The Official Joe Budden Podcast Thread

[Fani Willis fan]

Mona looking like Aunt Gladys from Weapons

Millennial women think they can go out the house looking crazy on our dime, shyt is getting out of hand. Looking homely at the crib should be the extent of that shyt.
My mom's generation wouldn't dare think about leaving the house looking crazy.

 

[OJ Simpsom]

Millennial women think they can go out the house looking crazy on our dime, shyt is getting out of hand. Looking homely at the crib should be the extent of that shyt.
My mom's generation wouldn't dare think about leaving the house looking crazy.

Gen Z is the worst breh. This ugly ass albino actually brought a blanket to Pod. FOH. Bring back Mel.

 

[FreshAIG]

 

[REdefinition]

Was he in the "Joe Budden seats" again?

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

Which one of you dumbasses paying these patreon prices?

I will be cancelling if he raises priices

 

[EzekelRAGE]

I will be cancelling if he raises priices

Get ready to cancel then. He said he raising them in January. He said if MLH charging $100, he know he can raise his too

 

[Fani Willis fan]

Get ready to cancel then. He said he raising them in January. He said if MLH charging $100, he know he can raise his too

nikkas out here been boycotting Netflix for years and he thinks he can price hike like his content just that special. Aight bet

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

Get ready to cancel then. He said he raising them in January. He said if MLH charging $100, he know he can raise his too

He said on live that his 25 tier is the most lucrative

 

[EzekelRAGE]

He said on live that his 25 tier is the most lucrative

He said he been giving yall grace for the last 4 years. Sounds like $25 and $50 tiers are safe tho
So it's the 5/10 tiers that getting messed with. I know he probably eyeing a $100 tier too.

 

[No1]

Nah he was correct, what you're talking about pertains to court room settlements not contracts preventing someone from going to court.


That new law is how people like Epstein got exposed, because those NDAs people signed were no longer valid.

No he’s not correct. Epstein and guys like that got caught up in the metoo era where statute of limitations were extended. Moreover, a child cannot legally enter into any contract so it’s automatically non-binding. You think Epstein was having 16 year olds sign NDAs legally? Like it really honestly makes me sad how confidently people say uninformed things.

Like the funniest thing is that you have google. You have ChatGPT. You can literally type in what I said and ask for sources from the most respected labor and employment firms in the US and confirm if I’m right but you’re too lazy to do that or are afraid of reading. So I’m going to say this one last time - you can enter into an NDA for workplace sexual harassment but it must be AFTER alleged conduct occurred and it must be at the abused’s request (which must be explicitly stated in the NDA). In New York, there is a 21-day waiting period before it can be signed after receiving the agreement. I don’t even like taking this tone with you guys but you’re just so wrong and unwillingly to take the time to do basic research.

 

[KneeGrow.]

They need to hurry up getting comfortable making fun of Mona. Mel came in there looking like that, it'd be the whole episode

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

They need to hurry up getting comfortable making fun of Mona. Mel came in there looking like that, it'd be the whole episode

It’s not so easy when Mona can crack back

 

[KneeGrow.]

It’s not so easy when Mona can crack back

True but an entertaining back and forth is good for the product. If Joe is what he claims he is, he has to stop holding back

 

[threattonature]

No he’s not correct. Epstein and guys like that got caught up in the metoo era where statute of limitations were extended. Moreover, a child cannot legally enter into any contract so it’s automatically non-binding. You think Epstein was having 16 year olds sign NDAs legally? Like it really honestly makes me sad how confidently people say uninformed things.

Like the funniest thing is that you have google. You have ChatGPT. You can literally type in what I said and ask for sources from the most respected labor and employment firms in the US and confirm if I’m right but you’re too lazy to do that or are afraid of reading. So I’m going to say this one last time - you can enter into an NDA for workplace sexual harassment but it must be AFTER alleged conduct occurred and it must be at the abused’s request (which must be explicitly stated in the NDA). In New York, there is a 21-day waiting period before it can be signed after receiving the agreement. I don’t even like taking this tone with you guys but you’re just so wrong and unwillingly to take the time to do basic research.

You are arguing something that no one has claimed. I clearly stated that we are talking about the initial employment contract. For some reason yo dense ass keeps talking about settlements and now going on a tangent about statute of limitations as if that has anything to do with the conversation. We all have agreed you can enter into an NDA after conduct as part of a settlement. The discussion is if an employer can put something in the initial employment contract saying that if someone is harrassed can they be prevented from suing. That's a completely different topic then what you are arguing about settlements.

In an employment contract there can be an NDA, but a person is allowed to violate an NDA if illegal activity occurs such as harrassment or a hostile work environment.

 

[5n0man]

No he’s not correct. Epstein and guys like that got caught up in the metoo era where statute of limitations were extended. Moreover, a child cannot legally enter into any contract so it’s automatically non-binding. You think Epstein was having 16 year olds sign NDAs legally? Like it really honestly makes me sad how confidently people say uninformed things.

Like the funniest thing is that you have google. You have ChatGPT. You can literally type in what I said and ask for sources from the most respected labor and employment firms in the US and confirm if I’m right but you’re too lazy to do that or are afraid of reading. So I’m going to say this one last time - you can enter into an NDA for workplace sexual harassment but it must be AFTER alleged conduct occurred and it must be at the abused’s request (which must be explicitly stated in the NDA). In New York, there is a 21-day waiting period before it can be signed after receiving the agreement. I don’t even like taking this tone with you guys but you’re just so wrong and unwillingly to take the time to do basic research.

Nobody argued any of this.

Someone claimed Joe had Mel sign an NDA so she cant sue him for sexual harassment. Someone else clarified that laws were passed so that employers cant be contractually protected from abusing employees, You're talking about a settlement NDA.

You built a whole strawman to argue with, calling everyone wrong when you dont even know the context of the discussion you jumped in the middle of.