who will win french open

  • nadal

    Votes: 72 38.9%
  • joker

    Votes: 59 31.9%
  • roger

    Votes: 26 14.1%
  • other

    Votes: 28 15.1%

  • Total voters
    185

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,995
Reputation
270
Daps
7,830
You need a better rebuttal than a Laughing emoji

Need more rational thinking in this conversation
The argument is quite obvious, the fact Djokovic will be the only one to reach 23 slams and will get more, he would be the only one to have each slams 3 times over as well as the double Golden Masters (Federer and Nadal haven't even done it once), most weeks as the world #1, most year end #1's. Should I go on?

You're a Federer fan that's all good but any argument for him over Djokovic is biased garbage to keep it a buck
 

UpAndComing

Veteran
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
73,998
Reputation
18,521
Daps
314,042
The argument is quite obvious, the fact Djokovic has reached 23 and will get more, he would have each slams 3 times over as well as the double Golden Masters, most weeks as the world #1, most year end #1's. Should I go on?

You're a Federer fan that's all good but any argument for him over Djokovic is biased garbage to keep it a buck

Uh huh. Federer's level of competition throughout his career is 10x better than Nadal or Djokovic's and it's not even close

On top of Federer being able to play any player at any style. Whenever Nadal or Djokovic played against a power player with a dominant forehand, they faltered. I'm happy for them, but it's easy to rack up titles against competition that is as 1 dimensional as this era
 

Mazino

All Star
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,995
Reputation
270
Daps
7,830
Uh huh. Federer's level of competition throughout his career is 10x better than Nadal or Djokovic's and it's not even close

On top of Federer being able to play any player at any style. Whenever Nadal or Djokovic played against a power player with a dominant forehand, they faltered. I'm happy for them, but it's easy to rack up titles against competition that is as 1 dimensional as this era
Hell no, no it hasn't his 1st 5 slams were against lesser opposition than Nadal and Djokovic won their first 5 against

Federer benefited from a weaker era it's a fact

Your argument is whack, anyone who really knows Tennis knows Federer was passed up a while ago by both Djokovic and Nadal. That's a dead and buried narrative.
 

phcitywarrior

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
14,594
Reputation
4,937
Daps
34,858
Reppin
Naija / DMV
Nole the GOAT. Ruud doing his best but it’s inevitable now :yeshrug:

Calendar grand slam incoming.

Gonna be a big night for the Serbs. Nole gonna get 23 and Jovic gonna lock up the NBA finals.
 

BucciMane

Kristina Schulman Bro
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
37,854
Reputation
-2,416
Daps
82,583
Reppin
The Real Titletown
Will they let Novak play the US Open this year?:patrice: Breh won't get the vaccine.

The U.S. and Australia did him dirty.:scust:.

He shouldn't have lied in regards to the Australian Open situation, but those of us that can think for ourselves know he was done dirty by some bullshyt.
 

BucciMane

Kristina Schulman Bro
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
37,854
Reputation
-2,416
Daps
82,583
Reppin
The Real Titletown
Fed was sensational, but when people compare him to Djokovic and Nadal, many let his "aura" and style of play influence their opinions big time. I'm not even saying he wasn't better than Nadal, but he definitely has the benefit of being "first" among those three and has had much of the tennis world behind him during their overlapped time.
 

cobra

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
11,760
Reputation
-1,172
Daps
51,070
The U.S. and Australia did him dirty.:scust:.

He shouldn't have lied in regards to the Australian Open situation, but those of us that can think for ourselves know he was done dirty by some bullshyt.
visa restrictions apply for every country
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
32,093
Reputation
5,427
Daps
72,928
The U.S. and Australia did him dirty.:scust:.

He shouldn't have lied in regards to the Australian Open situation, but those of us that can think for ourselves know he was done dirty by some bullshyt.
No one feels bad for him besides people sympathetic to the unvaxxed.
 

phillycavsfan

WAHOOWA
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
24,577
Reputation
1,914
Daps
49,779
Reppin
Philadelphia
Hell no, no it hasn't his 1st 5 slams were against lesser opposition than Nadal and Djokovic won their first 5 against

Federer benefited from a weaker era it's a fact

Your argument is whack, anyone who really knows Tennis knows Federer was passed up a while ago by both Djokovic and Nadal. That's a dead and buried narrative.

This is just Novak fans talking in their own echo chamber.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,332
Reputation
5,956
Daps
94,038
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
The argument is quite obvious, the fact Djokovic will be the only one to reach 23 slams and will get more, he would be the only one to have each slams 3 times over as well as the double Golden Masters (Federer and Nadal haven't even done it once), most weeks as the world #1, most year end #1's. Should I go on?

You're a Federer fan that's all good but any argument for him over Djokovic is biased garbage to keep it a buck

He going to get 30
 
Top