The OFFICIAL 2019 College football RANDOM THOUGHTS thread

[TUA TAGOVAILOA]

So teams wanting to be #1 means you scared to play Clemson . You #5 so u must be scared as shyt

Only reason to care is because of who you’ll have to play

 

[Trust Me]

We trash but we’ve at least won our conference and multiple rose bowls since 2003

Taking the Pac is like winning a gold medal in the special olympics breh. Let’s slow down a bit.

 

[Trav]

We trash but we’ve at least won our conference and multiple rose bowls since 2003

 

[smitty22]

Only reason to care is because of who you’ll have to play

Wouldn’t we have to play them anyways smart guy?

 

[Silkk]

Taking the Pac is like winning a gold medal in the special olympics breh. Let’s slow down a bit.

Sound like you mad USC got more Big Ten chips than Michigan the past two decades

 

[Silkk]

Be forgetting about that damn show

 

[invincible1914]

So teams wanting to be #1 means you scared to play Clemson . You #5 so u must be scared as shyt

Nobody wants no part of Clemson in that first round. But Tua-less Bama or Pac 12 Utah

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

Told you we’d be back at number 1 @O.iatlhawksfan

If y’all so scared of Clemson than we’ll beat them

 

[MustafaSTL]

If y’all so scared of Clemson than we’ll beat them

Nobody mentioned Clemson. Just say you were wrong and move it along.

 

[Trust Me]

Sound like you mad USC got more Big Ten chips than Michigan the past two decades

Damn, I thought WE lived in the past

 

[O.iatlhawksfan]

Nobody mentioned Clemson. Just say you were wrong and move it along.

Then what y’all want #1 so bad for at the end of the day you have to play for it so all the back and forth isnt relevant. If you want me to say I was wrong then cool I was wrong, but what the committee thinks means nothing if you can play for it and settle it on the field.


If we have to play Clemson then so be it sounds like a great opportunity to play another good opponent.

 

[Silkk]

Damn, I thought WE lived in the past

2003 2017

 

[smitty22]

Then what y’all want #1 so bad for at the end of the day you have to play for it so all the back and forth isnt relevant. If you want me to say I was wrong then cool I was wrong, but what the committee thinks means nothing if you can play for it and settle it on the field.


If we have to play Clemson then so be it sounds like a great opportunity to play another good opponent.

Yall the only ones bringing up Clemson . They on yalls mind not ours.

 

[RammerJammer]

Y'all out here arguing between #1 and #2, I just wanna be #4

But really it doesn't matter between #1 and #2, I don't get the whole "it's important x team to be #1 to avoid Clemson" bullshyt because if the #1 team might have to play Clemson anyway.

 

[MustafaSTL]

Then what y’all want #1 so bad for at the end of the day you have to play for it so all the back and forth isnt relevant. If you want me to say I was wrong then cool I was wrong, but what the committee thinks means nothing if you can play for it and settle it on the field.


If we have to play Clemson then so be it sounds like a great opportunity to play another good opponent.

nikka. I mentioned we’d be number one at the end of the season and you had a conniption and went on a string of posts about Indiana and SEC rah rah rah talk about why y’all should be number one. Now you’re juelzing about shyt instead of saying you were wrong the whole time about LSU finishing number one like you kept alluding to. Not that hard to say “I was wrong.”