The NIH/PubMed study thread

semtex

:)
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,310
Reputation
3,429
Daps
46,205
Muscular adaptations in response to three... [Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002] - PubMed - NCBI


Postin this because I see so many rep ranges thrown around for hypertrophy.



Highly readable summary below.

n=sample size.

Subjects were divided into four groups:
1) a low repetition group (Low Rep, n = 9) performing 3-5 repetitions maximum (RM) for four sets of each exercise with 3 min rest between sets and exercise.

2) an intermediate repetition group (Int Rep, n = 11) performing 9-11 RM for three sets with 2 min rest

3) high repetition group (High Rep, n = 7) performing 20-28 RM for two sets with 1 min rest

4) non-exercising control group (Con, n = 5).


No significant changes in fiber-type composition were found in the control samples. Although all three training regimens resulted in similar fiber-type transformations (IIB to IIA), the low to intermediate repetition resistance-training programs induced a greater hypertrophic effect compared to the high repetition regimen. The High Rep group, however, appeared better adapted for submaximal, prolonged contractions, with significant increases after training in aerobic power and time to exhaustion. Thus, low and intermediate RM training appears to induce similar muscular adaptations.
 

semtex

:)
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,310
Reputation
3,429
Daps
46,205
So which is better?
Not exercising at all. :ehh:
genius-meme.jpg
 

.༼-◕_◕-༽.

.༼-◕_◕-༽.
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
5,480
Reputation
1,300
Daps
13,472
Reppin
Dona Nobis Pacem
Muscular adaptations in response to three... [Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002] - PubMed - NCBI


Postin this because I see so many rep ranges thrown around for hypertrophy.



Highly readable summary below.

n=sample size.

Subjects were divided into four groups:
1) a low repetition group (Low Rep, n = 9) performing 3-5 repetitions maximum (RM) for four sets of each exercise with 3 min rest between sets and exercise.

2) an intermediate repetition group (Int Rep, n = 11) performing 9-11 RM for three sets with 2 min rest

3) high repetition group (High Rep, n = 7) performing 20-28 RM for two sets with 1 min rest

4) non-exercising control group (Con, n = 5).


No significant changes in fiber-type composition were found in the control samples. Although all three training regimens resulted in similar fiber-type transformations (IIB to IIA), the low to intermediate repetition resistance-training programs induced a greater hypertrophic effect compared to the high repetition regimen. The High Rep group, however, appeared better adapted for submaximal, prolonged contractions, with significant increases after training in aerobic power and time to exhaustion. Thus, low and intermediate RM training appears to induce similar muscular adaptations.
I'm copping this
 
Top