The Official Joe Budden Podcast Thread

s@n

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,564
Reputation
652
Daps
4,353
Joe prefaced his comments about Cassie to say he wasn’t speaking to the legalities. He was speaking to the court of public opinion, which the prosecution is also leveraging, to make Cassie appear completely innocent. They’re trying to use Cassie to sway the jurors into convicting Puff when on the surface the charges are an overreach. The RICO was designed for people like Gotti who were getting people murdered, bribing jurors and committing crimes on a wide organizational scale. A lot of people are pushing back against Puff being overcharged, not him being in legal trouble. What they’re doing is a continuance of the racial double standards under the law. A lot of people on both sides (pro-Puff and pro-Cassie) are failing to see this because the powers that be know they can exploit us by triggering emotions, which they’ve been doing successfully for centuries.

Please name the last case the Feds overcharged. Not fumbled, but overcharged. They don't move "emotionally."
 

Squirrel from Meteor Man

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
27,740
Reputation
3,645
Daps
124,109
Joe, Flip and that Ray Daniels nucca sound nuts during this Diddy discussion. They sound more mad at Cassie than at Puff
Puff touched Ray Daniels butt in Miami which is why he’s defending. Joe is a deviant himself so he has a vested interest in wanting to see a similar person beat this case
 
  • Dap
Reactions: s@n

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
7,614
Reputation
643
Daps
15,893
Please name the last case the Feds overcharged. Not fumbled, but overcharged. They don't move "emotionally."

Uh what does naming the last case have to do with this case? Legal experts have said this is the first RICO they’ve seen with one defendant. And I was speaking to the Feds trying to sway public opinion as far as emotional reactions.
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
7,614
Reputation
643
Daps
15,893
I understand all of that and I'm not really paying much attention to the trial itself. My main point in using the Gotti reference was that no matter how heinous the crime or complicit the witness was, they can still prove valuable in getting the defendant convicted. They spent way too long on that acting (hopefully) like they couldn't understand the opposing POV.

Understood but I don’t think the Gotti situation makes it more digestible. Sammy the Bull admitted to killing 15+ people. He shouldn’t have gotten such a light sentence regardless of how much he cooperated.
 

manyfaces

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,546
Reputation
1,864
Daps
20,995
Understood but I don’t think the Gotti situation makes it more digestible. Sammy the Bull admitted to killing 15+ people. He shouldn’t have gotten such a light sentence regardless of how much he cooperated.
You won't get an argument from me there:hubie:
 
Top