who will win french open

  • nadal

    Votes: 72 38.9%
  • joker

    Votes: 59 31.9%
  • roger

    Votes: 26 14.1%
  • other

    Votes: 28 15.1%

  • Total voters
    185

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,908
Reputation
239
Daps
7,542
@DraymondT

This is why I have been saying for years that it's easy for Djokovic to rack up grand slam titles against the failed "Next Gen" players like Sissypas, Zverev, Tiafoe, Fritz, Milos f*cking Raonic, etc. But as soon as Alcaraz and Sinner started coming of age, that is when his grand slam run decreased immensely

Before 2019, he was sitting on 14 grand slams, until the failed "Next Gen" rolled around. It is what is :manny:


That's why the #GOAT comments need to pump their brakes
Your whole argument is dumb when he was beating Federder, Nadal, Murray etc to those titles too

You talk as if those players were all he was beating

Look at your boy Federers spread of titles against a weaker set of players especially slams

How many of his slams were won against the big three compared to the rest of the field? Nadal too. Now compare that with Federer

It's funny that age only comes into it for the likes of Federer as if he is 15 years older than Djokovic or Nadal, the lack of knowledge some people have is laughable

His numbers are immaculate and Nadals are too in comparison to Federder, Feeder isn't even #2 all time.

Fededer had an easy time winning slams before Nadal.showed up and after that was in the torture rack for years
 
Last edited:

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
70,273
Reputation
17,556
Daps
301,079
Your whole argument is dumb when he was beating Federder, Nadal, Murray etc to those titles too

You talk as if those players were all he was beating

Look at your boy Federers spread of titles against a weaker set of players especially slams

How many of his slams were won against the big three compared to the rest of the field? Nadal too. Now compare that with Federer

It's funny that age only comes into it for the likes of Federer as if he is 15 years older than Djokovic or Nadal, the lack of knowledge some people have is laughable

His numbers are immaculate and Nadals are too in comparison to Federder, Feeder isn't even #2 all time.

Fededer had an easy time winning slams before Nadal.showed up and after that was in the torture rack for years

Sorry Facts are Facts. Look at below. He was sitting at 14 majors by the end of 2018. After 2018 was "his run" where he took advantage of an aging Federer and Nadal and the failed "Next Gen"

3leCmZZ.png




Sissypass :huhldup:, Berrettini :huhldup:, Kyrios :huhldup:, Ruud :huhldup:. Only Medvedev and Theim are on that level. And Theim had to retire due to multiple injuries, another competitor gone

Dude turned pro in 2003, and 10 of Djokovic's grand slam titles came in a span of 6 years in the "Next Gen era"

And thank you for exposing your lack of Tennis knowledge. Federer turned pro 5 years earlier and was 1 foot out the door in 2019. Nadal was an early bloomer, already a top player in his teens, while your boy Djokovic was a later bloomer and became good in this mid 20's. Federer and Nadal had way more mileage and was aging out when Djokovic made his run against the mighty Tiafoe and Taylor Fritz
 

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,908
Reputation
239
Daps
7,542
Sorry Facts are Facts. Look at below. He was sitting at 14 majors by the end of 2018. After 2018 was "his run" where he took advantage of an aging Federer and Nadal and the failed "Next Gen"

3leCmZZ.png




Sissypass :huhldup:, Berrettini :huhldup:, Kyrios :huhldup:, Ruud :huhldup:. Only Medvedev and Theim are on that level. And Theim had to retire due to multiple injuries, another competitor gone

Dude turned pro in 2003, and 10 of Djokovic's grand slam titles came in a span of 6 years in the "Next Gen era"

And thank you for exposing your lack of Tennis knowledge. Federer turned pro 5 years earlier and was 1 foot out the door in 2019. Nadal was an early bloomer, already a top player in his teens, while your boy Djokovic was a later bloomer and became good in this mid 20's. Federer and Nadal had way more mileage and was aging out when Djokovic made his run against the mighty Tiafoe and Taylor Fritz
How was Djokovic a "late bloomer" when he was already in the top 10 by age 19 and won his first slam at age 20 :mjlol:

And you're talking about lack of knowledge? He became "good in his mid twenties" huh? You probably wasn't even watching tennis then, I knew you were an utter casual.

Bring up Federers spread of titles, how many 250 events make up his career total :sas2:

You can't be talking about who Djokovic beat or even Nadal when looking at who Fededer beat to his titles

Burns your sold how many times Djokovic beat down on your boy, Nadal the same.
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
70,273
Reputation
17,556
Daps
301,079
How was Djokovic a "late bloomer" when he was already in the top 10 by age 19 and won his first slam at age 20 :mjlol:

And you're talking about lack of knowledge? He became "good in his late twenties" huh? You probably wasn't even watching tennis then, I knew you were an utter casual.

Bring up Federers spread of titles, how many 250 events make up his career total :sas2:

You can't be talking about who Djokovic beat or even Nadal when looking at who Fededer beat to his titles

Burns your sold how many times Djokovic beat down on your boy, Nadal the same.

I said mid 20s not late 20s, why lie when the post you replied to is right there? :dead:

I see you didn't acknowledge that he won 40% of his grand slams against the failed "Next Gen"? I know it burns your soul lol

And the 2nd bolded. I dare you to say Sissypass, Tiafoe, Fritz, Ruud, etc the "Next Gen all stars" are better then Safin, Hewitt, Juan Carlos Fererro, Nalbandian, etc... I dare you lol
 

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,908
Reputation
239
Daps
7,542
I said mid 20s not late 20s, why lie when the post you replied to is right there? :dead:

I see you didn't acknowledge that he won 40% of his grand slams against the failed "Next Gen"? I know it burns your soul lol

And the 2nd bolded. I dare you to say Sissypass, Tiafoe, Fritz, Ruud, etc the "Next Gen all stars" are better then Safin, Hewitt, Juan Carlos Fererro, Nalbandian, etc... I dare you lol
I edited the postas you can see.

No matter if you said mid twenties it's still bullshyt and shows you don't know what you're talking about, point still stands.


He broke into the top 10.as a teenager and won his first slam.at 20, do you even know what a late bloomer is? That doesn't qualify as good? :mjlol:

I'm talking about the TOTAL of Feds career titles,.again you probably don't know that him either. Go and check his spread of titals especially how many were big titles and you'll see how it pales in comparison with Djokovic and Nadal.

Nothing burns my soul, we good over here. His accomplishments are the best in the game bar none, Fededer doesn't even make the 2nd spot
 
Last edited:

Liu Kang

KING KILLAYAN MBRRRAPPÉ
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
14,039
Reputation
5,574
Daps
30,779
Eh, I'm a Djoko hater and obviously him being the youngest of the big 3 would have always played in his favour in the end but you still got to win those titles. He still managed to beat Alcaraz at the Olympics and pushed both Alcaraz and Sinner those past two years...
 
Top