The Official Joe Budden Podcast Thread

[threattonature]

Doc is capping Ish

Lol she keeps talking around the man with money part but there IS an amount she wants him to make, she just won’t name it (which is smart)

Well let's keep it real. It ain't about how much a man is making and more about how much the man is spending, and more specifically how much a man is willing to spend on them. I've seen up close how many women would rather be with a man spending his last on her than a man that's well off that but financially well off but not willing to blow money on dumb shyt.

 

[Notorious 1 E.Y.E.]

"Mike Brown getting out coached by Dan Quinn" ok man

bronson just getting abused by cj lmao

 

[Mike18jj]

I saw Michael and Joe is never right about movies or shows.

Was it the best movie ever surely not, was it a cool film for a bio-flick absolutely. The little boy and the nephew who played Michael did a good job, this is not on tubi's level at all.

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

 

[valet]

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

Oh no…

 

[1986]

I saw Michael and Joe is never right about movies or shows.

Was it the best movie ever surely not, was it a cool film for a bio-flick absolutely. The little boy and the nephew who played Michael did a good job, this is not on tubi's level at all.

That review was on some Joe hate. He clearly went in not wanting to like it. Joe is super weird for doing that sometimes.

 

[Gizmo_Duck]

That review was on some Joe hate. He clearly went in not wanting to like it. Joe is super weird for doing that sometimes.

Their taste in movies/shows are usually way off but Yall talking like most people aren’t in agreement with their reviews

It has a 23% on RT

 

[Deltron]

Their taste in movies/shows are usually way off but Yall talking like most people aren’t in agreement with their reviews

It has a 23% on RT

critics score.

audience score might as well be 100% with how high it is.

Critics gave this shyt:

Fuze | Rotten Tomatoes

Discover reviews, ratings, and trailers for Fuze on Rotten Tomatoes. Stay updated with critic and audience scores today!

www.rottentomatoes.com

76% and not enough people saw it for an audience score I saw it as the secret movie last week....and shyt was a 40 - 50% flick

 

[Harry B]

Their taste in movies/shows are usually way off but Yall talking like most people aren’t in agreement with their reviews

It has a 23% on RT

I can’t trust the critics when it comes to this movie. Cause the critics are obsessed with rape/pedophilia allegations and since that is not included they’re shytting on it. And also cause his family is involved in it.

Personally I get that you can’t include everything in a biopic and you might wanna keep it factual and not include allegations. But as seen, to those media types, the allegations are the most important thing of his life in these metoo/epstein times we live in

 

[EzekelRAGE]

I can’t trust the critics when it comes to this movie. Cause the critics are obsessed with rape/pedophilia allegations and since that is not included they’re shytting on it. And also cause his family is involved in it.

Ehh, Van and the Midnight Boys had valid criticisms that had nothing to do with the rape allegation shyt.
Basically said they focused on dumb shyt(bubbles doing w/e) and made questionable decisions.
They said they couldve made a story about how a black man is navigating shyt with the power MJ had(that no black celeb had) but the family went another route. One example they gave is the MJ owning the Beatle's catalog shyt. For a while the rumors were MJ snaked them on it but they read some article about how that wasnt the case and how MJ didnt snake Paul for it. Apparently the movie didnt even bother to clear it up. They also mention how MJ got that backlash for owning the Beatle's shyt but Paul McCartney who gave MJ the idea because he owned the publishing of a bunch of ppl, didnt get that same smoke.

They also wanted more on the genius of MJ to be on display and the movie failed on that point. Breaking down how important thriller was and how he came up with it. Van brought up some monster shyt that he got inspiration from.

Another critique from them was the film portraying Latoya as the one close with MJ when he didnt really rock with her.

They praised Jafarr and some of the musical stuff.

Here it is if you care:

 

[Harry B]

Ehh, Van and the Midnight Boys had valid criticisms that had nothing to do with the rape allegation shyt.
Basically said they focused on dumb shyt(bubbles doing w/e) and made questionable decisions.
They said they couldve made a story about how a black man is navigating shyt with the power MJ had(that no black celeb had) but the family went another route. One example they gave is the MJ owning the Beatle's catalog shyt. For a while the rumors were MJ snaked them on it but they read some article about how that wasnt the case and how MJ didnt snake Paul for it. Apparently the movie didnt even bother to clear it up. They also mention how MJ got that backlash for owning the Beatle's shyt but Paul McCartney who gave MJ the idea because he owned the publishing of a bunch of ppl, didnt get that same smoke.

They also wanted more on the genius of MJ to be on display and the movie failed on that point. Breaking down how important thriller was and how he came up with it. Van brought up some monster shyt that he got inspiration from.

Another critique from them was the film portraying Latoya as the one close with MJ when he didnt really rock with her.

They praised Jafarr and some of the musical stuff.

Here it is if you care:

I read a summary of reviews, not one single review. I don’t know how 1 of 100s not focusing on it would refute what I said lol.

 

[Harry B]

Point is that generally speaking, the critics want it to be a dark and complex movie focusing on the allegation and alleged dark sides of his life instead of a celebratory, uplifting movie.

IMO that’s not a solid basis for rating something as wack. Even if it is wack. And it might also not align with the reviews of the fans that want to see the former and not the latter.

 

[EzekelRAGE]

I read a summary of reviews, not one single review. I don’t know how 1 of 100s not focusing on it would refute what I said lol.

Point is that generally speaking, the critics want it to be a dark and complex movie focusing on the allegation and alleged dark sides of his life instead of a celebratory, uplifting movie.

IMO that’s not a solid basis for rating something as wack. Even if it is wack. And it might also not align with the reviews of the fans that want to see the former and not the latter.

Because you handwaved all negative shyt about the film as "they want them to talk about the allegations". i gave you some black people that reviewed the film that purposely went out of their way to judge the film w/o all the allegation shyt.

The argument you using as to ignore the critics, someone could say the same about a person looking at the audience score. This is a music biopic about one of the most popular celebs to walk this earth. Of course the audience score will be high because majority of people who would go see the movie are fans of MJ.

I thought you actually wanted a review that seemed fair, but seems you want to focus on the reviews mentioning the allegations. My bad

 

[Harry B]

Because you handwaved all negative shyt about the film as "they want them to talk about the allegations". i gave you some black people that reviewed the film that purposely went out of their way to judge the film w/o all the allegation shyt.

The argument you using as to ignore the critics, someone could say the same about a person looking at the audience score. This is a music biopic about one of the most popular celebs to walk this earth. Of course the audience score will be high because majority of people who would go see the movie are fans of MJ.

I thought you actually wanted a review that seemed fair, but seems you want to focus on the reviews mentioning the allegations. My bad

Dude posted an aggregate score, I read an aggregate summary. You posted a single one. Ie we are not talking about the same things.
I can also post a single review that gave it 9/10, but why would I do that to counter an average of 100s.

Maybe i need to as literal as in court and say, that I don’t trust aggregator site’s scores. Read reviews instead, or just watch it. Personally I suspect that it’s mediocre.