The Official Israel 🇮🇱 & Gaza 🇵🇸 Thread

[Robbie3000]

Pro tip this guy is energized after his brief hiatus and ready to defend his boys that have casually dismissed the worth of lives. Building a straw men before eating breakfast is nasty work. Don’t waste your Thursday on him.

Edit:

Once he realized the argument he was trying to make had nothing to do with the reality he moved the goal posts it went from “well would 10% less slavery be okay to okay well you don’t care about them anyway”

Yall have fun with him

What straw man? You argued that we should be happy with 10% less genocide when the democratic president had the power to put the whole thing to an end.

It wouldn’t even have cost us a single American life. Continuing the genocide and ethnic cleaning was a deliberate choice by both the Biden and Trump Administration.

That’s why the sane amongst us don’t make a distinction between the two administrations when it comes to this issue.

 

[wire28]

What straw man? You argued that we should be happy with 10% less genocide when the democratic president had the power to put the whole thing to an end.

It wouldn’t even have cost us a single American life. Continuing the genocide and ethnic cleaning was a deliberate choice by both the Biden and Trump Administration.

That’s why the sane amongst us don’t make a distinction between the two administrations when it comes to this issue.

The conversation had nothing to do with us, which is funny you have a nasty habit of making the situation about you. It’s about the people actually there or who know someone there.

Your boys said Kamala would only have led to “10% less genocide”. Using their own estimate, the argument is those thousands of people that make up that 10% is someone’s family member or friend, so yes that 10% would be important to someone. Casually dismissing those lives as meaningless because it’s not a big enough number to you goes against everything you’re allegedly fighting for. But you already know that, you just want to go back and forth all day, which I don’t plan on doing with you. This is your last response for today.

 

[Robbie3000]

The conversation had nothing to do with us, which is funny you have a nasty habit of making the situation about you. It’s about the people actually there or who know someone there.

Your boys said Kamala would only have led to “10% less genocide”. Using their own estimate, the argument is those thousands of people that make up that 10% is someone’s family member or friend, so yes that 10% would be important to someone. Casually dismissing those lives as meaningless because it’s not a big enough number to you goes against everything you’re allegedly fighting for. But you already know that, you just want to go back and forth all day, which I don’t plan on doing with you. This is your last response for today.

Telling us to accept 10% less genocide when Genocide Joe had the power to stop all of it is nonsensical. Genocide is not a forgone conclusion that you can only mitigate. It was a deliberate and intentional decision made by the Biden and Trump administrations.

That’s why the sane amongst us don’t make a distinction between the two on this issue.

 

[Conan]

You did. According to your logic, you would be fine with a Lincoln presidency that only eliminated slavery in the new territories, but allowed the South to continue the institution.

Lincoln knew slavery was morally wrong and could not be allowed to continue. He waged a righteous and costly war to end ALL of it. Not some of it.

And what’s worse, Biden/Kamala could have ended this genocide with a phone call.

That’s why one guy has a monument dedicated to his
Legacy and the other will be forgotten in a generation.

He would have snitched on John Brown too.

 

[Loose]

You said people should be put back into chattel slavery or experience a terrorist attack over message board disagreements, I don’t think you can judge anyone’s moral character.

If you're going to quote me, at least be accurate in the accusation. The discussion was about you claiming our ancestors were stupid for sacrificing their “future bloodlines” in slave revolts. Imagine worrying about bloodlines while living under occupation and slavery.

 

[Robbie3000]

If you're going to quote me, at least be accurate in the accusation. The discussion was about you claiming our ancestors were stupid for sacrificing their “future bloodlines” in slave revolts. Imagine worrying about bloodlines while living under occupation and slavery.

It all makes perfect sense now.

 

[Loose]

It all makes perfect sense now.

So you wish one of your ancestors said fukk it and did a violent slave uprising?

There’s other ways to achieve freedom than to turn to violence

Peak delusion. You’d rather your entire bloodline past and present not exist so that your ancestors could commit dummy missions and die gruesomely.

 

[Outlaw]

@Loose

Do you wish your ancestor was part of a slave revolt which led to his death, which means you wouldn’t exist?

Either way I don’t wish chattel slavery on anyone, the fact that you’re justifying it shows you have no morality

 

[Loose]

@Loose

Do you wish your ancestor was part of a slave revolt which led to his death, which means you wouldn’t exist?

If they felt they had to participate in a slave revolts to improve their current conditions, i wouldnt give a fukk if I existed or not.

Either way I don’t wish chattel slavery on anyone, the fact that you’re justifying it shows you have no morality

If you want to sane wash the conditions surrounding chattel slavery and discredit those brave ancestors revolting you deserve to experience it.

 

[wire28]

Damn he doubled down on wishing an anonymous guy on a message board be put in chattel slavery in the year 2025 of our lord and savior?

@FAH1223 you wild for letting buddy do his thing wishing death and slavery on nikkas but banning nikkas for petty shyt

 

[Outlaw]

If they felt they had to participate in a slave revolts to improve their current conditions, i wouldnt give a fukk if I existed or not.

If you want to sane wash the conditions surrounding chattel slavery and discredit those brave ancestors revolting you deserve to experience it.

Disgusting straw man that’s borderline psychosis. If you’re such a brave freedom fighter, what’s stopping you from joining Hamas?

 

[Conan]

Do y’all even listen to yourselves? Would 10% less slavery have been okay?

What about 10% less Holocaust deaths?

10% less Jim Crow? Or Apartheid?

10% less colonization?

Yall need some help.

Never seen anything like this before. To anyone with either a modicum of sense or a moral compass, the idea of "10% less genocide/apartheid/Jim Crow/colonization" is nonsensical and fatally flawed, especially when there's an alternate path to zero genocide/et al that is deliberately being ignored by the people in charge.

But then we have our resident centrist "think" tank specialists on here

If you're going to quote me, at least be accurate in the accusation. The discussion was about you claiming our ancestors were stupid for sacrificing their “future bloodlines” in slave revolts. Imagine worrying about bloodlines while living under occupation and slavery.

He's the archetype of a smart dumb nikka

"Ok that's the couch right" head ass

And he's still doubling down on this insane ass premise. "Think about your unborn grandchildren in the middle of hell on earth, I know I would"

 

[Conan]

Disgusting straw man that’s borderline psychosis. If you’re such a brave freedom fighter, what’s stopping you from joining Hamas?

 

[Loose]

Disgusting straw man that’s borderline psychosis.

You invented a hypothetical just to argue that someone should choose submission in hopes to birth grandchildren—meanwhile, I’m teetering on the edge of psychosis

If you’re such a brave freedom fighter, what’s stopping you from joining Hamas?

Another stupid strawman from you. Israeli propaganda strawman at that, all Palestinians are hamas apparently

 

[Robbie3000]

Never seen anything like this before. To anyone with either a modicum of sense or a moral compass, the idea of "10% less genocide/apartheid/Jim Crow/colonization" is nonsensical and fatally flawed, especially when there's an alternate path to zero genocide/et al that is deliberately being ignored by the people in charge.

But then we have our resident centrist "think" tank specialists on here



He's the archetype of a smart dumb nikka

"Ok that's the couch right" head ass

And he's still doubling down on this insane ass premise. "Think about your unborn grandchildren in the middle of hell on earth, I know I would"

What’s crazy is if this genocide had started under Trump, most of them would be in agreement with us 100%.

Excusing genocide to protect a politician and party is nasty work.

Trying to get @Loose banned from the thread under false pretenses for calling them out is even nastier work.