I said you gay. Not playing dumb at allDont play dumb now Smittydust
The Official 2025 College Football Random Thoughts Thread
- Thread starter Silkk
- Start date
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Didn’t say i had a problem. Just said u gay.You got a problem with the LGBTQ community?
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Naw im a tell you to rewatch the playoffsAnd next you gonna be telling me go back to my country
I don’t want no problems
DropTopDoc
Smokin my Opps like Patrick Mahomes pops
Good fr Jesus man, that’s more than can be said for you heathen
Man androgynous af like a 80’s rock group
Dont play dumb now Smittydust
I assure you thanks to Columbus school system he ain’t playing
Bigwhite2498
Superstar
You know where Shawn from rightTrue true
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
Whips-n-Chains
Chi
Silkk
Can't Change My Damn Avi :beli:
TF is HBO doing
Whips-n-Chains
Chi
Wondering what "changes in the financial distribution model" will look like. And uneven split amongst schools?
Edit:
“This new revenue-distribution model — or ‘brand initiative’ — is based on a five-year rolling average of TV ratings, though some logistics of this formula remain tricky, including how to properly average games on the unrated ACC Network or other subscription channels,” according to ESPN. “The brand initiative will be funded through a split in the league’s TV revenue, with 40% distributed evenly among the 14 longstanding members and 60% going toward the brand initiative and distributed based on TV ratings.”
The Wake Forests, Syracuses, Dukes, etc. are going to get FUUUUCKED hard out of this.
“Top earners are expected to net an additional $15 million or more, according to sources, while some schools will see a net deduction in annual payout of up to about $7 million annually, an acceptable loss, according to several administrators at schools likely to be impacted, in exchange for some near-term stability.”
SMU makes the playoffs but 2-win FSU makes more b/c of viewership in the last 5 years
SMU to the Big 12 makes so much more sense.
Last edited:
DropTopDoc
Smokin my Opps like Patrick Mahomes pops
Wondering what "changes in the financial distribution model" will look like. And uneven split amongst schools?
Edit:
“This new revenue-distribution model — or ‘brand initiative’ — is based on a five-year rolling average of TV ratings, though some logistics of this formula remain tricky, including how to properly average games on the unrated ACC Network or other subscription channels,” according to ESPN. “The brand initiative will be funded through a split in the league’s TV revenue, with 40% distributed evenly among the 14 longstanding members and 60% going toward the brand initiative and distributed based on TV ratings.”
The Wake Forests, Syracuses, Dukes, etc. are going to get FUUUUCKED hard out of this.
“Top earners are expected to net an additional $15 million or more, according to sources, while some schools will see a net deduction in annual payout of up to about $7 million annually, an acceptable loss, according to several administrators at schools likely to be impacted, in exchange for some near-term stability.”
SMU makes the playoffs but 2-win FSU makes more b/c of viewership in the last 5 years
nikkas polishing silverware on the titanic, all this does is extend the death date on the acc, cuz please believe the big 3 of the acc are trying to secure landing spots in back door deals
Whips-n-Chains
Chi
Where do they land? I still stand by my SEC x B1G D1+ conference which will likely want those 3 in there, but this might not happen for another 10+ years.
SEC perspective:
- UF will not allow FSU & UM in the conference
- S.Car will not allow Clemson
(How did this work with adding Texas b/c I'm sure A&M tried their hardest to block it)
B1G perspective:
- really has no interest in FSU, they don't fit the academic standards
- Clemson doesn't
- Miami does (AAU membership), and would bring some Florida TV markets, but FSU brings more TV viewership, and I doubt the B1G adds 1 school for an uneven amount.
Big 12 seems to make the most sense.