i kinda wish she put him on the spot and made him answer her comeback about what did he get out of the masks![]()
that would have been glorious
i kinda wish she put him on the spot and made him answer her comeback about what did he get out of the masks![]()
the dialogue of the announcers was definitely pro-Vika. not really anyway around that
even though I thought the media has been behind Naomi and her causes overall
nah Im not saying that, I just think it's fair to acknowledge a biasit wasnt anti naomi though
announcers/former players have a soft spot for comeback stories and of course vika is a mother so chris evert had to squirt every time vika won a point
I don't even think it's wrong, you should try to build the platform of what was the best player in the world, at one point. it would be bad business to notnah Im not saying that, I just think it's fair to acknowledge a biasI don't even think it's wrong, you should try to build the platform of what was the best player in the world, at one point. it would be bad business to not
i prefer announcers who call it right down the middle like the old days but its hard to completely do that in individual sports to some degree
They really wanted Azarenka to win, wanted to play the comeback/new mom story


She hasn’t made a mark on clay or grass yet but with her attributes (easy power & athleticism) she eventually will.So she has no chance at the French?
Cilic @ the US Open?Man this may be the first men's slam final since early 2000's the winner didn't have to beat one of the big 3 along the way to win the title
Edit: Murray Wimbledon 2016