Essential The Official Boxing Random Thoughts Thread...All boxing heads ENTER.

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
*random*


@reservoirdogs Willie Nelson on FB arguing your point about compubox (somebody tried to use the compubox numbers as and why he sees GGG as the winner





Troy K Fox
I put up a video a day or two ago explaining what I saw. Today I posted the punch stats that supported my theory. Great fight for Jacobs and GGG, but in the end the judges picked GGG.

http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-vs-jacobs-compubox...

Golovkin vs. Jacobs - CompuBox Punch Stats - Boxing News

Willie Trae Nelson
I must've miss the jabs I really didn't see ggg landing that much

Willie Trae Nelson


Compubox numbers can be rigged altered and change just like the judges score cards I'm about to look at the fight gain count total jabs and punches thrown ggg wasn't having that much success with the jab it was rounds where dj was boxing jabbing and moving he literally out jabbed him and on every card they have dj throwing less jabs and landing less jabs let's be serious stop letting the media control what you see because they say it's so doesn't means it's so. Me looking at that fight and looking at the compubox stats they a damn lie. I'm just saying



Most fighters undoubtedly seen Jacobs as the winner.....the judges and media seen GGG as the winner.



I believe at least 1 of the 3 judges should be a former fighter who have actually fought professionally before. It's kind of like how when other sports are on TV, the color commentator is usually 1 person who has actually competed at the highest level as well. Just my opinion and I think it would help the scoring of fights:hubie:
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,905
Reputation
1,050
Daps
26,038
*random*


@reservoirdogs Willie Nelson on FB arguing your point about compubox (somebody tried to use the compubox numbers as and why he sees GGG as the winner










Most fighters undoubtedly seen Jacobs as the winner.....the judges and media seen GGG as the winner.



I believe at least 1 of the 3 judges should be a former fighter who have actually fought professionally before. It's kind of like how when other sports are on TV, the color commentator is usually 1 person who has actually competed at the highest level as well. Just my opinion and I think it would help the scoring of fights:hubie:
Well idk how biased are they from the media but what I said and what he says is not even an argument but a fact. It's a fact that compubox is counted by other people therefor they really are just the opinions of other people. Same applies to HBO and every other punch stats.
Interesting that HBO punch stats I believe had Jacobs landing more.
Golovkin is a very popular fighter among both media and fan circles period. He has his haters yes but overall we can't say that he is rather not liked. If anything he got the benefit of the doubt. He is from the same breed of that "people's champ" image as Pac only not as big.
 

reservoirdogs

Superstar
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
12,905
Reputation
1,050
Daps
26,038
Also we don't even know the name of people who count Compubox
How reliable is that?

Maybe it can be looked up but I'm sure that 95 or more precent of the people who use compubox as some fact, a deciding argument in a debate using it simply cause they see sheer numbers written down and because it's looking official they assume it is (or they assumi it is cause it supports their opinion) and not because they actually know who counted it and they believe in the authority of that person's opinion.

In cases like this I take no person's opinion as authority. I have my respected writers whose opinions I respect and think about, etc... but I won't take any opinion therefor any punch stat as a gospel.

With that said punch stats can be still interesting but people should only look at it as an opinion.
Punches should be counted by machines at this point but even that wouldn't be an authoritive opinion cause in boxing you can't count how big the effor tof a punch was on the other fighter. Sheer number of throwns and connected punches only gives you a short sight.
That's why so many disagreements and controversy in boxing judging. There is NO one standard way to judge it so people will also go by their instincts in cases where fights are closer.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
Tonight:



March 28
At Nice, Calif.: (PBC on Fox Sports 1/Fox Deportes):

  • Leduan Barthelemy vs. Reynaldo Blanco, 10 rounds, junior lightweights

  • Mark Anthony Hernandez vs. Kyrone Davis, 10 rounds, junior middleweights
 
Top