blankstairz
Superstar
Well, Franks does suck.

Does Mullen have his next Fitzgerald/Dak/Tebow signed yet for next year?

The same Syracuse that actually lost to Pitt and needed OT to beat 1-7 UNC?
CanesInsight been on FIRE for weeks nowI hate to say it, but in a weird way it's better from a fukkery standpoint when your team loses because all fukkery and hot takes break lose.

I hate to say it, but in a weird way it's better from a fukkery standpoint when your team loses because all fukkery and hot takes break lose.

I can't see the committee leaving Bama out if their only loss is in the SECCG. Just based off of how they've played this season I don't see how you could make a reasonable argument that Bama should be excluded other than "they lost once"

I mean.. look at the losses between Michigan and Bama. Michigan lost in its first game of the year to the The #2 or #3 ranked team by a TD. But they're the big ten champs after going unscathed the rest of the way. Bama would have an identical 12-1 record, but without a conference championship. And they would have lost on the last week of the season.
I'm not saying that this WILL happen.. it just seems likely. At the end of the day, everything will be ok if we all say fukk You to Notre Dame and have them sit it out. Either man up and join a conference, or you'll always be the odd one left out.![]()
should be playing Emory Jones more especially if what that tweeter is saying is true. seems like felipe dgaf and that'll turn the whole team if they keep trottin his garbage ass out thereWell, Franks does suck.
Does Mullen have his next Fitzgerald/Dak/Tebow signed yet for next year?
Breh I get that you're a Michigan fan but let's be reality. There's no scenario where that seems likely. Just last year Bama made the Playoff as a 1 loss at large team and the Big 10 champ has been shut out of the Playoff 2 out of 4 years. The Committee has shown you what they think of Alabama and i see it as extremely unlikely that a 1 loss Michigan team makes it in over a 1 loss Bama team. If it comes down to that scenario y'all are on the outside looking in, not Bama
Yeah I know. That's the point of the post. I had this whole thread saying that expression last yearHe’s not dead fam
Well, Franks does suck.
Does Mullen have his next Fitzgerald/Dak/Tebow signed yet for next year?

Last week Florida players told us that they were better than UGA despite getting dominated and losing the game. Was Florida still the better team this week losing to unranked Mizzou at home by 3 TDs? Was it just a lack of execution?![]()

Only way they could do it is if the 1st round of the playoffs wouldn't rematch Bama & UGA. If it would then it makes no fukking sense.Breh I get that you're a Michigan fan but let's be reality. There's no scenario where that seems likely. Just last year Bama made the Playoff as a 1 loss at large team and the Big 10 champ has been shut out of the Playoff 2 out of 4 years. The Committee has shown you what they think of Alabama and i see it as extremely unlikely that a 1 loss Michigan team makes it in over a 1 loss Bama team. If it comes down to that scenario y'all are on the outside looking in, not Bama
ND would be the one in peril.....This has nothing to do with me being a Michigan fan. They will NOT put TWO SEC teams in the playoff again, unless the winner of the B1G (or another big conference) has more than one loss. Thats the gripe with the committee in the past, and its what they're trying to avoid moving forward. So if Michigan runs the table and wins the Big Ten championship with only one loss, then they're in. Believe that. And if Georgia beats Bama in the SEC championship game (which they won't) .. they'll be in and Bama won't. I know thats hard to believe.. but I'm telling you they'd leave Bama out in that situation.