in this day and age. This is because of the amount of media backlash the European nations will receive will be monumental. The only things that can be done to undermine africas growth is covert arming of terrorist organisations like boko haram, al shabab e.t.c

So African nations must continue to invest in their military and be on guard.
Yeah but they might not give a fukk, because if Africa reach it's max on the continent, Europe will never recover from it.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
620
Reputation
510
Daps
2,090
Yeah but they might not give a fukk, because if Africa reach it's max on the continent, Europe will never recover from it.

By the time the Europeans begin to think of ways to justify going to war with African countries it will already be too late for them. I will tell you one thing. Africa's rise is going to be very quick.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
The BRICs Are Morphing Into An Anti-Dollar Alliance


Before the crucial visit to Beijing next week, the governor of the Russian Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina met Vladimir Putin to report on the progress of the upcoming ruble-yuan swap deal with the People's Bank of China and Kremlin used the meeting to let the world know about the technical details of its international anti-dollar alliance.

Nabuillina.jpg


On June 10th, Sergey Glaziev, Putin's economy advisor published an article outlining the need to establish an international alliance of countries willing to get rid of the dollar in international trade and refrain from using dollars in their currency reserves. The ultimate goal would be to break the Washington's money printing machine that is feeding its military-industrial complex and giving the US ample possibilities to spread chaos across the globe, fueling the civil wars in Libya, Iraq, Syria and Ukraine. Glaziev's critics believe that such an alliance would be difficult to establish and that creating a non-dollar-based global financial system would be extremely challenging from a technical point of view. However, in her discussion with Vladimir Putin, the head of the Russian central bank unveiled an elegant technical solution for this problem and left a clear hint regarding the members of the anti-dollar alliance that is being created by the efforts of Moscow and Beijing:

“We've done a lot of work on the ruble-yuan swap deal in order to facilitate trade financing. I have a meeting next week in Beijing”, she said casually and then dropped the bomb: “We are discussing with China and our BRICS parters the establishment of a system of multilateral swaps that will allow to transfer resources to one or another country, if needed. A part of the currency reserves can be directed to [the new system].” (Prime news agency)

It seems that Kremlin chose the all-in-one approach for establishing its anti-dollar alliance. Currency swaps between the BRICS central banks will facilitate trade financing while completely bypassing the dollar. At the same time, the new system will also act as a de facto replacement of the IMF, because it will allow the members of the alliance to direct resources to finance the weaker countries. As an important bonus, derived from this “quasi-IMF” system, the BRICS will use a part (most likely the “dollar part”) of their currency reserves to support it, thus drastically reducing the amount of dollar-based instruments bought by some of the biggest foreign creditors of the US.

Skeptics will surely claim that a BRICS-based anti-dollar alliance will not manage to deprive the dollar of its global reserve currency status. Instead of arguing against this line of thought, it is easier to point out that Washington is doing its best to enlarge the ranks of the enemies of the dollar. Asked by the Russia 24 channel to comment on Nabiullina statements, Sergey Kostin, the president of the state-owned VTB bank and one of the staunchest supporters of anti-dollar policies, offered an interesting perspective on the situation in Europe:

“I think the work on ruble-yuan swap line will finalized in the nearest future and the way for ruble-yuan settlement will be open. Moreover, we are not the only ones with such initiatives. We know about the statements made by Mr. Noyer, chairman of the Bank of France. As a retaliation for what Americans have done to BNP Paribas, he opined that the trade with China must be done in yuan or euro.”

If the current trend continues, soon the dollar will be abandoned by most of the significant global economies and it will be kicked out of the global trade finance. Washington's bullying will make even former American allies choose the anti-dollar alliance instead of the existing dollar-based monetary system. The point of no return for the dollar may be much closer than it is generally thought. In fact, the greenback may have already past its point of no return on its way to irrelevance.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-02/brics-are-morphing-anti-dollar-alliance
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
The Two Events That Turned Putin Against the U.S.
Former ambassador Michael McFaul on what really motivated Russia to invade Ukraine
DAVID A. GRAHAMJUL 2 2014, 5:56 PM ET

Dispatches from the Aspen Ideas Festival. Full coverage.
See more from AtlanticLIVE.

"I don’t think [Putin] was sitting as a kid dreaming about putting back the Russian empire," McFaul said. The lavish Sochi Olympics and the decision to release of imprisoned Russian businessman Mikhail Khodorkovsky were the actions of a nation trying to assimilate into the world; the crisis in Ukraine imperiled Putin's dream of creating an eastern version of the EU.

Another approach suggests that U.S. policy is to blame—either the Americans were far too aggressive, chastising Russia for its failings, driving NATO eastward, and supporting "color revolutions" in Eastern Europe, which drove Putin to paranoia; or else the Americans were too soft, letting Putin get away with his incursion into Georgia and telegraphing that they wouldn't strike back. McFaul rejected that, too, noting the long list of collaborations between the two governments up to February: a nuclear-arms-reduction treaty, distribution networks to Afghanistan, Iran sanctions, the Syrian chemical-weapons deal. Violent protests in 2010 in Kyrgyzstan didn't cause a crisis; Russian opinion polls showed two-thirds approval of the United States as recently as three years ago.

“Something that happened 20 years ago cannot explain what’s happening now if we were cooperating two years ago,” McFaul argued. That is perhaps not a completely convincing argument—as we learned during the Balkan Wars, among other conflicts, historical animosities can appear to have disappeared, only to reappear suddenly and violently—but it does undermine those who blame U.S. policy.

Instead, McFaul sees two crucial events as leading Putin to decide the U.S. was implacably opposed to him and determined to push him out of power, which together produced the current situation. The first was widespread protests against Putin in early 2012, which the Kremlin accused McFaul himself of organizing. “But that was not the end of the story, because Putin is a great compartmentalist," McFaul said. "He'd say, ‘I understand you’re trying to overthrow regimes in Syria and Iran and here,'" but still see ways to work on business deals or the chemical-weapons deal with America.

The second event came during negotiations for a peaceful exit for Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych this winter. The American government was deeply involved in trying to broker a handover; Vice President Biden was on the phone with Yanukovych. Then the Ukrainian leader suddenly fled the country. "Putin thought that yet again the Americans had duped him. That’s when he said, 'I’m done worrying about what they think about me.'" In short, Putin had adopted a structuralist view. Believing that American grand strategy was geared toward undermining him at every turn, he rejected any attempt to reckon with Obama as an agent of policy. But that was an emotional decision—hence McFaul's allegiance to agency.

“We tend to assign a lot of rationale and logic to individuals and states, and my experience in government suggests ... they’re people with emotions, with worldviews, and that different people in that job will behave differently,” McFaul said. "The good news is that this is not part of a grand strategy where first they take Crimea, then eastern Ukraine, then Moldova, and then a piece of Estonia. This was a response to the collapse of the government in Kiev."

Yet even if the spark wasn't a grand strategy, the ground has now shifted. "The bad news is I think Putin is now locked into his worldview," McFaul said. "It’s going to be a long, long confrontational struggle with Russia that will last at least until Putin is no longer the leader."

http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...faul-what-turned-putin-against-the-us/373866/
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
Argentina looks to China and Russia for support
By Benedict Mander in Buenos Aires©Reuters
Argentina's president, Cristina Fernández

After Argentina’s defeat in the US courts in its decade-long dispute with hedge funds, President Cristina Fernández will turn to the leaders of China and Russia for support when they visit Buenos Aires this month.

Argentina hopes for more than just political backing for its battle against so-called holdouts when Russia’s Vladimir Putin arrives on Saturday before a Brics summit of emerging market economies – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – in Brazil next week, with China’s Xi Jinping following a week later.

Analysts say the gigantic Vaca Muerta shale formation in remote Patagonia is the motive behind both Chinese and Russian interest in Argentina, while Buenos Aires desperately needs foreign investment to develop what are the world’s second biggest shale gas reserves and fourth largest shale oil reserves.

Argentina has been locked out of the capital markets since defaulting on almost $100bn of debt in 2001 but relations with international investors are gradually returning to normal, with the government resolving a series of disputes in recent months.

3afe080e-0863-11e4-9afc-00144feab7de.img

“The fact that both Putin and Xi are sitting down with an Argentina that repays its debts is very different from doing so with an Argentina in default,” said Carlos Germano, a political analyst. “If the latter were the case I don’t know whether they would come to Buenos Aires.”

Most recently, Argentina has begun negotiating with holdout creditors who refused to accept debt restructurings after the default, with the US Supreme Court last month rejecting the country’s appeal to review a lower-court ruling that it must pay them in full.

Still, officials privately express disappointment that Bridas Corporation, one of the top energy companies in Argentina in which a 50 per cent stake was acquired by the China National Offshore Oil Corporation in 2010, has still not made any commitments to invest in Vaca Muerta.

Eduardo Levy Yeyati, an economist from the Elypsis consultancy in Buenos Aires, doubts that there will be new investment announcements during the presidential visits, dismissing reports that Gazprom may be interested in investing in Vaca Muerta as rumours.

Chinese companies are already due to firm up major investments in hydroelectric projects in Patagonia and a railway linking Argentina with Chile’s Pacific coast that could strengthen China’s status as Argentina’s top trade partner – not only the main destination for its abundant grain exports, especially soya but also a major source of imports of electrical goods.

More
ON THIS STORY
ON THIS TOPIC
IN AMERICAS POLITICS & POLICY
Mr Yeyati said plans were being revived for a $10bn currency swap with China. It would enable the Asian giant to receive renminbi for its exports to Argentina, taking pressure off shortages of dollars in Buenos Aires as it remains unable to borrow abroad until the holdouts issue is resolved.

Although not a reserve currency, the increasing use of renminbi in trade finance could help contribute to China’s growing financial clout as the Brics countries prepare to launch a development bank in Brazil on July 15 that will challenge US dominance of multilateral lending institutions.

The visit of both Mr Xi and Mr Putin to Buenos Aires marks a major step forward for Argentina, after being branded a pariah when it defaulted in 2001.

“It’s a moment of great importance in Argentina’s international reinsertion after over a decade of isolation when no leaders of importance came to Argentina,” said Jorge Castro, a specialist in international relations. “But they are beginning to arrive again.”

Mr Castro said the government has been greatly strengthened since a policy U-turn after its poor performance in midterm elections in October. He pointed to a devaluation in January that stemmed a rapid decline in foreign exchange reserves, and agreements both to compensate Spain’sRepsol after the expropriation of its Argentine assets in 2012, and to repay a longstanding $10bn debt with the Paris Club of creditor nations.

Now, after years of the government staunchly refusing to negotiate with the holdouts, economy minister Axel Kicillof is due to return to New York on Friday to continue negotiations over payment in an attempt to avoid a second default in 13 years at the end of this month.

“Last year the government was in freefall but that situation

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/7d88...44feab7de.html?siteedition=intl#axzz376IEVxIN

The West fukking over and alienating more nations and pushing them East :sas1:
 

ltheghost

Payin Debts.... N40
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
6,508
Reputation
480
Daps
7,449
Reppin
Japan, but from the 989
Resources will be fought over. Mainly oil and water. China and Russia will form an alliance in the next three years and start destabilizing the dollar world wide. But then Russia will start experiencing several upticks in terrorist activity. The main problem Russia has it that it has too many "capitalist" who are easily bought in their system. China is the real problem because of their numbers and other assets. There was just a story about how Chinese hackers got inside the State Labor Department systems and were copying information. The way you handle China is let natural selection thin them out. They are having a shortage of women due to their old one child only policy. Then find a way to introduce more capitalism into their system, (The Make US look good strategy) "Why get rid of USA when they bring us so much pleasure".

Israel is either going to have to start a war in the Middle East for survival or chill out on the bombing of Hamas every year. When the Caliphate is formed they are going to be looking at Israel like... :ufdup:. They probably need to start building a wall and start fortifying with new weapons tech now.

But all this will probably never happen because in 2018 technology will jump significantly due to the introduction of the "Machine". A new age in my opinion. Google, "The Machine" to see what I'm talking about.

(Look at Nigeria! WOW! :salute:
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,780
Reputation
4,736
Daps
104,068
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Resources will be fought over. Mainly oil and water. China and Russia will form an alliance in the next three years and start destabilizing the dollar world wide. But then Russia will start experiencing several upticks in terrorist activity. The main problem Russia has it that it has too many "capitalist" who are easily bought in their system. China is the real problem because of their numbers and other assets. There was just a story about how Chinese hackers got inside the State Labor Department systems and were copying information. The way you handle China is let natural selection thin them out. They are having a shortage of women due to their old one child only policy. Then find a way to introduce more capitalism into their system, (The Make US look good strategy) "Why get rid of USA when they bring us so much pleasure".

Israel is either going to have to start a war in the Middle East for survival or chill out on the bombing of Hamas every year. When the Caliphate is formed they are going to be looking at Israel like... :ufdup:. They probably need to start building a wall and start fortifying with new weapons tech now.

But all this will probably never happen because in 2018 technology will jump significantly due to the introduction of the "Machine". A new age in my opinion. Google, "The Machine" to see what I'm talking about.

(Look at Nigeria! WOW! :salute:

Good points. I would like to point out China rise to the top will be smooth and quick in my opinion. There is no beneficial in being a ally to the U.S anymore. Australia leadership is already asking to cut strong ties to a minimal, Africa not messing with America and Germany don't trust them add the entire continent of S.A

This past decade prove to be the weakest and self destruction of foreign policy probably since god knows when in our lifetime. China shows that theyaren't forcing wars down people throats, they just want money and resources and they will pay fair for them. Africa must use this to their advantage this 21st century.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
46,780
Reputation
4,736
Daps
104,068
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
I would like to add I don't see what China is doing regarding the disputed Seas and Islands as wrong. People forget how Japan raped the Shyt out of the Pacific especially China. China been giving the wrong hand compare to Africa minus the slave trade.
 

Spidey Man

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
11,491
Reputation
1,586
Daps
33,970
Reppin
NULL
Chinese man charged with hacking into U.S. computer systems of companies with large defense contracts

SAN DIEGO — U.S. authorities have charged a Chinese businessman with hacking into the computer systems of U.S. companies with large defense contracts, including Boeing, to steal data on military projects, including some of the latest fighter jets, officials said Friday.

Suspect Su Bin worked in cahoots with two unnamed Chinese hackers to get the data between 2009 and 2013, and Su attempted to sell some of the information to state-owned Chinese companies, according to a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles that was unsealed Thursday.

The men targeted fighter jets such as the F-22 and the F-35 as well as Boeing’s C-17 military cargo aircraft program, according to court papers.

An attorney for Su could not be reached for comment. Su was arrested in Canada on June 28 and remains in custody there, said FBI spokeswoman Laura Eimiller in Los Angeles. He has a bail hearing set for July 18.

U.S. Department of Justice spokesman Marc Raimondi said the conspirators are alleged to have accessed the computer networks of U.S. defense contractors without authorization and stolen data related to military aircraft and weapons systems.

“We remain deeply concerned about cyber-enabled theft of sensitive information, and we have repeatedly made it clear that the United States will continue using all the tools our government possesses to strengthen cyber security and confront cybercrime,” Raimondi said.

Boeing said in a statement that the company cooperated with investigators and will continue to do so to hold accountable “individuals who perpetrate economic espionage or trade secret theft against U.S. companies.”

“We appreciate that the government brought its concerns about a potential compromise of our protected computer systems to our attention,” the company said in a statement.

Accusations of hacking by China and counterclaims of such activity by the U.S. government have strained U.S.-Chinese relations. Chinese hacking has been a major theme of U.S.-China discussions this week in Beijing, though both sides have publicly steered clear of the controversy.

The New York Times reported Wednesday that Chinese hackers broke into the computer networks of the Office of Personnel Management earlier this year with the intention of accessing the files of tens of thousands of federal employees who had applied for top-secret security clearances. Senior U.S. officials say the hackers gained access to some of the agency’s databases in March before the threat was detected and blocked.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Thursday that both the federal personnel office and the Department of Homeland Security took steps to mitigate any risk as soon as they learned about the possible intrusion.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...acking-u-s-computer-systems-article-1.1864114
 
Top