1) I have a utilitarian morality especially when it comes to politics. I think the outcomes of decisions is the most important consideration and not how you “feel” about something. When people say that you should allow people who withheld their vote to be emotional and drag us down with them because of the circumstance, I completely dismiss that.
I understand your utilitarian morality. I'm questioning where you're apportioning the blame for the outcome. You're blaming individual voters for not voting for the candidate, and I'm saying the blame is better placed at the candidate and political leadership who made voting for them such an unappealing, immoral proposition. This country is (allegedly) a liberal democracy, voting isn't mandatory. If Kamala came out in favor of banning abortion or stop-and-frisk, she would lose support as well, but it's hard for me to believe you would be blaming pregnant women and victims of police brutality for not universally supporting her. The candidate's job is to promote good policies and appeal to the public. On the issue of Israel-Palestine, Kamala failed on both counts.
2) liberals tried to stress to those who withheld their vote for Gaza that Trump would be worse for the entire world let alone Gaza. As we can see that is correct. You may not believe it, but it’s my view that Trump/Republicans sabotaged the ceasefire talks with Bibi behind the scenes and only allowed a ceasefire after the election to make Trump look good. If my theory is true then those who withheld their vote rewarded Trump for playing them like pawns.
I also tried to stress to people who were withholding their vote on this issue that Trump would be worse, but it became a degrading affair when the candidate was doing her damndest to nullify that argument. And it was a barely credible proposition in the first place. I don't agree that we've seen that to be correct, seeing as under Trump the ceasefire took hold and the rate of killing went down dramatically compared to Biden's time presiding over this conflict. It's simply not true that the past few months have been the worst period of this conflict. Whether or not Trump/Republicans sabotaged the ceasefire talks behind the scenes is quite irrelevant, seeing as the criticisms of Biden were centered around his own actions. If he had immediately distanced himself from Bibi and the Zionist atrocities, and took the path that the rest of the international community took, he wouldn't have faced nearly the amount of ire. The United States is not (supposed to be) a vassal state of Israel, Biden had autonomy to pursue his own foreign policy. He was not forced to support this genocide, he chose to. And even if Trump was sabotaging the talks, how does that excuse the Biden administration time after time after time carrying Israel's water and refusing to pull back their support? If Bibi was in cahoots with his political enemy, why the fukk wouldn't Biden push the brakes? Your theory makes Biden look even worse.
3) Israel and Biden didn’t start the conflict on October 7th. Yes Israel is a piece of shyt apartheid state and I think Palestine should have its own territory and autonomy but hamas started the conflict in 2023 which led to the genocide.
These wide-scale protests against Biden and Israel didn't start on October 7th. Or October 8th. Or October 9th. Or October 10th. They started when Israel started going fukking OD and indiscriminately bombing the shyt out of civilian areas. And Biden wasn't even really getting the brunt of the protests until he started going OD making up shyt to support the Zionist lies and refusing to condemn the Israeli atrocities.
And there's no such thing as being culpable for starting your own genocide. The October 7th attack only led to the Palestinian genocide because Zionism is a genocidal ideology.
If a Latin American cartel went into Texas and killed thousands of people the country would be glass the next week and we wouldn’t be calling it a genocide. If hamas didn’t attack Israel hundreds of thousands of Palestinians would be alive today. We can’t ignore that fact yet nobody who held their vote for Gaza acknowledges Hamas role when they call Biden a genocidal maniac.
I don't know if your Latin American cartel situation would qualify as a genocide, but it would 1000% qualify as crimes against humanity and would deserve as much protest and outrage as the Israelis and America have received. Murderously annihilating thousands of innocent Latin American children, women and men in revenge for the work of the cartel would be considered completely unacceptable by all legal and moral standards.
The reticence of anti-war protestors to center the culpability of Hamas in the genocide of Palestinians is because it's a rhetorical trick used by Zionists to escape responsibility for their own actions. If the Israelis never responded to Hamas' attack by launching a magnitudes worse genocidal campaign, they wouldn't be getting half of the flack and protest they've been getting. People justifiably have a hard time focusing on someone stealing from a store when there's a mass shooter on the loose. And whatever role Hamas has to play in this conflict naturally has less salience to the withholding voter because their political leadership have not been sending Hamas unlimited munitions and political cover. You're responsible for the actions of your own government, and this government has been supporting the more murderous side in this conflict.
4) Israel has a veto proof uniparty majority in congress. If Biden or Kamala would have stood up to Israel in the way the activist wanted that would have been political suicide because congress would have just overrode them, they would look feckless and right wing media would crucify them. Trump would be guaranteed victory.
This is on the political cowardice and incompetence of Biden and Kamala if they were unable to make standing up to genocide a politically tenable position. Override from a Congress with historically low approval ratings isn't a political death sentence if you know how to effectively communicate your position. In fact, it could be a politically galvanizing event. That's if you actually give a shyt about governing. Instead, the Biden-Harris administration ended up looking completely feckless because they were servile to a genocidal foreign nation, got crucified by right wing media for presiding over mass civic protests and unrest that they were pathetically trying to both-sides, and ended up losing to Trump anyway.
5) complete unwillingness to hold republicans to account. Republicans funded the genocide as well and Trump only indicated he would support Israel even more yet they received no smoke from activist but more than willing to damage Kamala’s campaign.
For the 1000th time, the protestors were not deciding between supporting Republicans and supporting Democrats, they were deciding between supporting Democrats or sitting out. The only people giving Republicans a pass are the Centrist-Liberal faction who chose to platform them during the campaign. The Republican Party is not a viable vehicle through which the protestors/leftists are hoping to exercise their political program. They're defined opposition. The Democrats, for better or worse, are not. So being mad that Mike Johnson (a man who welcomes the hatred of the left) isn't getting as much smoke from the left as Joe Biden (the man many of the protestors/left voted for!) is nonsensical. Republicans don't even pretend to be against things like this genocide, so critiques are only going to go so far from people who have already written you off.
Also, the Presidency is obviously a much higher focal point for public attention - for good things and bad things - than any congressional office. They're the face of the country, especially in the realm of foreign policy. Which is why Biden, the sitting President who supported this genocide, became the face of America's complicity in this atrocity for the protestors. This is always how it's been. Now that Trump is President, you're seeing the protestors focus in on Trump as the face of America's foreign policy.
6)in summary those who withheld their vote should have known better but they were blinded by their emotion and have aided in dooming America to a fascist hell.
In terms of the culpability rankings of the people who doomed America to a fascist hell, anti-war protestors withholding their vote because they were unwilling to be forced into an immoral trolley game of cosigning the mass murder of innocent children are very, very, very far down the list. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris - the people who were actually in charge of the doomed campaign that thought it would be a good idea to gamble with America's future by trying to lock people into this horrific choice - are pretty high up the list.
You may call it being blinded by emotion. I call it being guided by morality. I don't know about you, but I'm not voting for the person who killed my family, man. It is what it is. I don't care whose on the other side of the ballot. You lost my vote if you murder my family. Democrats should do with that what they will. Ideally they'll stop killing people's families and expecting their vote.