You actually typed this out and hit send.
Deep spiritual sigh
Again this retarded assumption assumes
1. That the other side is acting in good faith and will reward lying down with freedom. When the fukk has this ever happened in the history of civilization?
2. That non violent approaches have not been tried. They have. And they failed. A peaceful march to the Gaza border was met with bullets and death. Do you think any rational being chooses violence unless faced with the possibility that this is the most feasible option left to seize initiative even if death is a possibility?
And that's why education is important. A Civil War was fought to end slavery. Colonialism was ended through massive struggles in Algeria and Vietnam, or entities like the British under the threat of violence deciding they didn't want smoke. Apartheid in South Africa was ended through violent constant struggle. MLK got progress because of the threat of violence from the other side fed up.
"Violence isn't the answer" how is it not the answer when it is the language of the oppressor? Can you hear yourself right now?
Jesus fukking christ yo
This is Higher Learning, this is precisely the time and place for these conversations. Only disrespect cheapens the legacy. Not mere conversations.
Unless a mod says otherwise.