Bumblebreh
Collecting honey and money
Breh it was simple, being in possession of an unregistered firearm that was discharged. Now the prosecution had convinced the jury that Tory was in possession, and he was liable.
The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.
- Thread starter Danny Ocean
- Start date
Breh it was simple, being in possession of an unregistered firearm that was discharged. Now the prosecution had convinced the jury that Tory was in possession, and he was liable.
Ozymandeas
Veteran
I understand that breh. I’m arguing that it’s fugazi. If two hoes are fighting, and I break it up, and one of these hoes shoots the other, how the fukk am I charged with gun possession? That’s backwards. Especially when I have no gun residue on my body and none of my fingerprints are on the gun. You’re not comprehending what I’m saying. They essentially argued that since he was a felon, around a gun that someone else had, then the gun must be his. It’s nonsense.
Bumblebreh
Collecting honey and money
Someone in the car was in possession of an illegal firearm. We have to remember that California has very strict gun laws, now if a third party had owned the gun, neither of the ladies should have been able to physically access it if it was concealed. None of us were present in court, so we did not see how much evidence was presented in court. But there must have been enough to land a guilty verdict. I think the issue is that people are too emotionally invested and I doubt his legal team will get a second chance to successfully appeal the case.
