Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

Black_Jesus

Black_Jesus

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
16,688
Reputation
878
Daps
22,303
Reppin
from the home of coca-cola, i'm not referring to s
chunky_mcdaniels said:
That's right, what's lost on 90% of the public re sanctioning bodies, is they provide boxers with 'options'.

When there's minimal belts, there's minimal choice to pivot, negotiate or take control of your own/teams career.

Ultimately, having just a Ring Magazine belt / Zuffa belt means they 'completely control the narrative' of who fights, for what price, when and where. aka The UFC. This is entirely by design.

Oh you don't like that fight? You don't like the 50k flat rate? Too bad, there's no other options, we run this as a company now, take the fight or leave it.

Only stupid motherfukkers can't see this.
Click to expand...
If it comes with better fights more often then im for it.. When there was all these options and freedom boxing did nothing but continue to decline
 
chunky_mcdaniels

chunky_mcdaniels

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
5,185
Reputation
449
Daps
8,229
((ReFleXioN)) EteRNaL said:
Uh yea. Exactly. Wtf are you talking about?:heh:.....the ring is doing a better job promoting the sport than any of these scumbag "promoters" ever did. That's the entire fukkin point:mjlol:
Click to expand...
No, as in it's a promotional arm for Ring, Zuffa, which is effectively Saudi Arabia, that's not journalism, which was your original point.

If you can't discern the difference between valuable, independent journalism and thinly disguised agitprop, then you belong where you are, a pawn treading water in the shallows.

You seriously expect us to believe that Max Kellerman is doing a better job than Ring Magazine prior to Alishikh's purchase?

Let me guess, you preferred Word Up magazine to The Source in 1996?:mjlol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top