It adds to my response about the "soil" western women are raised in. While some great flowers can bloom unaffected for the most part but the majority will be weeds and on the same time as the author of that hit piece.What on earth does that have to do with the quote in op?
I BEEN realized this..they lowkey love the stereotypical nikka as they can put you in a box so they feel comfortableDespite acting high minded supposed sophisticated white folks love when you fill a stereotype and kinda hate when you don't.
Still Sydney Sweeney isn't as attractive as the zeitgeist pretends.
It adds to my response about the "soil" western women are raised in. While some great flowers can bloom unaffected for the most part but the majority will be weeds and on the same time as the author of that hit piece.
So, looking to make difference between a tether women and Ados women is pointless in my eyes. The same if you look to make a difference between white women and asian women and so on.
But they're literally all different.But they're literally all different.
I think these distinctions are necessary as we navigate a world with so many ethnicities and races in close proximity. Like, 'Tiger Moms' is an apt description, why not use it? Or like son who made a thread recently specifically about Indian immigrants and how funny they move, putting us up on game.
I post them for myself
I get so tired of seeing plastic hoes on here I counteract with 100% Organic
If it was for Coli dudes u would be able to dm me right now

Eh. Of course there's certain nuances and differences but if you know what's the foundation is for all these women. They're the same until proven otherwise or if lord is willing the man would be able to mold them to not be the same.
All of this just makes thing more clear and less complicated for me.
Humans categorize, that's kinda what we do.People dapping Goop Scoop will never not be funny"Blavity blacks" have done so much damage to normal black political and social discourse I fear we may not recover. They provide endless fodder for republican attacks.




I do not disagree@Gloxina Great example of usage in the wild.![]()

I don't know how she would phrase it because I don't know her or her writings.Thats the thing, they wont learn
Pretend to not know subtext breh
Saying "i dont care about her backstory" is why you keep missing the point. Of course that statement in a vacuum isn't bad. But with the context, it is.
Also, this:
@MischievousMonkey , do you really think she'd phrase it that if she were talking about groups like above? You're saying shes talking about stereotypes, but you think would she phrase it like that talking about other groups of men?
Hell no she wouldn't. Because those groups would shyt on her.
But here you are defending the musings and intent of a woman that has already been exposed as a neurotic writer suffering from cognitive dissonance![]()
Judging from her pictures, she's sorely lacking in that regards.I don't give a fukk about what her backstory
