Breh whats the point of a trilogy when one fighter has won the orginal and rematch decisively? say the fight ends due to a cut on pettis face then we have to have a fourth fight for what? pettis beat him 2x for the title![]()
Like I said, he got caught. He didn't got completely dominated. Bendo has that respect. He may have to fight a few more times like Cownboy because its a competitive division but its not out of the realm for a 3rd fight if Pettis is still champ. This is a company that gave us 3 shamrock/ortiz fights when there was even less incentive and would book a silva/weidman 3rd fight in a heartbeat
Did pettis/bendo even crack 300k? so not only does the fight not need to happen but its not a sure bet the fans are clamoring for either = unnecessary. If ufc had sense they would let him face, cerrone, johnson (if he beats a top 5) & maybe even aldo
before sceduling a 3rd fight with bendo 



What topic did I obliterate you in? It gets harder and harder to recollect all you victims in your wake
to be honest this fight actually has a higher probability than another pettis/bendo. Its certainly more marketable and if Tate beats bethia or some other broad on a streak 
Sometimes you have to know when to quit
he was still in shape
