The OFFICIAL 2015 College Football RANDOM thoughts thread

[Brady-Carter]

Huskies look bad.

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

@Swagnificent all tht makes sense in theory but at the end of the day the games have to be played, coaches have to make game plan and players have to live up to their potiential. Some predictions are not gon happen

 

[SubZeroDegrees]

Never hire Boise State coaches brehs.

 

[HearNoEvil]

Huskies look bad.

this fukking bullshyt I'm looking at on my TV breh thankfully Seattle got Seahawks football...

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

we got a game now

 

[HearNoEvil]

ok!

 

[Brady-Carter]

this fukking bullshyt I'm looking at on my TV breh thankfully Seattle got Seahawks football...

Back in it now.

 

[Rigby.]

All recruiting years are not created equal. My projections place significant importance on the 2013 and 2014 cycles. Why you might ask? Because most of the premier talent in college football any given season is almost always concentrated in the junior and sophomore classes. The top players from the 2012 senior class are already in the nfl (see Jameis Winston, Amari Cooper, Leonard Williams), thus using the 2012 or 2011 recruiting rankings make no sense. In addition, placing significant importance on 2015 also doesn't make much sense since freshmen as a whole don't make much of an impact. Only a few special ones in each class make significant impact.

Alabama, Ohio State, and LSU are the only schools with top 6 recruiting classes in 2013 and 2014, which is why I have them a level ahead of everyone else. A&M is very much in the same class as Auburn (both had top 10-15 classes in 2013 and 2014), however I like A&M's schedule a little more than Auburn which is why I like A&M a little more.

Auburn 2013-2014 class is going to doing more or has done more in certain cases

 

[HearNoEvil]

bro...we were in fukking field goal range

then got a dumbass holding penalty

then took a sack

fukk this shyt

 

[Brady-Carter]

Just missed.

 

[Silkk]

Them huskies looking

 

[HearNoEvil]

I'm tired of this Peterson led squad starting the game flat and turning up only when it's too late

if we played the 1st and 2nd quarters like we played the 4th, we would have won

is going on Chris Peterson???

 

[Absolut]

But is it bigger for gambling? @Absolut

im not sure what he was referring to. but games like tuesday night mac-tion on espn couldnt draw flies without gambling interest. the ncaa will decry the espn cover alerts (i personally couldnt believe what i was watching when i saw that first cover alert) but it will only boost interest. i was at a friends house who works at gorman, and had a bunch of people over to watch the gorman football game which was on one of his tvs, and the other tv we were cycling thru the college games. that cover alert generated more talk, and eventual interest in some garbage ass smu/baylor and michigan state/directional michigan games than anything else would have. whole room of casuals was watching those games unfold and talking point spreads like they were degens. then i brought up the gorman point spread and all hell broke loose. its frankly downright comical that espn is doing in game breaks for point spread alerts, and draftkings is in every commercial break, yet the ncaa is in lawsuits to ban sports betting from becoming widespread. that cover alert will only help it become legal, which is what i cant wait to see

 

[WaddupDoe!]

Its week 1 man, where would you put them?

not fukking 4. i need to take a look at the rankings. But they arent the 4th best team to start the season.

 

[Silkk]

not fukking 4. i need to take a look at the rankings. But they arent the 4th best team to start the season.

How could you possibly know that?